It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
richlind33: Is this the same BeatriceElysia that was being encouraged by tinyE to follow you around and downvote all of your posts?

"Pathetic sacks and cunts", indeed. o.O
This true? Certainly puts an ironic spin on this thread if it is...
avatar
morolf: iirc they stated several years ago (!) that the rep system would soon be overhauled or entirely removed.
"Soon soon" or "Duke Nukem Forever" soon...
Post edited October 25, 2019 by GreasyDogMeat
avatar
richlind33: Is this the same BeatriceElysia that was being encouraged by tinyE to follow you around and downvote all of your posts?

"Pathetic sacks and cunts", indeed. o.O
avatar
GreasyDogMeat: This true? Certainly puts an ironic spin on this thread if it is...
I forget the precise thread but she admitted tinyE was feeding her nasty info re GameRager back when she was following him around demanding that he needed to be parma-banned. And tinyE recently admitted that there's a conspiracy to downvote everything GameRager posts.

Yeah, there's a lot of irony here, but it's disgusting and sick as well, IMO.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Is this the same BeatriceElysia that was being encouraged by tinyE to follow you around and downvote all of your posts?

"Pathetic sacks and cunts", indeed. o.O
I really don't want to drag this up and make this about her too much as it's unfair and against the rules, but I believe so. If you want to talk more I would welcome it via PM so as to not make this thread about criticizing OP too much.

(Also did Tiny truly ask others like her to follow me around and downrate my posts? It would explain a lot, then.....as when he got a leave once he said that i'd still go down in rep because "others also disliked me very much" as if he knew it would continue to happen.)


avatar
GameRager: Heck, it must be a tool/app...know why? Because some days I go down 5 rep, then get someone giving me rep for a good post/etc and immediately a few minutes after that I drop one more rep.
avatar
richlind33: A negative-equity gap. lol
Thanks for making me look up a new term, friend. ;)

==========================

avatar
morolf: iirc they stated several years ago (!) that the rep system would soon be overhauled or entirely removed.
A CDPR staffer also supposedly told another user(who told me) that they have no intention of removing the rep system.....I don't know why, though.
Post edited October 26, 2019 by GameRager
low rated
It done the same for me but added a little extra one, nag the blues until he is banned. Oh, I forgot he also tried to get people to chat with me about it so he could use it as evidence against me but alas that failed miserably. I smell rats,real quick.
Post edited October 26, 2019 by Tauto
low rated
avatar
wormholewizards: I hate downvoters, they are the worst of any kind. If you disagree with someone, say it to their face. I have no idea why GOG still retaining this outdated upvotes/downvotes style
They should allow just upvotes and also allow one to remove one if they hit the button accidentally, and also perhaps limit votes per day to a set amount.
============================

avatar
Tauto: It done the same for me but added a little extra one, nag the blues until he is banned.
If you mean Tiny, it wouldn't work much, as he very likely has his network of "friends" he has leaked poison into the ears of who downvote for him when he is not here.
Post edited October 26, 2019 by GameRager
low rated
Yep, it must be correct as you are always correct on everything you comment on and it must be a slight handicap being so intelligent in a place like this.
Beatrice, you have been around here long enough that you should know:
1. there are trolls
2. you have just given your trolls the satisfaction of showing that they have annoyed you
3. rep doesn't mean anything

Just ignore it.
low rated
avatar
Tauto: Yep, it must be correct as you are always correct on everything you comment on and it must be a slight handicap being so intelligent in a place like this.
Read the above posts by richlind for more proof, if you don't trust me for some reason.

(Is it because I said Tiny makes some good posts in the past, or because I criticized your posts a few times? If so you need to learn to let it go, as it will just make you into one of those you dislike.

BTW I like you being here and a good number of your posts, and miss when we talked without quarreling.....I wish we could go back to that sometimes.)

======================

avatar
Lifthrasil: Beatrice, you have been around here long enough that you should know:
1. there are trolls
2. you have just given your trolls the satisfaction of showing that they have annoyed you
3. rep doesn't mean anything

Just ignore it.
Top 5 post ITT
Post edited October 26, 2019 by GameRager
low rated
avatar
Lifthrasil: Beatrice, you have been around here long enough that you should know:
1. there are trolls
2. you have just given your trolls the satisfaction of showing that they have annoyed you
3. rep doesn't mean anything

Just ignore it.
You see "trolls", I see a pathology that leaves people incapable of self-reflection, which consigns them to perpetual ignorance and self-destruction.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: You see "trolls", I see a pathology that leaves people incapable of self-reflection, which consigns them to perpetual ignorance and self-destruction.
Some are that way(in general, not just here), but some are also likely just trolls who are totally aware of what they are doing and how bad they are and do it anyways.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: You see "trolls", I see a pathology that leaves people incapable of self-reflection, which consigns them to perpetual ignorance and self-destruction.
avatar
GameRager: Some are that way(in general, not just here), but some are also likely just trolls who are totally aware of what they are doing and how bad they are and do it anyways.
They're two ways of describing the very same thing, one of which is a form of dehumanization, and one which isn't.

You can be dead certain that some here consider you to be a "troll", so I'll ask you: does it feel good to be dehumanized?
low rated
avatar
richlind33: They're two ways of describing the very same thing, one of which is a form of dehumanization, and one which isn't.
If the term fits and the people deserve it(and I mean actually deserve it) then it should be used. As I have said before I usually am not one to mince words in many cases. I also don't worry about being on the correct seat on the word carousel...if someone is deserving of such terms I use them.....simple as.

Also no, they are not(imo) the same thing.....I can more easily forgive those who are just stubbornly choosing to believe someone is bad than I can one who is doing it with full knowledge the person isn't as they say/deserving of such attention.

avatar
richlind33: You can be dead certain that some here consider you to be a "troll", so I'll ask you: does it feel good to be dehumanized?
I care less about the term being used and more it being used incorrectly with regards to me(and others sometimes)/to paint me in a false light. I don't come here to troll, and have been the victim of trolling elsewhere so I know what true trolling is.....what I do(state blunt opinions sometimes or post on certain topics) isn't(imo) trolling as per the definition.
Post edited October 26, 2019 by GameRager
low rated
avatar
mystikmind2000: I am no mental health expert, but the exact opposite could be true and help them by way of 'desensitization' ... so the person will be more able to handle aggravations in real life?
avatar
LootHunter: It all depends on the particulars of mental condition. And as GameRager said, there should be someone who watches over your activity. Both to control the exposure and emotional support.

P.S. Just now had -10 rep for simply posting in cretain thread.
For a person who is capable of independent living - Having someone watching over you is a bit creepy, what i think you meant to say is that the person with the mental health issue arms themselves with the advice given to them by their mental health practitioner.
low rated
avatar
mystikmind2000: For a person who is capable of independent living - Having someone watching over you is a bit creepy, what i think you meant to say is that the person with the mental health issue arms themselves with the advice given to them by their mental health practitioner.
Many do it every day with sponsors in AA and other groups(which is what I think that user meant when they said "watching"), actually.

Also mental health people mainly exist nowadays to dole out pills or just listen and not much else, or so it seemed from all the ones I went to over the years.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: They're two ways of describing the very same thing, one of which is a form of dehumanization, and one which isn't.
avatar
GameRager: If the term fits and the people deserve it(and I mean actually deserve it) then it should be used. As I have said before I usually am not one to mince words in many cases. I also don't worry about being on the correct seat on the word carousel...if someone is deserving of such terms I use them.....simple as.

Also no, they are not(imo) the same thing.....I can more easily forgive those who are just stubbornly choosing to believe someone is bad than I can one who is doing it with full knowledge the person isn't as they say/deserving of such attention.

avatar
richlind33: You can be dead certain that some here consider you to be a "troll", so I'll ask you: does it feel good to be dehumanized?
avatar
GameRager: I care less about the term being used and more it being used incorrectly with regards to me(and others sometimes)/to paint me in a false light. I don't come here to troll, and have been the victim of trolling elsewhere so I know what true trolling is.....what I do(state blunt opinions sometimes or post on certain topics) isn't(imo) trolling as per the definition.
"Incorrectly"? It's entirely subjective! o.O

Ask Lifthrasil if he thinks the people downvoting all of *your* posts are "trolls". I rather doubt it, and I think your ingratiation is serving you very poorly. This behavior is pathological, not rational.