.Ra: Not a fan of galaxy but it isn't bloat, it is pretty light. I also don't get your point about the functionality options, how are options ever a bad thing? That seems like grasping at straws to fit a more hidden agenda you may have.
Telika: When I really want a silent computer, I get one without fans and moving parts, not one that is promised to be very silent or which fan seldom turns on when it's new. It's the same issue that brings up the forumer who doesn't want to launch excel to make a simple calculation. I'm thinking of not using facebook as a text editor. Or not using Premiere/FinalCut to edit a sound. Automated updates, stats sent home, newsfeed, automated social logging, chatroom and multiplayer availability, achievements, background running, all nuisances that require turning off (I'm used, on other softs/systems, to have to turn back off what can be and what gets turned back on at new updates or changes of policies, it's very annoying), plus the very principle of game management, of gaming "client", that is the whole interface of presentation of game icons in an integrated launcher, is a thing I profoundly dislike (I launch my games like regular softs by clicking on regular icons in regular folders, it works well enough thank you). So, at the end, one big useless software, filled with annoying functionalities to keep checking and turning off, all this to use one basic function that used to be available independantly.
And there, the fact we go from "
aaah baah galaxy is not truly obligatory if you accept the deliberately increased drawbacks of alternatives" to "
hey maybe galaxy get a bit unavoidable but it's not that annoying anyway". And that's what I'm talking about. Galaxy imposed. Local culture making it something pointless to reject. It's exactly the norms set by Steam, now more and more fully embraced by GOG and its community. It's the sort of bullshit that many people came here to avoid, but now here is its home aswell. So.
Gogrepo works well enough (not well enough for, for instance, keeping only a subset of installers updated, but well enough globally). No need to witness anymore the trash that GOG has become, and the level of hypocrisy that runs through there. Those who complain for GOG to change its mind about gogdownloader are deluded (the point of GOG's choices is to have everybody use Galaxy, and that's it). Those who see no problem with that are those who fully integrated the norm of client interfaces. I haven't been posing to change anything. Just to point out the denial in the "GOG is all about freedom of choice" narrative, inherited from its different beginnings.
You can love or hate Galaxy. But claiming that GOG is honestly open to using or not using it is a shameful lie, maintained only by GOG PR and ridiculous fans. I won't be there to witness the next pointless microdrama, at the next pro-galaxy restriction, the next shift away from the original GOG, but I'm amused by the fact the same arguments will be used, splitting the so-called community between Steam-formatted gamers and yet another smaller subset of GOG nostalgics.
I have defended GOG earlier, claiming myself that Galaxy was no big deal because merely optional. And assuming, long ago, the good will of GOG's staff. It took a lot of time for me to progressively realise I was wrong. So I belong to this "fuck you guys" batch. Others belong to the next one. Others belonged to previous ones. An each time larger bewildered part belong to none. Enjoy, I guess.
Right, but you are still putting money in their pockets. That isn't going to help...