It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Hikage1983: Co-signed as well.

I'm one of the nutters that still use a dedicated sound card. Nuff said.
Strangely enough, so am I! Strange, because I am no audiophile. It's just that the onboard sound stopped working, so I bought a soundcard to workaround.
avatar
teceem: A Flac encoding of an MP3 file is still lossless. Lossless says nothing about the "quality" of the audio. Though I don't see the point of doing such a thing.
Once the file has been encoded as an MP3, some of the audio data has been lost, and can't be recovered without the original audio data. Re-encoding it as FLAC is not going to somehow magically bring back the lost audio data.

In order to be able to have a truly lossless encoding, you need the original uncompressed audio, or a lossless encoding of such audio.

I note that the loss of quality might not be noticeable, but if you start re-encoding the same audio through multiple lossy codecs (like MP3 -> AAC -> OGG Vorbis -> OGG Opus, for example), quality is lost with each encoding, and it will start to be noticeable after a while. It's like making copies of copies of copies (etc.) of cassette tapes (remember those?).
avatar
teceem: A Flac encoding of an MP3 file is still lossless. Lossless says nothing about the "quality" of the audio. Though I don't see the point of doing such a thing.
avatar
dtgreene: Once the file has been encoded as an MP3, some of the audio data has been lost, and can't be recovered without the original audio data. Re-encoding it as FLAC is not going to somehow magically bring back the lost audio data.

In order to be able to have a truly lossless encoding, you need the original uncompressed audio, or a lossless encoding of such audio.

I note that the loss of quality might not be noticeable, but if you start re-encoding the same audio through multiple lossy codecs (like MP3 -> AAC -> OGG Vorbis -> OGG Opus, for example), quality is lost with each encoding, and it will start to be noticeable after a while. It's like making copies of copies of copies (etc.) of cassette tapes (remember those?).
I didn't say FLAC magically brings back lost audio data, I'm saying it's a lossless representation of it's source, whatever that source might be.
I can even think of a scenario where an MP3 can be of better quality than a wav file.
avatar
teceem: I can even think of a scenario where an MP3 can be of better quality than a wav file.
But can you think of a situation where the MP3 has better quality than the WAV file that it came from?
avatar
teceem: I can even think of a scenario where an MP3 can be of better quality than a wav file.
avatar
dtgreene: But can you think of a situation where the MP3 has better quality than the WAV file that it came from?
Sure, but in that case it's highly subjective. The MP3 file can be a remastered version of the WAV file.
It depends what you mean by "quality" - if it means "as identical as possible", then... no, of course not, it's inherently impossible.
Post edited September 23, 2018 by teceem
low rated
deleted
high rated
I would like to see FLAC versions of the mp3 provided with a soundtrack. Personally, I find the FLAC version more desirable, as I find it quite easy to convert to other formats myself, so the key is that the provided format is lossless. But if this only means that GOG (or someone else) is going to convert mp3 files into FLAC, then I consider it utterly pointless; such files are a waste of space and false advertisement, as far as I'm concerned.
Bah, MightyPinecone just stated what I wanted to say.
avatar
Fairfox: its tricky 'coz its naht cool to use dead names. yah, thats weird; seems archaic toooo go by cc name rather than wutevah you use for your bandcamp account name. i wondah why they did that.
I should point out that this happened without an account.
Dead Cells is one of the titles, for which I completely dismissed the soundtrack DLC, when I saw that it was mp3 only. FLAC, now you have my interest. Voted, though I doubt GOG would ever complete that wish, since there will always be new releases, and all it takes is one to mess it up.
low rated
avatar
Chacranajxy: Co-signed. MP3s are just dumb, at this point.
You'd be surprised how many deaf morons claim they can't tell the difference between FLAC and MP3.
low rated
deleted
Hey, it is not like I can really hear the difference on the remaining laptop speaker... Should be called squeaker by the way.
avatar
plagren: An actual issue with Bandcamp:
If the artist/label decides to remove a release from Bandcamp, it will also be removed from your collection. It'll still be streamable from their mobile app, but can't be downloaded.
Something that really grinds my gears. I won't name the game developer/composer who did this to a soundtrack I'd purchased, but it's a really crappy move to make (while I can respect it to an extent, I don't have to like it). The thing that was really galling in my instance was that I called the person out on it and they had the nerve to say "Sorry! You can always buy the vinyl!".
avatar
Crosmando: You'd be surprised how many deaf morons claim they can't tell the difference between FLAC and MP3.
At 256VBR/320CBR, I definitely can't. Failed every blind test I've tried. I rip everything to FLAC now since storage is cheap anyway and it's better to have a higher quality to go off of for backups/etc. but hell if I can tell.

I use 96kbps opus on my portable players which I'm sure is making people wince.
Post edited September 25, 2018 by saldite