TStael: It actually bothers me slightly that you imply - or not? - the right persons are the casual ones.
Gede: What I wanted to say is that some people or organization manage to hide their corruption in an effective way. To think that the truth always surfaces is no more than wishful thinking. The world is not fair or pretty.
I'm not saying "give up" or "just go along with it". I'm saying that people should perceive the world for what it really is. Take this thread as an example. If this is the reaction someone gets for speaking their minds about using a foreign service in a website, imagine what it would be if large amounts of money were flowing in.
Well, it will not change until "anti-spam" and "anti-phishing" civil activity reaches heights of TTIP citizens' protests!
Data mining is nasty, but it is yet an enabler for worse nastiness - spam or phishing. Data mining with a nasty and un-truthful commercial purpose.
Yet there has frankly been little public protest against commercial intrusion into privacy, when from my perspective we should be furious: EU-US would have a secrete court system to compensate multi-nationals against citizen friendly rulings that might hurt unscrupulous corporations.
Take your cue: tobacco companies suing Australia. They yet cannot do it with Europe, but if they could - they would.
In all of this, I have not seen ANYTHING that would convince me that I as a citizen that does not wish to be defrauded or spammed could have equitable recourse to bring forth punishment to international spammers. In fact, post TTIP, US or EU spammers could sue for any anti-spam legislation...
I am not anti TTIP per se - only, I think the consumer protection should take lead from the European Court. The commercial and consumer rights are, IMO, one of the best achievements of EU.