It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Sorry guys, but with the total constitutional crisis we have here you're going to have a hard time impressing me with some asshat from Alabama.
It gets better. He has now outright said that the Supreme Court is subject to God's law over man's law, therefore the Obergefell ruling making gay marriage legal is invalid, because God said so. Yes folks, this is an elected official, sworn (with his hand on the Bible) to uphold the laws of the land. He might as well be pissing on the Constitution right now. Even if he still has any support within his state, he has basically thrown away his career... for the second time (he was removed from the bench once before, but somehow got re-elected).
Marriage is soooo 20th century!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: But doesn't impeachment at least suspend him until his guilt / innocence has been established? And no trial; but theoretically, can't he be dismissed now that he has admitted guilt? That's a confession in a proceeding against this guy, and guilt can be established by the courts with it; after which he can legally be dismissed? So what's stoppin anyone?
avatar
tinyE: When Bill Clinton was impeached I don't think he was suspended, but maybe I'm wrong.
OK impeachment may be a bit different there. There must be something to bar him from his job considering he used his tax funded position in the judiciary for something that is illegal though.
avatar
Klumpen0815: Marriage is soooo 20th century!
Many teachers have warned me against it.
Post edited January 07, 2016 by Shadowstalker16
low rated
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Won't the judge just be impeached?
Actually, the judge was removed from office after refusing to take down a 10 commandments monument. He was re-elected afterwords.

Edit: "s/impeached/removed from office"
Post edited January 07, 2016 by dtgreene
avatar
Klumpen0815: Marriage is soooo 20th century!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Many teachers have warned me against it.
Rightfully so. How could gaining legal ownership of your partner improve a relationship?
avatar
dtgreene: How long until a federal court steps in and tells the state court "No, you can't do this"?
The US Attorneys in that district issued a letter last night, not long after he went rogue, which as noted he has done before. I'll paraphrase the contents here: "you're dumb."

At least a few county officials have already said they're completely ignoring him.

My guess is he will be removed from office. Again.

EDIT: (at least some) text of the letter:
"The Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court has issued an administrative order, directing probate judges that they may not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's decision last year on marriage equality. We have grave concerns about this order, which directs Alabama probate judges to disobey the ruling of the Supreme Court. Government officials are free to disagree with the law, but not to disobey it. This issue has been decided by the highest court in the land and Alabama must follow that law."
Post edited January 07, 2016 by budejovice
avatar
dtgreene: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/01/06/alabama-same-sex-marriage/78363398/

(Other links can be found on the Internet.)

Alabama Supreme Court Justice Ray Moore has ordered that same sex marriage is illegal in Alabama. There is one problem: This directly contradicts the US Supreme Court's ruling last Summer that same sex marriage is legal.

To put it another way, the state supreme court has just made a ruling that contradicts the US Supreme Court.

How long until a federal court steps in and tells the state court "No, you can't do this"?

(Also, can anybody think of other good examples of judges defying the rulings of higher courts? For this to count, it has to be intentional; mistakes are not what I am looking for here.)

Edit: Also, I am pretty sure this isn't the first time Ray Moore has made this order.
Oh geez. Ray Moore is not a supreme court justice. Don't scare me like that - for a supreme court justice to declare that would mean there was a big loophole somewhere.

[EDIT] He is a justice of the Alabama supreme court - not the same thing as a supreme court justice.
Post edited January 07, 2016 by tremere110
avatar
Klumpen0815: Rightfully so. How could gaining legal ownership of your partner improve a relationship?
Actually, from what I've heard, a lot of people (in Germany, at least) take that step to gain some tax advantages and other legal nonsense that I have no idea of.
(Other than that, vowing you'll stick with one person until you die seems like an utterly romantic concept - if you don't look at it as "ownership", legal or otherwise. Not my kind of thing either, but hey!)
avatar
Klumpen0815: Rightfully so. How could gaining legal ownership of your partner improve a relationship?
avatar
Crackpot.756: Actually, from what I've heard, a lot of people (in Germany, at least) take that step to gain some tax advantages and other legal nonsense that I have no idea of.
I know, but this shouldn't be the reason.

avatar
Crackpot.756: Other than that, vowing you'll stick with one person until you die seems like an utterly romantic concept - if you don't look at it as "ownership", legal or otherwise. Not my kind of thing either, but hey!
You don't need the states permission for any vow and the official contract isn't really about this anymore anyway.
It's called "marriage contract" in Germany indeed by the way and that's not really romantic.
avatar
tinyE: In all fairness, this isn't politics, it's human rights.
avatar
Nirth: Problem is, as soon as you discuss what human rights should be it becomes a political issue.

As from someone who's never been to the US, is it true that Alabama is a backwards thinking state full of bigotry, racism and I guess fanatical christians? Whenever I see travels tips threads on the net and people mention the US there's always a few people that immediately says:
Whatever you do avoid the Bible Belt, sometimes pointing to Alabama as one of the core issues.
Yes, the south is filled with idiots. They vote against their own self-interest all the time. Mississippi is right there with Alabama. Probably the best two states to avoid. South Carolina just recently got rid of the confederate flag as their state flag. Just to give an idea of the complete stupidity here. NY times, I think it was, did a poll of people collecting some sort government payout, and over half did not even recognize that they were on such a program and were against them.

It's not so much fanatical christians as it is stupid people. As long as a person says or does stuff that is christian, religion is considered ok in this country. Infringe on the rampant christian stupidity, and all hell breaks loose with cries of political correctness and such. For instance, it is now common to say "Happy Holidays" by businesses instead of "Merry Christmas" because of the christian context, that's considered "a war on christmas". It's just stupid.
I'm not very familiar with US law but can a State Court go against the Supreme Court?
avatar
Siegor: I'm not very familiar with US law but can a State Court go against the Supreme Court?
No.
avatar
Siegor: I'm not very familiar with US law but can a State Court go against the Supreme Court?
No, but it doesn't prevent someone from being stupid.

[EDIT] ninja'd!
Post edited January 07, 2016 by tremere110
avatar
Klumpen0815: I know, but this shouldn't be the reason.
Not the reason, but a reason, if you're certain you'll be spending the rest of your life or, since marriage isn't even sacred anymore, a considerable amount of time, with your current partner.

avatar
Klumpen0815: You don't need the states permission for any vow and the official contract isn't really about this anymore anyway.
It's called "marriage contract" in Germany indeed by the way and that's not really romantic.
Nah, but the whole white dress/tuxedo ceremony thing with the music and the flowers and the vowing ... Gee, I thought I was cynical. :p