FlockeSchnee: I apologize for post 121.
Apology accepted. Let's talk like adults.
Look, I get it. The whole thing is sketchy as fuck and I'm not going to blame anyone for being suspicious, even though I'm sure they can voice their suspicions in a more constructive manner than comparing me to killers or insinuating that I created a mess for gog. Sorry, gog created a mess, I just pointed my finger and said "Look, guys, a mess! Better clean this up". Or, to quote Reservoir Dogs: "I didn't create the situation, I'm dealing with it."
I'm aware that making a gloating thread in the forum is neither subtle nor discreet. But ask any forum regular and they will confirm to you that gog has a massive communication and transparency problem (look no further than post#101 for a perfect example of lacking communication skills - that post being high rated, despite dismissing a serious issue, completely blows my mind). Gog won't admit to anything going wrong until there is some ruckus about it. And since this is a rather concerning issue, I figured I'd rather let everyone know instead of keeping things under wraps by contacting support and hoping for the best. With the exception of the blue posts in this thread, I haven't heard back from gog since I opened this thread 6 days ago. Which kind of confirms I made the right call telling everyone on the forum right away.
Also, regarding your concerns about the ethics of taking screenshots of the other guy's library: I actually agree. I also agree that posting from someone else's account without their permission is unethical. Under normal circumstances. But given the outrageous nature of my claims, I'm sure people would need some hard evidence. Evidence that can't just be handwaved away. To use your own example: Someone leaves their door open. Now, let's say that this person is a friend and a very special brand of bonehead. So after finding his door open, I tell him "Dude, you left your door wide open!". Bu that person won't believe my story and replies with "I’ve completed a thorough analysis and I did not identify any open doors. According to the investigation, no such situation has ever happened to date, and we can assure you my apartment is safe." If I was smart enough to secure evidence, I can put on my best trollface and go "OHRLY?!" and show him the pictures from inside his apartment. At that point, even they should realise that there is something very, VERY wrong going on.
So, in the interest of full disclosure: I accessed the forum and the wishlist, but that was before I realised that I was in someone else's account - gog's logs should probably confirm that the stuff that was accessed around that time was much more in line with my browsing habits than the Chinese guy's. After finding out I was in someone else's account, I accessed the guy's library and his wishlist - to find out whether that was even possible and to gather evidence in the form of screenshots. Speaking of ethics, the contents of users' libraries is something that gog all to happily makes public at any turn of the way - something I vocally opposed on this very forum numerous times in the past. And I stand by what I said in my first post, I did NOT access any sensitive personal information (i.e. checking out anything you'd find under "Your wallet" or "Privacy & Settings"). I'm sure gog will happily back me up on everything I said.
Ultimately, it's very much a take-it-or-leave-it situation. Either you (not you personally, but everyone reading this) believe my story or you don't. Whichever you choose makes no difference to me. Besides, even if you believe the story, there is little you yourselves can do apart from staying vigilant and reporting any irregularities. You either get affected by this glitch or you don't. The only party who should REALLY be listening is gog. Did I mention I haven't heard from them about this issue in 6 days?