It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
KingofGnG: Yep, Windows 10 is the best Windows ever. If you are a retarded monkey, who never used a computer, and have a QI 100 points below the Forrest Gump level.
avatar
fishbaits: ....

IQ*

(couldn`t resist haha)
QI = Quoziente intellettivo (IQ in Italian). I shouldn't enter argument that I have no time to manage :-S

Even though....

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/07/30/windows-10-privacy-settings/

Windows 10 IS a piece of shit. Jesus fucking Christ, are you really cool with a PC operating system that assign you a "unique advertising ID" to track the hell out of you? I'm not, and I won't, ever.
Post edited July 30, 2015 by KingofGnG
avatar
cogadh: On my fucking gawd, I finally figured out my start menu issues! Apparently, when MS was coding the new start menu, one of their idiot programmers decided that setting a limit on the number of shortcuts the menu will handle was a good idea. He/she set that limit at 512 items. My start menu, with all the game shortcuts I have installed (plus their accompanying uninstall, game manual, dev website, configuration app, etc. shortcuts) added up to 947 items. A little less than half my shortcuts were never going to appear in the start menu. After cleaning out a few shortcuts (110), now the one shortcut that started this whole thing (Steam) is finally available. Looks like I'll be spending the rest of the day picking through the rest of my shortcuts to get rid another 300 or so before the start menu is useful.
avatar
MikeMaximus: That's good to know, the indexing and start menu are my biggest issues right now too.

I was wondering why 1/2 my shit isn't in there. Does that also affect stuff not even showing up in a search? After indexing twice my ext2 manager still won't show up in a search,
Yes it does affect indexing. Since any shortcuts outside that 512 limit cannot be displayed on the start menu, they get dropped from the index. The directories those shortcuts point to will get indexed, so you can still launch things by going directly to the executable in the file browser through search.
avatar
KingofGnG: Windows 10 IS a piece of shit. Jesus fucking Christ, are you really cool with a PC operating system that assign you a "unique advertising ID" to track the hell out of you? I'm not, and I won't, ever.
Do you use Amazon? You have a unique advertising ID. You are also aware that you can change your unique advertising ID, as well as not allow it to be used, right?
avatar
Gilozard: 1) I'll repeat - hidden admin tools that need active user involvement to download and forum-made scripts are NOT a replacement for removed OS functionality.
avatar
JMich: The scripts are for those that don't know what to change. Similar to a game bundled with DOSBox instead of the game files and DOSBox as separate things you have to mix yourself.
Updates could be disabled and selectively installed for at least a month, assuming one knows what he's doing. If he doesn't know, then automatic updates are recommended.

avatar
Gilozard: 2) Are you seriously trying to pretend that MS has not completely changed their GUI guidelines and design standards? Because that's crazy - the look of MS programs across the board has changed (except for where they can't be bothered to be consistent, 'cause that's how MS rolls). Yes, Win10 is still Windows, but the look and feel are completely different and people keep getting switched from one interface to the other. It's better than Win8, but not by much. Maybe it doesn't bother you, but it bothers a lot of people. Or confuses them to the point of helplessness, which makes me want to tear my hair out.
avatar
JMich: Let me put it this way. I don't care what the icons look like, as long as they do their job. I didn't mind the ribbon change on Office 2007, since the keyboard shortcuts still worked, and it wasn't that different from before. I do think I'm able to adapt to changes, especially if they are only visual ones.

avatar
Gilozard: 3) Yeah, removing cloud integration is a complete pain in the ass, not available to the average user at all, and difficult to turn off without removing to boot. My options for Win10 in this office are:
a) Remove OneDrive completely, or
b) Deal with people mistakenly saving things to the cloud, or thinking they've saved them to Dropbox when it's really OneDrive, etc.
Both are going to be a hassle.
avatar
JMich: gpedit.msc -> Local Computer Policy -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components -> OneDrive and set it to disabled. If you are in a company, you really should learn to use the Group Policy Editor.
And it is literally a single setting, with a "not configured, disabled, enabled" option.

P.S. Before complaining about other stuff that is not available, dig through the policy editor first.
1) What part of 'average users can't use or won't know about separate admin tools and forum scripts' and 'downloading and configuring lots of crap makes life hard to IT staff' is hard for you to understand? At this point I can only assume that you are deliberately ignoring my point.

2) Fair enough - but most users aren't able to adapt to significant visual changes, since they rely on visual cues to tell them what to do. And sometimes the changes aren't solely visual, they're actual changes to workflows which is a whole other ball of ugly wax. Until you've had to walk a middle-aged manager though accessing the file server for the 5th time, you really don't understand how hard computers are for some people.

3) Yeah, and that's helpful. But it's still not the same as the easy, obvious Win7 functionality of Let People Install Their Own Crap.

Also, group policies need all the computers to be in a group. Someday I'll get over the PTSD and start talking about the previous IT staff here. I now assume they were constantly drunk. Anyway, sorting out the PC administration took a backseat to recovering from the server fire.

TL;DR
Speaking as an overworked IT admin, WIn10 does not look like a good bet at this point. The Update changes are on a long list of items that mean I'm going to lose time I can't afford just to get people back to productivity, for no real feature gains that anyone here cares about.

Speaking as someone who is interested in computer security and maintainability, MS's decision to start locking options down and integrating online functionality at a basic level without providing easy ways for average users to disable it leaves me very wary. It's a lot of small changes that add up to MS not respecting user decisions and making possibly bone-headed choices based on assumptions I disagree with. If I wanted that I'd get a Mac.
Post edited July 30, 2015 by Gilozard
avatar
KingofGnG: Windows 10 IS a piece of shit. Jesus fucking Christ, are you really cool with a PC operating system that assign you a "unique advertising ID" to track the hell out of you? I'm not, and I won't, ever.
avatar
JMich: Do you use Amazon? You have a unique advertising ID. You are also aware that you can change your unique advertising ID, as well as not allow it to be used, right?
That's not even remotely the same thing. When ti's a website that you have to opt into it's bad enough, when it's a OS that you're largely forced to use and subsequently have to opt out of, it's ridiculous.

People shouldn't have to be on the look out for these sorts of things, they should be able to trust that MS is going to do the right thing. But, then again, when has MS ever done the right thing? They're pretty much poster boys for abusive practices followed with little or no punishment.
avatar
KingofGnG: Windows 10 IS a piece of shit. Jesus fucking Christ, are you really cool with a PC operating system that assign you a "unique advertising ID" to track the hell out of you? I'm not, and I won't, ever.
avatar
JMich: Do you use Amazon? You have a unique advertising ID. You are also aware that you can change your unique advertising ID, as well as not allow it to be used, right?
Yeah, but I can see why people are upset over having an OS tracking you in that way. OSes have a lot more power and access than a single website. There's tools to manage Amazon or Google tracking like No Script, but that can't really work with the OS.

This kind of decision really screams that MS is using their OS to bruteforce users into the MS online services / sell user data - that's what everyone who tracks users for advertising does, after all - and it's extremely uncomfortable that a paid operating system would do this.

Look at how many people aren't happy that Android does this. They put up with it because Android is cheaper, but lots of people install firewalls, root, etc. Also, security is a big marketing point for Apple right now. MS seems to be going the Android root but still expecting people to pay for Windows (the free upgrade is time limited and only applies to a certain group of people - the default is still paid licenses).
Post edited July 30, 2015 by Gilozard
avatar
Gilozard: 1) What part of 'average users can't use or won't know about separate admin tools and forum scripts' and 'downloading and configuring lots of crap makes life hard to IT staff' is hard for you to understand? At this point I can only assume that you are deliberately ignoring my point.
Having worked in IT, here are the possible scenarios
1) Your users are incompetent bufoons. Your IT guy sets the computers, and he makes sure they are set up correctly. Automatic Updates will be set to on.
2) Your users are competent tech users. They ask the IT guys to set the computers to their liking.
3) Your IT is incompetent. You are screwed.

avatar
Gilozard: 2) Fair enough - but most users aren't able to adapt to significant visual changes, since they rely on visual cues to tell them what to do. And sometimes the changes aren't solely visual, they're actual changes to workflows which is a whole other ball of ugly wax. Until you've had to walk a middle-aged manager though accessing the file server for the 5th time, you really don't understand how hard computers are for some people.
I have. A background in education does help, since you shouldn't tell them "Click this icon" but explain what they are looking for, and where it may be found. If you lack the patience, the "Give me 5 minutes and I'll do it myself" is a valid solution as well.

avatar
Gilozard: 3) Yeah, and that's helpful. But it's still not the same as the easy, obvious Win7 functionality of Let People Install Their Own Crap.
Group Policy Editor has existed for more than 15 years. Anyone who wishes to call himself an expert on computing should really be aware of it.

avatar
Gilozard: Also, group policies need all the computers to be in a group.
? You mean the Workgroup "WORKGROUP"? Because that's the only group my computer is on, no domain, nor anything else.

avatar
Gilozard: TL;DR Speaking as an overworked IT admin, WIn10 does not look like a good bet at this point. The Update changes are on a long list of items that mean I'm going to lose time I can't afford just to get people back to productivity, for no real feature gains that anyone here cares about.
Go to MDL, spend a couple of weeks reading, then deploy Win10 in one sweep. If you are the IT admin, you should be the one that says when Win10 is ready to be installed, unless the "IT admin" is just a title, and someone else makes the decisions. In that case, you have my sympathy.

P.S. Disable the admin account and give the people a restricted one. Will save you quite a bit of headaches, especially if you reply to any requests about programs with "That may be a security risk, please file a formal request so I can check it, and if it passes inspection, I may install it".
avatar
fishbaits: ....

IQ*

(couldn`t resist haha)
avatar
KingofGnG: QI = Quoziente intellettivo (IQ in Italian). I shouldn't enter argument that I have no time to manage :-S

Even though....

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/07/30/windows-10-privacy-settings/

Windows 10 IS a piece of shit. Jesus fucking Christ, are you really cool with a PC operating system that assign you a "unique advertising ID" to track the hell out of you? I'm not, and I won't, ever.
Hello there!
avatar
hedwards: People shouldn't have to be on the look out for these sorts of things, they should be able to trust that MS is going to do the right thing. But, then again, when has MS ever done the right thing? They're pretty much poster boys for abusive practices followed with little or no punishment.
Will have to double check the default settings (and their description) when the next computer in the house asks to update, but I do recall that I didn't have to dig that hard to find it. It did say something to the tune of "Click next if you want personalized ads", but memory is faulty.
But yes, if you go "Next, Next, Next, Install" in the installation screens, you will run into trouble, no matter what you install.
avatar
Gilozard: Yeah, but I can see why people are upset over having an OS tracking you in that way. OSes have a lot more power and access than a single website. There's tools to manage Amazon or Google tracking like No Script, but that can't really work with the OS.
You are right. You wouldn't want your OS to be the one to announce to your father that you are pregnant after all.
(link for clarification)
Post edited July 30, 2015 by JMich
avatar
Klumpen0815: I'm glad that I opted out from M$ products after WinXP...
Seriously, why do people just swallow this sh**?
Not even "out of convenience" is a proper argument anymore since it isn't convenient at all.
avatar
triple_l: What is the alternative?

Mac? for the rich yes
Chrome? more power to google and make us even more dependent?
Linux? for the desktop?
How do I know a piece of hardware will run with linux?
Also how about all my legacy software from windows?
And finally a UI that is pleasantly aesthetic and familiar?
Even the more ugly windows desktop like Win3 or Win8 are so much better compared to the best Linux GUI

windows has 90% desktop market share not cause its great, but cause there is no alternative
Linus, is that you mate?

Take the average Joe and give him a PC with a popular distro installed and Cinnamon DE with an XP/7 theme. Average Joe will not notice that he has Linux until he will try to install some crap that will not work.
I was actually a bit naughty and dual-booted it a few days before release.

Honest thoughts after a short time using it:

- Not as bad as 8 seemed to be (my experiences with the latter were painful), but that's not exactly high praise.
- Disliking the amount of hoops you have to jump through to deselect the data collection and ignore creation of an MS account to log in and such.
- Might be a taste thing (not claiming to have a good one), but I find the squared off corners and overall aesthetic rather bland, especially coming from 7. I personally find 7's aesthetic much more attractive, even if transparency and such are probably technically negatives due to the resource requirements.
- Lack of control over updates, even as an option. There's just something I like about 7 in being able to search for, and look through, what the updates are and choose whether to install them and when.
- Didn't seem any faster than 7 on the same system. Might have even been slower, but it was hard to tell.

Overall, I see no compelling reason to upgrade permanently, and in fact I'm that apathetic about it I am struggling to feel compelled to even bother trying it out much more than I have already.
Post edited July 30, 2015 by EuroMIX
avatar
EuroMIX: I was actually a bit naughty and dual-booted it a few days before release.
snip
How did you do it?
Post edited July 30, 2015 by ashwald
avatar
Gilozard: 1) What part of 'average users can't use or won't know about separate admin tools and forum scripts' and 'downloading and configuring lots of crap makes life hard to IT staff' is hard for you to understand? At this point I can only assume that you are deliberately ignoring my point.
avatar
JMich: Having worked in IT, here are the possible scenarios
1) Your users are incompetent bufoons. Your IT guy sets the computers, and he makes sure they are set up correctly. Automatic Updates will be set to on.
2) Your users are competent tech users. They ask the IT guys to set the computers to their liking.
3) Your IT is incompetent. You are screwed.

avatar
Gilozard: 2) Fair enough - but most users aren't able to adapt to significant visual changes, since they rely on visual cues to tell them what to do. And sometimes the changes aren't solely visual, they're actual changes to workflows which is a whole other ball of ugly wax. Until you've had to walk a middle-aged manager though accessing the file server for the 5th time, you really don't understand how hard computers are for some people.
avatar
JMich: I have. A background in education does help, since you shouldn't tell them "Click this icon" but explain what they are looking for, and where it may be found. If you lack the patience, the "Give me 5 minutes and I'll do it myself" is a valid solution as well.

avatar
Gilozard: 3) Yeah, and that's helpful. But it's still not the same as the easy, obvious Win7 functionality of Let People Install Their Own Crap.
avatar
JMich: Group Policy Editor has existed for more than 15 years. Anyone who wishes to call himself an expert on computing should really be aware of it.

avatar
Gilozard: Also, group policies need all the computers to be in a group.
avatar
JMich: ? You mean the Workgroup "WORKGROUP"? Because that's the only group my computer is on, no domain, nor anything else.

avatar
Gilozard: TL;DR Speaking as an overworked IT admin, WIn10 does not look like a good bet at this point. The Update changes are on a long list of items that mean I'm going to lose time I can't afford just to get people back to productivity, for no real feature gains that anyone here cares about.
avatar
JMich: Go to MDL, spend a couple of weeks reading, then deploy Win10 in one sweep. If you are the IT admin, you should be the one that says when Win10 is ready to be installed, unless the "IT admin" is just a title, and someone else makes the decisions. In that case, you have my sympathy.

P.S. Disable the admin account and give the people a restricted one. Will save you quite a bit of headaches, especially if you reply to any requests about programs with "That may be a security risk, please file a formal request so I can check it, and if it passes inspection, I may install it".
There are a lot of people who aren't computer savvy at all but who are also not incompetent buffoons. Do you also know how to perform heart surgery, publish a textbook, and write a legal argument? No? OK then. People specialize. Often, their specialty does not involve knowing how computers work. I've done customer support for years, and sometimes people just don't or won't remember. But I still have to make sure those people can do their job, without their job turning into my job. It's a balancing act. :/

We are on automatic updates. Seriously, the real problem with update adoption is that people refuse to turn off their PCs, so the updates never get a chance to finish installing.

As for the rest - we're suffering from a combination of 'previous IT was incompetent / uninterested' and 'New IT can't do everything for everyone while also developing mission-critical software'. And yeah, I'm not the one who makes the final decisions. We also don't have any formal processes (see: previous IT was uninterested in this stuff).

Win10 shows that MS's strategic direction is one I don't really agree with - so I don't particularly want Win10 at all, although some of the features seem nice - and I really don't have time to manage an upgrade right now. I may revisit after the October update that's supposed to polish stuff up. We do need to stay with modern operating systems.
Post edited July 30, 2015 by Gilozard
avatar
cogadh: Yes it does affect indexing. Since any shortcuts outside that 512 limit cannot be displayed on the start menu, they get dropped from the index. The directories those shortcuts point to will get indexed, so you can still launch things by going directly to the executable in the file browser through search.
That's what I thought, I just deleted over 1000 things from the start menu that were pretty useless so now it should be good once it's re-indexes. Thanks!
avatar
Gilozard: There are a lot of people who aren't computer savvy at all but who are also not incompetent buffoons. Do you also know how to perform heart surgery, publish a textbook, and write a legal argument? No? OK then. People specialize. Often, their specialty does not involve knowing how computers work. I've done customer support for years, and sometimes people just don't or won't remember. But I still have to make sure those people can do their job, without their job turning into my job. It's a balancing act. :/
I'm sorry, did you just compare running a script to heart surgery? Because being unable to run a script does make you an incompetent buffoon. Finding the script may be a bit harder, but that's why you ask for help if required.

avatar
Gilozard: We are on automatic updates. Seriously, the real problem with update adoption is that people refuse to turn off their PCs, so the updates never get a chance to finish installing.
Scheduled tasks to the rescue. Reboot every Saturday at 23:59. Notify the users, ask them if they'd rather have the reboot at a different time. Or just say that every midnight the computers will reboot.