Posted January 01, 2013
I'll probably get ripped to shreds for using a term that is not a real legal status, but obviously it is a word with /some/ form of meaning. Could we say something like, "Abandonware is not a real legal status, and is illegal (although not necessarily immoral) to download/pirate. However, it can be used to describe games whose IPs are not being actively managed and controlled by their current owners, and therefore have seemingly been "abandoned" and left to be managed by fans of the games." (something like that)
Anyway, actual topic:
So something I think a fair portion of us like about GOG is how they bring dead-but-not-forgotten games back to life, resurrecting them out of obscurity often for the price of 5.99. I was wondering, though, do you think there are ever times when GOG should consider not bringing a game here for a price, even though it might be good and old? Are there times when even good games should be left on places like Abandonia, free and open to those who are willing to fiddle with DOSBox themselves? Does it ever help GOG's image to leave certain classic titles alone and free (for those who like "abandonware" and don't like what GOG does), or should the focus always be on what GOG's customers want (even if that means attaching a 5.99 price tag)?
Not sure how much of this makes sense; I was browsing http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?platform=5&mode=all&sort=release&dlx_type=all&sortdir=desc&official=all&page=15 and somewhere along the line these thoughts came to me.
Anyway, actual topic:
So something I think a fair portion of us like about GOG is how they bring dead-but-not-forgotten games back to life, resurrecting them out of obscurity often for the price of 5.99. I was wondering, though, do you think there are ever times when GOG should consider not bringing a game here for a price, even though it might be good and old? Are there times when even good games should be left on places like Abandonia, free and open to those who are willing to fiddle with DOSBox themselves? Does it ever help GOG's image to leave certain classic titles alone and free (for those who like "abandonware" and don't like what GOG does), or should the focus always be on what GOG's customers want (even if that means attaching a 5.99 price tag)?
Not sure how much of this makes sense; I was browsing http://www.gamespot.com/games.html?platform=5&mode=all&sort=release&dlx_type=all&sortdir=desc&official=all&page=15 and somewhere along the line these thoughts came to me.