Posted March 19, 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/470f9/470f9f6fb5ff71742119721828fa3e695ddf7666" alt="avatar"
I just don't like Disney's usual candy coated song-filled style. My favourite movies of theirs are the ones furtherest away from the "Disney Princess" musical love story - The Great Mouse Detective, Black Cauldron, Winnie the Pooh. Even Aladdin, despite technically featuring songs and a princess is much more of an action adventure story.
I always explain the difference between Black Cauldron and most Disney movies by just showing people this clip and saying "this is his "villain song moment" :D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/470f9/470f9f6fb5ff71742119721828fa3e695ddf7666" alt="avatar"
Luckily for me in this regard I haven't read any of the books these films are based on (and based on what you've just said I'm glad I didn't - before the films at least, I still want to read them), so luckily I was free to judge the films entirely on their on merits. But for any fans of preceding media/literature that is of course impossible. It's just that you sometimes(usually?) get the short end of the stick. I know that all to well myself.
And I encourage you - read those books. I don't think it can ruin your already made up mind on the movies (like me and the Black Cauldron) but it's well worth it, for the books themselve as much as for the knowledge of how they differ from the films. For example it's quite remarable how Captain Hook is basically a buffoon, a comedic villain in the Peter Pan film, yet in the book he's this fascinating gentelmanly monster of a human being with "eyes which were of the blue of the forget-me-not save when he was plunging his hook into you, at which time two red spots appeared in them and lit them up horribly".
Post edited March 19, 2018 by Breja