It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Xbox obviously. Can see the XYAB button prompts, provided CDPR doesn't use controllers for testing PC games.
I wouldn't be so sure. Remember recent video on Xbox channel? 60FPS - Xbone can't into 60FPS, so it obviously was PC footage. With controller. Recent media activity I gather also confirm controllers usage on PCs, as, ahem, PC controls aren't optimized yet. He-he. :D

avatar
Shadowstalker16: The interface is solid though. Delivers plenty of info with as little screen space as possible. And the map seems helpful; but a turn off map option may be nice if you wanna go exploring. Seems we have hp, stamina, mana and something else in the top left stat bars.
Interface basically the same as in Witcher 2, only fonts are bigger now, so your eyes shouldn't bleed that often.
Judging by previous games, I'd say we have XP bar, health bar, toxicity bar, endurance bar, and, maybe, sign empowerment bar (those three-sectioned bar)
My system:
Intel Core i5-4200m@2.5ghz
Nvidia GTX760M
12GB RAM

I'm okay with 720p & low graphics settings.

So can i be able to achieve 30fps with this laptop?

I assume minimum req for ps4 quality graphics (1080p medium i think)
avatar
Riotact: It came with The Order and Bloodborne free :P
avatar
CharlesGrey: So would I. I actually considered getting a PS4 to play Witcher and Bloodborne on, but I have a pretty decent PC and I'm a bit spoiled by PC gaming. Might still pick up a PS4 a few years down the road, when they're cheaper, and all the cool games are available as GOTY/Complete editions, for a few bucks each.

Still kind of pissed that Bloodborne ended up as a Sony exclusive. Seems to me that after the success of Dark Souls From Software would have done fine even without any financial help from Sony, and the game would have been available to more people ( PC... and XBone, I guess ). But for better or worse Sony and MS need good exclusives to push their systems, and they're willing to invest heavily to make that happen. Guess that's just the way it is.
Bloodborne was a giant let down. Easily the worst Souls game so far. Way too easy and linear.

Demon Souls > Dark souls > Dark souls 2 > Bloodborne
avatar
IMRavnos: Bloodborne was a giant let down. Easily the worst Souls game so far. Way too easy and linear.

Demon Souls > Dark souls > Dark souls 2 > Bloodborne
Umm... No.
Guys what would you say about this? What do you think about my rig? :D Can I run game on medium/high settings on 1680*1050 screen?

FX 6300 4 GHz
ASUS R9 280X DC2T-3GD (NOT OC)
8 GB Ram 2133 MHz. :P
Yes.
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Yes.
Thanks for answer :)
I hope it will works smoothly :D :)
avatar
Shadowstalker16: Yes.
avatar
Smrtak25: Thanks for answer :)
I hope it will works smoothly :D :)
The processor has great multithread capabilities and you have enough RAM and an above min-specced GPU. If you're playing at 1080p, the extra 1GB or so of VRAM the 280X has will come in handy on higher texture resolution settings and anything you run below 1080p should run like a dream on reasonably high AA and higher settings provided CDPR did good on their port. Remember to use more AMD friendly AA as well.
Well, I decided to wait for the 300 series of Radeon-cards. The seller of the 290 didn't have the warranty for it, which always is a nice thing to have. Hopefully, in the meantime, my HD 7850 1 GB edition will be able to pull TW3 on low settings on my 1680x1050-screen.

I could also overclock my CPU a little while waiting for DX12. I will see if I can find a good Noctua-cooler for it. But what determines the limit for how much it can be overclocked? I'm guessing it's not heat, as my friend is running his 4,8 Ghz OC'd CPU on 30 degrees Celsius under load, but his PC gets bluescreen if he clocks it to 5 Ghz.
Post edited May 11, 2015 by Random_Coffee
avatar
Smrtak25: Thanks for answer :)
I hope it will works smoothly :D :)
avatar
Shadowstalker16: The processor has great multithread capabilities and you have enough RAM and an above min-specced GPU. If you're playing at 1080p, the extra 1GB or so of VRAM the 280X has will come in handy on higher texture resolution settings and anything you run below 1080p should run like a dream on reasonably high AA and higher settings provided CDPR did good on their port. Remember to use more AMD friendly AA as well.
Thanks for your reply ;)
I'm playing at 1680*1050 screen :)

BTW just question but what means "more AMD friendy AA"? I'm not sure if I'm right now :)
@Smartak25I read it here:http://in.ign.com/pc/75649/feature/igndia-graphics-master-guide-all-graphics-settings?p=2

@Random_Coffee: Try to run it without OCing first. At 1680X1050, I think the 7850 will hold on lower settings without high AA. Good luck!
avatar
Shadowstalker16: @Smartak25I read it here:http://in.ign.com/pc/75649/feature/igndia-graphics-master-guide-all-graphics-settings?p=2

@Random_Coffee: Try to run it without OCing first. At 1680X1050, I think the 7850 will hold on lower settings without high AA. Good luck!
Thanks it was as I thought ;)
Been a while, but is there any expectation that the R9 290's will be dropping to a sub-$200 price point? I'm seeing them at around $250ish right now and hoping that's not going to be the bottom of the pricing.
avatar
Fomalhaut30: Been a while, but is there any expectation that the R9 290's will be dropping to a sub-$200 price point? I'm seeing them at around $250ish right now and hoping that's not going to be the bottom of the pricing.
I think that when new 3xx series will come out ,old 2xx series will go down about 80 bucks or so :)
Does anyone anticipate the GTX 860m being able to handle it? I've got got an alienware 13 which obvs. won't hit ultra but I anticipate med-high settings at 1080p (perhaps shadows on low)