It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
high rated
What i really don’t like about CDPR is that They always play it safe with no risks and Innovation. For example Instead of letting us create our own witcher we now play as ciri. How innovative lol. The same with cyberpunk where they showed a full blown character creator, where we could give V. a proper first and last name and it was cut with vincent and valery because its easier lol. Same with all the possible life Paths which were cut. In the end it was an action Adventure like the witcher. Witcher is still a good Game though but i already have accepted that CDPR doesnt make Rpgs. A shame tbh
Post edited December 13, 2024 by ChristophWr
high rated
Oh, it's just you.
Since when did CDPR let you create a character, anyways?

I hope you catch cooties from the thought of having to play as a girl.
high rated
Typically fanboy comment……whoever you are lol
high rated
eh don't mind that much about char creation.. just hope that it runs fine at launch unlike yk lol
high rated
I guess you have to ask yourself if they can afford to not play it safe.
high rated
I'd rather play with a set character than create one

Also obvious baity low effort thread is obvious
high rated
Cyberpunk itself was a big risk. They did something so different from the Witcher games. I think your issue is the kind of games they do not really about risks and innovations. They always focus on narrative which often limits other areas of the gameplay.
Post edited December 13, 2024 by Hirako__
high rated
The previous Witcher games had excellent storytelling. And I think having an established character as the protagonist helps with that.

I don't expect a Witcher game to suddenly be an Elder Scrolls game.

And again this is just a cinematic trailer.
high rated
I still find it stunning that people can look at a video, not gameplay or anything, and then go from there.

Hold back till you see something tangible lad
high rated
avatar
ChristophWr: What i really don’t like about CDPR is that They always play it safe with no risks and Innovation. For example Instead of letting us create our own witcher we now play as ciri. How innovative lol. The same with cyberpunk where they showed a full blown character creator, where we could give V. a proper first and last name and it was cut with vincent and valery because its easier lol. Same with all the possible life Paths which were cut. In the end it was an action Adventure like the witcher. Witcher is still a good Game though but i already have accepted that CDPR doesnt make Rpgs. A shame tbh
I think Ubisoft is playing it safe with sequel 20 of every franchise.
CDPR made a new IP with cyberpunk.

But I will try to agree with you. Character creation could be more extensive.

However, I don't like character creation and always pick something generic and skip passed it.
There are other elements that make a game a role playing game.
high rated
I dunno, it looks great to me. The Best RPGs I've enjoyed were The Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk. I don't know what you mean by they don't make RPGs. TW 4 looks... ok... But I'm wondering why Ciri was downgraded and seems to be a Witcher (without the eyes, I might add) and doesn't have her full suite of other abilities.
high rated
Have to disagree with this take.

CDPR arguably only has 2 really big IPs to capitalize on: Witcher and Cyberpunk.

Witcher is their flagship series and has been pretty different. Witcher 1 plays differently from 2 which is different from 3 although 3 is arguably the most "norm-friendly." I do agree that there might be too much emphasis on narrative and player choice over combat mechanics and gameplay but for a western dev, Witcher 3 is quite fair and good compared to other series like anything from Rockstar. The Witcher 1 remake and Witcher 4 likely wont change up combat too much given how well recieved witcher 3 was.

However, CDPR did take alot of risks with Cyberpunk. Brand new IP for them, going first person, character customization, gun combat vs melee. I do think they were too ambitious and should have stuck to their strengths (third person instead of chasing first because its "popular") but I wouldnt say CDPR is playing it "safe" like Ubisoft, Rockstar, or EA.
high rated
avatar
ChristophWr: What i really don’t like about CDPR is that They always play it safe with no risks and Innovation. For example Instead of letting us create our own witcher we now play as ciri. How innovative lol. The same with cyberpunk where they showed a full blown character creator, where we could give V. a proper first and last name and it was cut with vincent and valery because its easier lol. Same with all the possible life Paths which were cut. In the end it was an action Adventure like the witcher. Witcher is still a good Game though but i already have accepted that CDPR doesnt make Rpgs. A shame tbh
I have to agree. The Witcher 3 introduced different schools of witchers, and for a brief moment, I thought this would allow for more character personalization in the next game, especially since it marked Geralt's final adventure. However, I still believe Ciri was more of a side character, much like the other witchers. It felt unnecessary to make her a witcher, especially since she already possessed unique powers. Personally, I think this decision undermines the established lore, and pushing Ciri into Geralt's role instead of focusing on the other witchers feels misplaced.
high rated
Nobody asking "Why not make games within the Witcher world space?". Same silly crap with Star Wars, where every one and their mother has to be a jedi....because shiny glow sticks that buzz buzz.
high rated
Yes, creatively CyberPunk broke a new field for CDPR, which was perfectly understandably bold of them. Certainly not in the same vain as W3. Still fun though even though the city still feels empty (or was, as I haven't tried anything past 1.6).

I think people forget how few of the talented free-minded and creative people who worked on W3 still are there any longer. W3 set the bar so high that it would almost be impossible to top it, and seeing how games now are more and more being aggressively made by investors for investors, including too many safe rules, they're bound to fail one after the other.

https://www.gamepressure.com/newsroom/cd-projekt-red-reveals-why-ciri-is-the-witcher-4s-protagonist-its/z276ad

She's actually about to become the Witcher. She's about to actually form her own codex, but on her own terms. The way she actually deals with the monsters, the way she deals with quests, the adventures, it's her own unique way. And also I think that she gives more room to be able to tell different stories here and there. Of course, we want to give the opportunity for the player to explore more nuance because this is what we do. But she deserves that.
They really had to point it out. Somehow, I'm getting flashbacks from Captain Marvel and ReyRey, perfect examples of terrible written characters.

From what I read from people who are much more into the lore it's actually very puzzling on how they're going to make this work and fit into the established lore.

I just don't want to see CDPR fall further down the "evil" path of less fun and less mature games also since they abandoned DRM-free some time ago and seeing how many games fails these days. And considering the hiring practices in many companies these days it's only logical to be skeptical.

Timboli actually had a comment to ponder on possible foreseen consequences... Time will tell, as they say.
Post edited December 16, 2024 by sanscript