Posted December 27, 2023
Banned for not knowing that he was talking about this.
Banned because the reason they did that was because in some parts of Asia, 9 is considered an unlucky number, and they were afraid that it wouldn't sell well there; also, they had been working on a version 9, which was really glitchy, or otherwise rumored to be so, and it was hurting the reputation, so to fix these problems, they just renumbered it 10. What's really stupid is that they started out with more traditional version numbers, i.e. 3.1, then moved onto 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista, and also separately from that, they did NT through about 4.0, and then version 5.0 was actually 2000, even though that number would have suggested that it was an upgrade to 98, but it wasn't really, and then they started making Windows Server 2003, etc. So really, how is Windows 7 really the seventh version? In what way were there six versions before it? Is it something esoteric within the way the kernel is structured that nobody even knows about outside of Microsoft?
Banned because the reason they did that was because in some parts of Asia, 9 is considered an unlucky number, and they were afraid that it wouldn't sell well there; also, they had been working on a version 9, which was really glitchy, or otherwise rumored to be so, and it was hurting the reputation, so to fix these problems, they just renumbered it 10. What's really stupid is that they started out with more traditional version numbers, i.e. 3.1, then moved onto 95, 98, ME, XP, Vista, and also separately from that, they did NT through about 4.0, and then version 5.0 was actually 2000, even though that number would have suggested that it was an upgrade to 98, but it wasn't really, and then they started making Windows Server 2003, etc. So really, how is Windows 7 really the seventh version? In what way were there six versions before it? Is it something esoteric within the way the kernel is structured that nobody even knows about outside of Microsoft?