Posted December 24, 2015
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/9d9bcc65d3fa11811ed12a81ea99db6ca8f586fb1fcfabecdc64fc5b956fe7c7_avm.jpg)
But I tend to agree with Gydion though anyway, it appears GOG plans to take the Steam route with Galaxy, but the back end is just not ready yet. I base this on the fact Galaxy includes, like Steam, a way for devs to provide beta patches and such. No reason to do this if devs have to go through GOG for this.
I imagine eventually patches will be pushed live to Galaxy users via devs while standalone installers come later on via GOG. Those who want patches quickly will use Galaxy, while those who want stability and standalone installers will wait for GOG.
EDIT: To clarify an automated build for the standalone installers when patches are added to Galaxy would also be idea, but that would of course be up to GOG giving up even more control. They way there is no wait between a Galaxy patch and a standalone installer patch.
Post edited December 24, 2015 by user deleted