It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
LiquidOxygen80: What most of us middle of the road people want is simple: use your right to ignore....
You want lawyers to starve, you hater?!?!? lol
high rated
avatar
LiquidOxygen80: What most of us middle of the road people want is simple: use your right to ignore....
avatar
richlind33: You want lawyers to starve, you hater?!?!? lol
WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE...lawyers?
low rated
avatar
richlind33: You want lawyers to starve, you hater?!?!? lol
avatar
LiquidOxygen80: WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE...lawyers?
I do,every time I go to court.
Another one bites the dust.

Have the GOGbear circlejerkers won?
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Off-topic: that's a paddlin'.
Now you're just offering incentive...
low rated
The "wish" to close gamergate thread has 139 votes, just check how many other votes have other issues... very sad GOG veeeeery sad, I am not a gamer gate supporter but definitively I am a supported of free speech, and your argument of that thread full of "mysoginists" is just BS BIG BS, and you are falling in the establishment, and the pure fascism of "good" ideas pushed by force. All your arguments about a "parking" and no follow rules... well Mr., blame the ones that don´t follow the rules, not SILENCE a whole thread that has good and bad arguments on both sides just because you are afraid of the pushing force consequences. As the topic by "IT"self didn´t break any rule...

avatar
johnnygoging: the forum was always, in many ways an extension of the philosophies that you see from the company that created it, a place that was a little freer, a little looser, than many others like it. certainly those others of an official and not entirely independent or unaffiliated nature. this was never historically a problem because though this atmosphere was not strictly controlled, the freedom and faith in the users generally produced a place where well-meaning and thoughtfulness won out and it more or less self-moderated. you'd always see stuff you might not in a moderated environment, but it always steered clear of harassment, personal attacks, disruptive behaviour, and generally anything that would have a negative effect. to be sure, there were politics, but they didn't sour the forum for lots of people. they existed, the forum existed, it wasn't a problem. then a few idiots showed up and started poisoning the place. with no stopgaps and less or no zero-tolerance policies for things that you'd normally find them for in those previously mentioned other places, combined with a certain amount of persistence for the idiocy from the idiots, the ph level of the forum started to change subtly until one day you started to see the veterans dropping like flies. that's pretty much what happened as far as I'm concerned. maybe it was inevitable that as gog gained greater awareness that something like this would happen, and maybe you see the ultimate solution as the implementation of a better rule framework. I'm not weighing in. I just wanted you to understand that it's not because the forum was fairly unregulated, it's because some people showed up and screwed it over.
avatar
fables22: Yes and no. The problem did arise from the fact that there was pretty much no regulation whatsoever, once those people showed up. To me the two are very much interconnected.
"hatespeech" is blame a whole community of being rapers, mysoginistics and the pure devil. First they came for the gamergaters, and I say nothing... one day they will come for you. You guys dissapojnted me DEEPLY to see in which game and kind of push force fall into... I wonder what you think when "the Witcher" was accused of "whitewashing"

This is being ridiculous and I dislike racists as much as cowards. One day maybe you guys will regret about what you are contributing in terms of stopping the "hate speech" as I said, first they came for the "gamergaters and I said nothing"

Good luck joining the internet mob that hunts witches in the night with torches. I never imagined that one day "leftists" would become such a RIGHTful force... but life still surprises me ...
Post edited June 12, 2017 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
dtgreene: I would argue that people tend to use the "it's just a joke" argument to get out of punishment. When the "joke" actively harms others, then that excuse should not be valid, and the post should be moderated, even if it's "just a joke". (So, for example, a "joke" about killing Jewish people, for example, would not be acceptable.)

There are plenty of clean jokes our there that wouldn't be offensive. In general, a joke that empowers its target, rather than denigrating it, is preferred.

"common sense" is sometimes outright wrong, so be careful. If you think X is true, and your reason is "common sense", you might want to look up whether it *is* true. This comes up *a lot* in controversial topics.
avatar
LiquidOxygen80: Except when someone who has a joking nature makes a joke about something, and has a history of irreverence towards all topics, why does that person deserve punishment to begin with? If your analogy is regarding someone who say, theoretically only makes jokes about Jews, or the color blue, for whatever reason, and let's say we live in a world where blue haters is deemed controversial, I'd understand your point. The perception people like you have laid, though, is that ANY jokes dealing with controversial subject matter should be punished, and not only should they be punished, you should find out their personal info and go on a crusade to ruin that person's life.

We're adults. We're not children. If something goes against my core values, I have the right to not give those things my time of day. I ignore it and move onto something in my life that does deserve my attention. I don't announce a massive intifada against blue haters and make it a mission to destroy all people who hate blue.

What most of us middle of the road people want is simple: use your right to ignore. Heck, feel free to express yourself in why you didn't like it, but stop labeling people who disagree with you as vile dregs of humanity, simply because they had the temerity to challenge your assertions.
Mr. you are so right.
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Good luck joining the internet mob that hunts witches in the night with torches.
Well, of course we hunt witches in the night with torches. Have you tried hunting witches at night without torches? It sucks, you can't see anything and keep running into trees and stuff.
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Good luck joining the internet mob that hunts witches in the night with torches.
avatar
Breja: Well, of course we hunt witches in the night with torches. Have you tried hunting witches at night without torches? It sucks, you can't see anything and keep running into trees and stuff.
Tress and stuff put there by the evil witches. Burn them!

Except we can't, because we don't have our torches. Damn.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Except we can't, because we don't have our torches.
Couldn't you just use a bit of witchcraft and cast a light spell?
avatar
HereForTheBeer: Except we can't, because we don't have our torches.
avatar
dtgreene: Couldn't you just use a bit of witchcraft and cast a light spell?
What, and admit I'm a witch myself?!?
avatar
dtgreene: Couldn't you just use a bit of witchcraft and cast a light spell?
avatar
HereForTheBeer: What, and admit I'm a witch myself?!?
What's so bad about being a witch?

I feel that witches, like so many other groups, have been unfairly maligned by the general population.
avatar
HereForTheBeer: What, and admit I'm a witch myself?!?
avatar
dtgreene: What's so bad about being a witch?

I feel that witches, like so many other groups, have been unfairly maligned by the general population.
What's so bad? I think this summed it up pretty well:
Good luck joining the internet mob that hunts witches in the night with torches.
Though Samantha Stephens never had to deal with any of that.
Well. Monty Python logic is great for Witchunters... so, "I close a whole thread because someone park a car in a place that says "cars might not be parked here" and because the other guy guarding the parking before, in fact, was´t really guarding the place, you know? that guy was doing nothing i believe... so the 139 votes of "close that mysoginist" lol thread has nothing to be with this... and probably some pushes here and there by that mob has nothing to be with it..."

I am just a policeman following the rules, so fuck those gamergaters I would hit them if i were had a policeman stick for being such devilish people...

Well one thing is true, 139 votes here is far to be a mob
Post edited June 12, 2017 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Good luck joining the internet mob that hunts witches in the night with torches.
avatar
Breja: Well, of course we hunt witches in the night with torches. Have you tried hunting witches at night without torches? It sucks, you can't see anything and keep running into trees and stuff.
Dastardly fiends might sneak up and drag one of the mob off too.


If only GOG could spend as half much time addressing legitimate concerns about the main site, like making clear what they consider DRM, as they do frittering it away on the forum over pointless nonsense. If they've addressed that or other concerns about the direction of the store and I've missed it, please link me.