Alexim: Unfortunately, this is a normal practice in all modern mmorpg which is spreading in all online games with microtransactions.
StingingVelvet: Yeah, hardly a new thing for an always online game, sadly. And yeah, we should enjoy singleplayer offline games (with a huge budget) while they exist, because I bet they won't much longer.
I've sort of been thinking this for a while. Even Diablo is rumored to become an mmoarpg in the next iteration. It sort of is now for PC if you count the always on factor.
Breja: That's the real problem here. I'm not even mad at the publishers. I remember seeing some study recently that showed only something like 6% of gamers are opposed to microtransactions and don't partake in them at all. At this point it's hard to expect publishers not to milk gamers for all they can - apparently the majority is practically begging for it.
ApexProcyon: Exactly, how many companies turn down what's basically profit without investment? If the consumers are willing to pay for nothing over and over again, the companies will gladly provide.
Guys, I've been whining about this for like 10 years now. I remember periodically being told I was overreacting, and most gamers blatantly ignoring me.
It's like paying a whore for sex and then a women's rights group comes along and says you shouldn't pay the whore, but she's a nympho and enjoys sex, so you pay her, only in this case, gamers are the nympho, and they're paying the john for sex.
I know it doesn't make sense, but gaming by its nature is a very "throw your money in a trashcan and burn it" hobby and has been ever since the first wave of DLC's was bought hungrily about 10 years ago. I don't blame the publishers anymore. It's not their fault that gamers are hungry to be wallet sexed. Some gamers wear like a badge of pride how much money they spend on microtransactions. It's embarrassing.