hedwards: So, I'm not really sure why taking an offer that seems to be too good to be true is somehow wrong.
Neobr10: Because it's not an offer, it's a mistake. If you tried to buy it at 1 cent, fine, even though i'm not morally ok with it. The problem here is to seriously expect a store to honor this "deal" and get pissed about it.
Doesn't matter, the law says that they have to honor the price. BB had the opportunity to check the prices that it posted for items, and didn't.
Ultimately, if they were permitted to change their mind, it would open up all sorts of opportunities to bait and switch. Considering that they not just offered the item at that price, but confirmed it as well, they are on the hook.
hedwards: What does honor have to do with this? Corporations take advantage of consumers all the time, they set up their stores and websites to fleece the unsuspecting customer.
Neobr10: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_make_a_right Gonadius: I'd say it was far more honourable to not take advantage of a blatant error.
Neobr10: Haha, it's funny to see he mention honor while defending taking advantage of an obvious mistake. Hypocrysy, really.
There is no hypocrisy here. Just because in your imaginary world honor is rewarded, does not mean that the rest of us in the real world get rewarded for it.
In other words, precisely when do I get a check to cover the times when there was a mistake that was made in their favor? Answer, never, because they would never do such a thing.