It always depends on how much you are willing to pay. And in the end, 80% of the fruit and vegetable stuff in German supermarkets is from European countries anyway ;) 20% local produce, depending on region, and pricier.

I certainly have rarely problems with food quality in Germany.... but then I live in a region that produces meat and vegetables locally, so quality is above average to me. No idea how it is in other regions.

I see you are still good at upkeeping the conversation your style. Well, comrade, let's play. :-)
Was it ever about Russian army? "The whole world" needs to fear it no more than it did a year ago - they didn't spit in the well. However, our southern neighbors are so hyped about it that they see it everywhere even when it's not really there. Oh well.
Last I checked Yatsenyuk was still the PM. Well, at least he's still as vocal as he used to be: http://www.forexlive.com/blog/2014/08/08/ukraine-may-ban-gas-transit-to-europe-as-part-of-sanctions-8-august-2014/
While we're at it, could you please remind the audience which parties were responsible for his propositions not getting a pass? What is "Svoboda"? I thought the nationalists weren't deciding anything in your parliament... were they?
And no, USA have totally no hand in the matter. It was North Korea who spent $5 bln on "helping the democracy in Ukraine", it was Kim Jong-il who dispatched his chief of Intelligence Agency to Kiev, it's North Korea who fling apeshit in the general direction of Russia but go all mysteriously quiet when asked to provide some solid proof to their accusations. Should I continue? I'm curious how you will psaki out of this. :-)
I like how you mix up boycotting all food import and boycotting certain food import from certain countries. If it's possible this isn't any trouble to Europe, well, meh, will it be to Russia? Turkey, Belorussia, China, LA countries aren't banned from the market last I checked so... :-p
No, I'm not saying the prices won't rise (you give those buggers who call themselves businessmen an excuse, they'll suck you dry), but nothing too dramatic. So sorry, the show's cancelled, nothing to see here.

Yeah, I guess I did mix foods together ;p It was largely based on an article from Spiegel Online ^^

Did anyone else hear the recent announcement that Ukraine wants to block all gas transfer to Europe? That's gonna make them many friends here. (I don't think they'll do it ,p)

Thats correct, your fantasy looks dry and exhausted. Dragging a Psaki's name into conversation with people, who are mostly totally unaware about lame fake "translations" of her due to theyr inability to dig into Russian, so even wouldnt get what you're about is quite a sign.

What exact problem with it? By now they just announced such possibility another time, and the possibility itself was quite obvious long ago.

Sorry man, one of us probably should have some sort of amnesia here. Im definitely cannot recall discussing your fantasies in general sense, or personally Psaki prior. I do recall what you tried to play some fool, and asked for some confirmations in past, thats correct, and kept the same line after you had got them, thus making me wonder for what use you asked for them from start. And yes, i recall what you claimed to have position "lets wait and see" in past, but, puzzling enough again, contradict you own declarations with discussing on a subject instead of performing the proposed "sitting quietly and waiting". Described behavior could lead to conclusion what you dont bother about any weight or creditability of your words even for yourself, so, obviously there is even less reason to do care about them for others. So, as you still proposing "wait and see" as a preferred way, please follow it, and keep the place clear from a ghosts in your head, there is already quite many other people with rich inner world here. Or you're simply unable to control your doublethink?
I cant say what im really curious, as some game forum's thread about non-existing thing isnt a place for some deep expectations involved, but i guess they surely would do it eventually, right. How come it was connected to me btw, there was clearly written "Did anyone else", not "I would be interested in some comment by Ukrainian" or smth, in which case i wouldnt dare to post anything. But it somehow happend what i meet the requirement given in a case.

oh really ?:) And Crimea wasn't invaded by it ?:)

nope, it's still your fantasy - there were no parliament re-election yet so most of it is sadly pro-russian but scared enough by Maidan to vote for at least most of laws.

first that's 5 million, not 5 billion, second - ukrainians asked for help for quite some time from US first, because, you know, russian soldiers/GRU/chechens invaded Crimea and east of our country. And, btw, the claim that Crimea is russian is total BS - if we want to restore historical justice it should have been gone to Turkey.

As for going apeshit - pro-russian terrorists were preventing international investigation for days there, while ukrainian soldiers were doing everythign possible to help. What kind of proof you need ?

I understand that you're getting your news from sites like rt.com and lenta.ru and i totally get why you're thinking like that - that shit they write is scary, but fortunately, has nothing to do with reality, common sense or logic.


EDIT: fixed quotations.

Here we go again. So is Ukraine "the whole world"? It's no secret that you are afraid of the Russian military, but I still fail to see why, say, Switzerland or Germany would be.
Regarding the question, two words: Naval base. We were paying you for the "invasion" for, like, years if not decades. Hmph, fine, I'll do the homework this time. Would you kindly read this till the words "The immediate trigger for Yatsenyuk’s resignation was the decision by the Svoboda and Udar parties earlier Thursday to pull out of the coalition government"? So... my fantasy or Washington Post's one? More homework left to me. Oh well.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/american-conquest-by-subversion-victoria-nulands-admits-washington-has-spent-5-billion-to-subvert-ukraine/5367782
If we want to restore historical justice, you say? Look, I found [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine#mediaviewer/File:Location_of_Cossack_Hetmanate.png]an interesting picture[/url]. Of course, it has nothing to do with historical justice, now does it? (Beg pardon for giving you a taste of your own medicine)

Yes, yes, that's why they are shelling the territory in close proximity to the crash site at the moment. It does help, ask the investigators. And would you kindly stop the "everyone knows that, 'murica says so, what more of a proof are you talking about?"?

Alas, you missed. Mostly it's Interfax.ru, inosmi.ru with an occasional droplet of youtube (keeping in mind that I don't always know where the videos came from so I don't take everything for granted).

If I may ask, what's your favorite poison, censor.net or hromadske.tv (yep, stereotypes here. Sorry, couldn't resist. But seriously, where do you get your news)?

Well, for ones whos by some mystery are interested with modern capability of working with open data sources there could be some interest in work of some Holland guy, who aggregate the public data available on a subject, and trying to do something with it http://ukraineatwar.blogspot.com . Seriously, redundantly bashing the conventional media outlets for non-creditability its just a sort of special olympics for long time already. Way what looks more relaiable, is looks for facts, not just for "relevant source". If the source is relevant indeed - it work with same facts still, and if it making non-facts on its own - its not reliable source.

Ah well, srry http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch.ca cant resist.

so paying rent justifies invasion ? That's the most idiotic thing i've heard in quite some time, good job :) Would you be ok with me kicking you out of your house if i'll pay you rent for let's say 13 years just because i think that's ok ?

and how exactly that proves huge influence of Svoboda you were talking earlier ?:)

it says in past two decades, pretty much since USSR has (luckily) collapsed. And how is that even relevant ?

No, go on. You do remember that neither siberia, nor Kazan nor Astrakhan were part of Russia before Ivan Groznyi conquered them ?:)

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-06/clashes-between-ukrainian-forces-rebels-continue-in-donetsk/5651206
http://mashable.com/2014/07/19/separatists-mh17-investigation/
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/18/mh17-crash-pro-russia-rebels-block-access-ukraine
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10977705/MH17-separatists-block-international-observers-from-crash-site.html

so all sources above are lying (top 5 from google,didn't even had to try hard), and interfax is correct, right ?:) and i don't think i have to stop anything - it' s you who claims that you know better what happens in my country than i do

censor.net, 24tv.ua, and bloggers/friends from donetsk and luhansk. Occasionally russian media too, but 99% of them has flavor of "we're best nation of the world, we are right and rest of the world is wrong" which makes them hard to read.

and there was literally nothing wrong with hromadske.tv and censor.net last time i've checked (few idiotic news aside). Care to elaborate on them ?
hehe. I haven't even checked that. If all Sanjuro sources are like that i may as well stop even opening them, none of them besides that single historical picture were accurate.

No-no, not all in any way, but yes, he express some signs of goldconspiracy-reptiloidsmafia-NODsect more often than its justified for decent people indeed, what contradicting with the fact what he's definitely much better than your typical sectarian, so i guess he just trying to act as nut sometimes, if it would work for his case, instead of actually being one.

There aren't only "the aluminum hats" and "blind slaves of society", there is a lot in between.
Some theories are true and some are not.
People claiming that there are no conspiracies at all anywhere are just as nuts as someone expecting them everywhere if you ask me.

To quote Walter Ulbricht 1961:

Of course there is a conspiracies. But here we're about reliability of sources, and theyr ability to operate with given facts, not about disapproval of any possibly conspiracy theory by default.

i have a feeling that most are not :) Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.