jpinsa: I have to agree. I haven't been at GOG as long as some of you guys, and I do really love the site, but GOG needs to become a little better at PR. There is almost NO activity on this site besides Tue and Thu. Business is business and if you want the customers, you have to keep there attention or they may wander.
I personally wouldn't mind seeing more updates in the way of:
List of games and publishers in the works (even if they don't come off) e.g We tried to get Lucas Arts, EA etc and it just didn't work, then everybody knows.
I'm not much for the whole "we've got a really cool game coming out on Thu but it's a secret".
Also, big one for me! I hardly ever see GOG team replying on threads such as this one, where there is a direct question, in fact I have seen some threads up to 5 pages with a save problem in the game and no answer from GOG?
GOG view the excitement of surprise releases as something that draws attention. They have stated this before on the forum. When you check the site and see X game is up, and it's a game you want, you are excited and immediately buy it. Gaming blogs and news sites report it because it is a surprise, a sudden development people are excited about. If they had a list of games coming soon and when they will release you might not check the site until the one you want comes out and you won't be as pumped, maybe you will wait to buy it.
There are certainly downsides to this strategy like people getting bored of waiting for a release they want and not checking the site as often, but then the gaming news sites would probably bring them back when a game they want comes out. It's all kind of logical when you think about it.
That said if Impulse, Gamersgate and other such sites get more and more into releasing classics and release them sooner than GOG, well, that could be an issue. If another site puts a classic up that I want and it's DRM free I am not a loyalist, I will buy the game there.