It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
moonshineshadow: I think I'll keep that a secret, don't want to offend anyone :P
avatar
DyNaer: you don't want to make some jealous :P
Yep :D
avatar
moonshineshadow: Huh good question :D
I think I'll keep that a secret, don't want to offend anyone :P
You could always vote for all. ;-)
avatar
moonshineshadow: Huh good question :D
I think I'll keep that a secret, don't want to offend anyone :P
avatar
HypersomniacLive: You could always vote for all. ;-)
Nah for all would be too much, but I could vote for all I actually know and just exempt people who appeared in my chat list I never even heard of... I wish I could delete such empty chats...
avatar
HypersomniacLive: You could always vote for all. ;-)
avatar
moonshineshadow: Nah for all would be too much, but I could vote for all I actually know and just exempt people who appeared in my chat list I never even heard of... I wish I could delete such empty chats...
+1
avatar
moonshineshadow: Nah for all would be too much, but I could vote for all I actually know and just exempt people who appeared in my chat list I never even heard of... I wish I could delete such empty chats...
I think that some just experiment around out of curiosity, and end up doing things they didn't really mean to do.

I'm going to leave my feedback about this abomination of private communication system in the next couple of days, and the point you make is definitely one that's on my list.

Did you vote for toxicTom's wishlist entry?
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I think that some just experiment around out of curiosity, and end up doing things they didn't really mean to do.

I'm going to leave my feedback about this abomination of private communication system in the next couple of days, and the point you make is definitely one that's on my list.

Did you vote for toxicTom's wishlist entry?
Voted. Especially the two line thing is really annoying...
avatar
JudasIscariot: 021 - ** - [05/08/2015] PM not working : users don't receive notification for new received PM, see : here [Support Ticket : Yes] , [Resolved: NO]


Resolved. You get TWO separate notifications under the Account menu item in the navbar. One notification is from your Friends and another is from the Chat section that you receive from people who are outside of your Friend list.

Please check your privacy settings in Orders & Settings if you are not getting notifications, perhaps it's just a setting issue (just a theory of mine).

[...]
[emphasis added]
This was about the notifications for the old PM system (look at the date). But regardless, your reply got me wondering about the part I highlighted.

I currently have a number next to "FRIENDS" in the drop-down menu of the account tab in the nav-bar which represents the pending friends invitations I received.

So, how does one distinguish between which notifications are from friends, and which correspond to pending friends invitations?
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I currently have a number next to "FRIENDS" in the drop-down menu of the account tab in the nav-bar which represents the pending friends invitations I received.

So, how does one distinguish between which notifications are from friends, and which correspond to pending friends invitations?
As far as I see this, the number next to friends shows the pending invites. And notifications aka chats are shown next to chat.
Hope the blues and GOG staff are seeing how change isn't always a good thing. Just remember, some one got paid to piss us all off. lol XD

As for a response like "well just have to work out the bugs". Nah, that doesn't fly. Stuff was amiable to user base before these changes. The grumbles will only subside as people have no choice in the matter...and yet some one got paid to do this.

A nice idea would be to get the customer base involved instead of asking a handful of people before making big changes to the one thing that makes the company money. The site.
avatar
moonshineshadow: As far as I see this, the number next to friends shows the pending invites. And notifications aka chats are shown next to chat.
That was my understanding as well, but read Judas comment:
One notification is from your Friends and another is from the Chat section that you receive from people who are outside of your Friend list.
This sounds like notifications for messages from friends appear next to Friends, and not next to Chat which is reserved only for exchanges with people that are not your friends (how ridiculous this whole terminology has become).
avatar
ElTerprise: Hmm..yeah..wouldn't be the first time a new release of Firefox breaks something. I looked into the changelog but i still have no idea...
Who remembers Firefox 4? :D
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I think that some just experiment around out of curiosity, and end up doing things they didn't really mean to do.

I'm going to leave my feedback about this abomination of private communication system in the next couple of days, and the point you make is definitely one that's on my list.

Did you vote for toxicTom's wishlist entry?
voted , too; but i'm afraid they trashed the code like they trashed in the bin many things :'(
Post edited May 14, 2015 by DyNaer
avatar
ElTerprise: Hmm..yeah..wouldn't be the first time a new release of Firefox breaks something. I looked into the changelog but i still have no idea...
avatar
Darvond: Who remembers Firefox 4? :D
You mean a time when Mozilla staff had intelligence to some degree? I do...barely >_>

They update and add more broken things and allow for so many holes to be exploited with every new addition. To put it mildly they are doing a terrible job. The people who make plugins complain all the time that they are kinda forced to update as well because if they don't, the plugin may end up breaking.

Company staff complain too. The average company PC times 100 cannot be updated every week, as most companies can't afford the IT people to maintain their systems. Kinda stupid all around technology these days.
avatar
Shmacky-McNuts: You mean a time when Mozilla staff had intelligence to some degree? I do...barely >_>

They update and add more broken things and allow for so many holes to be exploited with every new addition. To put it mildly they are doing a terrible job. The people who make plugins complain all the time that they are kinda forced to update as well because if they don't, the plugin may end up breaking.

Company staff complain too. The average company PC times 100 cannot be updated every week, as most companies can't afford the IT people to maintain their systems. Kinda stupid all around technology these days.
I meant when they broke their history cleaning. :D
avatar
Shmacky-McNuts: You mean a time when Mozilla staff had intelligence to some degree? I do...barely >_>

They update and add more broken things and allow for so many holes to be exploited with every new addition. To put it mildly they are doing a terrible job. The people who make plugins complain all the time that they are kinda forced to update as well because if they don't, the plugin may end up breaking.

Company staff complain too. The average company PC times 100 cannot be updated every week, as most companies can't afford the IT people to maintain their systems. Kinda stupid all around technology these days.
avatar
Darvond: I meant when they broke their history cleaning. :D
Well darn it! Ya had me all riled up for nuthin lol XD