michaelleung: I completely do not give a shit. For one thing, this might mean AT&T users could get a decent fucking signal once in a while.
The problem is that in the US, we've got a very small pool of providers. I think my options right now are AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon, Sprint and Boost Mobile, and I think that's it. Other parts of the country have US Cellular and Cricket, but I think that's about it.
The FCC might authorize it, but the DoJ shouldn't, as this is a pretty blatant violation of our Clayton Antitrust Act. Basically, mergers and acquisitions where the effect may substantially lessen competition are forbidden. Now it takes a look at the case law to know what exactly that means, but in this case it's pretty certain to apply.
Now, getting the DoJ to get off their fat backsides and actually enforce the law is asking a lot. These were the same basic yahoos that thought that it was OK for Google to buy Doubleclick.
michaelleung: I completely do not give a shit. For one thing, this might mean AT&T users could get a decent fucking signal once in a while.
Foxhack: AT&T is implementing download caps on internet users.
I don't think you're getting an improvement here.
All carriers in the US have some sort of a cap, but T-Mobile was ahead of everybody else in terms of not caring what you do with it. If you wanted to use that bandwidth for tethering so be it, but if you went over the 5gb they would take appropriate actions.
AT&T OTOH charges for unlimited data, but tells you how you can use it and charges for the privilege of using it for tethering on top of charging for the bandwidth used.