Posted March 05, 2015

Splatsch
Birdy
Registered: Apr 2013
From France

HypersomniacLive
The Reluctant Voter
Registered: Sep 2011
From Vatican City

Splatsch
Birdy
Registered: Apr 2013
From France

Grargar
Insert cat to continue
Registered: Aug 2012
From Greece
Posted March 05, 2015
high rated
It's back again. Damn Schrödinger edition.

HypersomniacLive
The Reluctant Voter
Registered: Sep 2011
From Vatican City

Splatsch
Birdy
Registered: Apr 2013
From France

mrkgnao
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HCZVCTO
Registered: Apr 2009
From United States

Pidgeot
Sale Tracker
Registered: Dec 2009
From Germany
Posted March 05, 2015

It also seems wrong that XP is apparently supported, because that was 32-bit only - unless they mean the virtually unused 64-bit version of XP, but that seems like a stretch (and that one was really closer to Windows 2003 anyway).
Also, I'm pretty sure there isn't a 32-bit version of OS X 10.7 anyway, so the notice is rather pointless for that platform.
Post edited March 05, 2015 by Pidgeot

Kristian
New User
Registered: Sep 2008
From Faroe Islands
Posted March 05, 2015
So expect for the 64 bit version there was no 64 bit version of Windows XP? Rarity and non-existence are two very different things.

Lord_Kane
Leaf Kaigai Nikki
Registered: Mar 2009
From Canada
Posted March 05, 2015


Pidgeot
Sale Tracker
Registered: Dec 2009
From Germany
Posted March 05, 2015

64-bit XP was a completely different system due to being based on 2003. It only existed in the Professional edition (no Home edition). It came out very late in XP's reign (2005 compared to 2001 for regular XP and 2006 for Vista). Shell extensions wouldn't work because they were almost always 32-bit only, and driver support was often a problem because hardware manufacturers often didn't do *any* 64-bit development at this point.
On the consumer market, it only ever had relevance for a tiny, tiny group of enthusiasts. Those who really wanted/needed 64-bit would typically go for 2003 instead, which was available long before. As such, it seems incredibly strange for a game to support that configuration at all, without also supporting 32-bit XP - *especially* when said game apparently doesn't require enough RAM to need 64-bit in the first place.
Post edited March 05, 2015 by Pidgeot

DyNaer
New User
Registered: Nov 2011
From France
Posted March 05, 2015


It also seems wrong that XP is apparently supported, because that was 32-bit only - unless they mean the virtually unused 64-bit version of XP, but that seems like a stretch (and that one was really closer to Windows 2003 anyway).
Also, I'm pretty sure there isn't a 32-bit version of OS X 10.7 anyway, so the notice is rather pointless for that platform.
Post edited March 05, 2015 by DyNaer

skeletonbow
Galaxy 3 when?
Registered: Dec 2009
From Canada
Posted March 05, 2015


Edit: ugh, ninjad above... :)
Post edited March 05, 2015 by skeletonbow

JudasIscariot
Thievin' Bastard
GOG.com Team
Registered: Oct 2008
From Poland
Posted March 05, 2015

Ganni1987
'My Rewards' is DRM
Registered: Sep 2011
From Malta
Posted March 05, 2015
Thanks Judas :D
Downloading as I write this.
Downloading as I write this.