Damn it !

I would choose the Spy. If I've learned anything about royalties, it's that there's always backstabbing, and I'd like the most skilled backstabber on my side!

Thanks for the giveaway, Ghorpm, and count me in! :D

Not to get too historical but where would someone like Rasputin fit in here? Priest, mage, noble?

Monk is probably the best appellation. Granted he was one of those depraved monks, but still, if the robe fits...

Last derail then I promise I'll stop. What is this 'His' crap? :P Granted the case can me made that god has to be a guy because in terms of creating people a woman would have done a better job, but still it is a tad presumptuous.

See attached.

If we're going to argue spelling, I would like to reiterate my objection to the spelling of Tzar. We already have Tsar and Czar in English, and adding a third is just gratuitous, even if it is allowed.

Also, as a language buff, I'm ashamed to admit that many years passed before I realised that the term Czar comes from Caesar. As does Kaiser. Oh the long and mighty reach of Rome...

In fact ...God created the Bearded Women in His image, but His boss thought it was obvious so they didn't make an official statement with it ... but then Grammar occured and He was stuck with male attributes, the PR team did really poor damage assesment and they were late so they let the artistic blur about His sex settled in ..... but then earthly offices started not reading the divine memos ... so after a lot of miscommunication, here they are : making stupid rules like "Don't speak the name of God in vain because it implies you have to use an article, and you think the male one is the good one but it isn't. So just stop it is making things even more awkward for the company'.



You promised not to derail again , right ? ;)

The peasant because the peasant is the base and it is the existence and toil of the peasant that allows all others, be they mages, or spies, or crusaders, or nobles to exist and to prosper.

haha, well, I cannot deny being a miscreant :P

So far so good :) some of your answers are really great. I found one of them particularly amusing and it will win the prize if nothing better comes. I'll close the contest tomorrow so everything is still possible...

Nice giveaway Ghorpm +1
Makes good reading too:)

I think I'll give this a go. +1 for your generosity. :)
I think I would take mage for many of the added benefits such as someone versed in the arcane arts, also a means of control over those who oppose me. I would have him or her train me in the mystical arts if possible, and then rule with an iron fist...since saying magical fist seems less imposing. Also, using mystical abilities I could learn the true intentions of my people and learn of the ones who would seek cause harm to other citizens and deal with them...magically :D.

I would definitely pick the peasant. The most important reason is for the group motivation factor. With many of th eother choices having an exceptionally fit second in command would be valuable because of their unique characteristics. However, rewarding loyalty and having humble peasant generals willing to work with the people and inspire them will yield an army of more capable soldiers. Promoting the peasant will engender a sense of loyalty and togetherness necessary for resources to band together until the death to stave off invaders and threats (versus having a single superior pompus mage or single handed spy, more fleeting and easily disposed of). Even if the peasant fails to motivate soldiers and farmers towards unity and vistory he will likely have a diehard loyalty and commitment. Also, the peasant (generalist) will have the capability to learn (instead of arrogantly deciding he's got a talent already). Never under-estimate the value of an unassuming approach.

Peasant - he saved your life when you were young and accompanied you ever since


Thank you for the novel giveaway contest, +1