It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussion (archive)A serious question(22 posts)(22 posts)
(22 posts)
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Posted April 13, 2014
I have two cheeks already..........mmmh.....make that four :D
Post edited April 13, 2014 by LoboBlanco
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
MaximumBunny: That's actually a misconception, Mr. Roman. Something and nothing both do not actually exist. They are abstract concepts used to measure and quantify reality. Things just 'are', and our understanding of them to be additive, subtractive, or exponential is simply a mental construct.

Also - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UroZlbU_3Ek :D
.
.
Enh...are you suggesting being victim to a pre-written experience which we can only let happen while sitting on our hands and griping or a quantum experience with a live external host introducing stimuli in context to the thoughts and actions of the subject?

I would be in terrible regret if I let my escape ship sale away without me due to a religious conviction that I would've been on it had that been the pre-written plot which is completely unaffected by pro-activity, motivation or choice.
.
.
avatar
Randalator: I'd rather have chicks for free...
.
.
You were expecting Dire Straits too?
Post edited April 13, 2014 by carnival73
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
carnival73: .
.
Enh...are you suggesting being victim to a pre-written experience which we can only let happen while sitting on our hands and griping or a quantum experience with a live external host introducing stimuli in context to the thoughts and actions of the subject?

I would be in terrible regret if I let my escape ship sale away without me due to a religious conviction that I would've been on it had that been the pre-written plot which is completely unaffected by pro-activity, motivation or choice.
.
.
All I'm saying is that you can be wearing pants and NOT wearing pants simultaneously. The concept of 'wearing' is just an identifier of an action, which in itself is simply particles transferring energies. There is no spoon. ^^
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
MaximumBunny: All I'm saying is that you can be wearing pants and NOT wearing pants simultaneously. T
Yes, you can. It's called chaps...
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
jamyskis: GOG seems to be working on allowing you to get nothing for something...
I am still curious how that is in progress. That all started because of me being a tit lol.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Rush says you can't get something for nothing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip-vRmUxfBA
Everyone say... GEDDY LEE!!!
Post edited April 13, 2014 by darthspudius
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Rush says you can't get something for nothing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip-vRmUxfBA
I always think Rush whenever someone says that.
Posted April 13, 2014
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Rush says you can't get something for nothing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ip-vRmUxfBA
avatar
AnimalMother117: I always think Rush whenever someone says that.
I may have to give that record a spin today.
Pages:
1
2
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussion (archive)A serious question(22 posts)(22 posts)
(22 posts)