Are you saying he's right about certain peop... oh. :x

Yes, a bug. Something similar occured to the Fall sale, with the Mount & Blade bundle.

Oh, ok ! That's what I was thinking, but wasn't totally sure :)
Thanks for the info ! I hope they'll fix this soon !

Is it really a bug? I was under the impression that it was just about rounding numbers? Since you really never get anything that's 2,16 Euro or whatever, it's always x,x9. So with the switching between currencies back and forth there are bound to be some cases where the discount isn't exactly 75 or 25 %
(Rounding checks out e.g. for King's Bounty Warriors of the North, discount in Euro is 74,4%)

It's a bug. Warriors of the North had a price of €5.99 yesterday with a full 75% discount, but today it costs €6.09, with its full price (€23.79), unaffected. It probably happened when GOG adjusted its prices for Australia and Russia (with flat-priced games becoming more expensive in their local currency, while regionally-priced becoming less expensive in dollars).

Ah, alright, I thought it was meant to be this way (since there seem to be quite a few games affected by this). Thanks for clearing that up!

I am not sure that it is a bug, GoG adjusted conversion rates for regional pricing. I'll have a look if can find the thread again.

edit:
Regional pricing currency adjustment

Well, encore day and all I purchased in this winter promo was Cosmo's Cosmic Adventure

Y u no bundle Police Quest+Space Quest, gog???

Can you guys recommend the Prince of Persia bundle to someone who so far has only played the 2008 Prince of Presia, and really liked it?

Also, should I buy Might and Magic 9 and Crusaders for 2,98$ or D&D Dragonshard and Demon Stone for 3,98$?
Those are the only ones I'm missing from those bundles, but I'm very unsure. I just don't want to spend on games I won't enjoy.

U mad, bro?
Lol no, I wanted them too.

Looking forward to the sales finishing up.

Looking forward to Strife.

Yes and yes. IMHO the only fault of those games is that they are not epic and thus they are misjudged because of D&D in their titles. If they were set in some other fantasy universe they would be treated as solid RTS and action game, respectively and praised for their innovative features.

In Dragonshard you'll be simultaneously fighting on a two planes. On the surface it's a pretty much standard RTS. You collect dragonshards that fall from the sky, build your base, train units and defend against the enemy (and in most cases you are supposed to destroy his base). Slightly less typical thing is that you only train commander units and each of them "create" followers (a weaker versions of the commander but with the same abilities). How many followers will be created depends on how you upgraded your base (the space is limited, you won't get everything at once). On top of that you have a hero unit. Before each mission you can usually choose one out of four so you can experiment a bit to see who suits you best. The trick is you also need gold to train units and for that you have to go underground. At this point it looks slightly more like an action RPG game - the followers disappear (they will come back once you come back to the surface) so you will have a small party of your hero + commander units. You can order them to rest to regain health and mana just like in RPG game. And you can expect standard dungeon crawling challenges - traps, locked chest (you need a thief to open them), respawning enemies (undeads and similar) that are hostile toward you and your enemy from above alike. Of course you can meet your enemy too if he decided to travel down there for some gold. And this mechanism of two different planes works surprisingly well and it's quite innovative. It's not enough to make this game a masterpiece it has its flaws, for example there is no need for melee units, ranged units are so much better in every respect (for a game released at 2005 it's a terrible anachronism!). Nevertheless it's a very solid RTS without any major frustrations. It is entertaining so why shouldn't you give it a chance?

The same applies to Demon Stone. It's also a very solid game, just not a masterpiece. You get to control three characters: warrior, sorcerer and rogue. There are small sections where you are forced to use one of them (in one chapter you even get to play as Drizzt Do'Urden!) but in general you are free to switch which character you control and the others fight on their own. Once again, this concept works surprisingly well and it's beneficial to change your character often. You can for example accumulate some energy to make a special move (different for each character) or you can wait a bit, accumulate energy for all characters and perform ultra-destructive-whole-party-special-move. I have to admit that fighting can be a bit repetitive - you are constantly facing waves of weak or moderate enemies so you just have to slain everything without any finesse. Boss battles are usually quite nice and my favorite parts are where you are not supposed to kill everybody around but do something differently. For example you have to protect a stronghold and it's attacked from various sides. It's a bit tricky not because enemies are challenging (they are not) but you have to keep at bay every group of them. The story is a cliché but it's well told so I actually liked it.

So yeah, if you don't expect D&D awesomeness you should get both games, they are solid enough and deserve to be played.