Posted May 13, 2016
![MaxFulvus](https://images.gog.com/cac1b6be44e91db2e0d659336991af8d08bdc1b35b64a5fb2226bca1987f4224_forum_avatar.jpg)
MaxFulvus
Fulvus Forever !
Registered: Apr 2012
From France
![musteriuz](https://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_forum_avatar.jpg)
musteriuz
Serf City Rules!
Registered: Sep 2011
From South Africa
Posted May 13, 2016
I also use IE9 on a WinVista machine and I still have no account button except on the forum and when I go there it's blank. I can't add things to my wishlist, I can't purchase and I can't even see my games to download the ones I purchased over the last 2 weeks and haven't downloaded yet. I just updated Java to the latest available version and the problem didn't change a bit.
![Alaric.us](https://images.gog.com/337106fc6cc6ce02acba3e1a714824c9f12a4e5aa6a1c67d8128720b4de2dd8e_forum_avatar.jpg)
Alaric.us
Slava Ukraini
Registered: Feb 2010
From United States
Posted May 13, 2016
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_avm.jpg)
Why do you use IE9? The answer is important to me as a software engineer who works with web technologies. I struggle to understand why some users do this. Old browsers are not safe and not standards compliant. New browsers are free and better in every way — from speed, to security, to supporting new technologies that make your (and mine) life easier.
I would very much appreciate it if you could answer, and would be absolutely ecstatic if you could offer a few suggestions on how I, as a developer, could compel you to upgrade to a modern browser.
![Alaric.us](https://images.gog.com/337106fc6cc6ce02acba3e1a714824c9f12a4e5aa6a1c67d8128720b4de2dd8e_forum_avatar.jpg)
Alaric.us
Slava Ukraini
Registered: Feb 2010
From United States
Posted May 13, 2016
Also, I wanted to point out that Java Virtual Machine installation (the red icon in the bottom right corner) has nothing at all do do with the issue at hand. (I'm assuming that's what you updated, since it's not possible to update the version of JavaScript your browser uses.)
Java to JavaScript is what Ham is to Hamburg. Nothing at all in common other then a few letters in the beginning of the name.
Java to JavaScript is what Ham is to Hamburg. Nothing at all in common other then a few letters in the beginning of the name.
![Cavalary](https://images.gog.com/7522288e18cc1711f622ff9fe41346c6010a43974e047d76518ad471379ded94_forum_avatar.jpg)
Cavalary
RIP GoodOldGOG:DRMfree,one price,goodies,community
Registered: May 2011
From Romania
![Alaric.us](https://images.gog.com/337106fc6cc6ce02acba3e1a714824c9f12a4e5aa6a1c67d8128720b4de2dd8e_forum_avatar.jpg)
Alaric.us
Slava Ukraini
Registered: Feb 2010
From United States
![musteriuz](https://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_forum_avatar.jpg)
musteriuz
Serf City Rules!
Registered: Sep 2011
From South Africa
Posted May 13, 2016
Thanks to Cavalary for issuing a reply and what he said is right - I run Vista and no newer browser is available from MS. I tried Chrome and Firefox and hate both.
Thanks also for clarifying that Java and Javascript are 2 unrelated things. I don't think I have the second blocked - I received no requests for allowing cloudfront. I do not believe that JS is my problem anyway, although I have nearly no technical knowledge and may be completely wrong. The last time gog ran a Witcher promo for some release they also had a "banner" thing on the main page like now and it also broke the site for me. I had to wait until that event was over before I could use gog again. I think they're just not interested in keeping the site compatible for IE9 - the site has become more unusable bit by bit for me over the last 6 months or so, e.g. if i go to the "Games" tab from the main page, it is always blank and my chat function hasn't worked for a year, I think.
This at least helps me save money, but I am sad that I cannot download the games I already purchased.
Thanks also for clarifying that Java and Javascript are 2 unrelated things. I don't think I have the second blocked - I received no requests for allowing cloudfront. I do not believe that JS is my problem anyway, although I have nearly no technical knowledge and may be completely wrong. The last time gog ran a Witcher promo for some release they also had a "banner" thing on the main page like now and it also broke the site for me. I had to wait until that event was over before I could use gog again. I think they're just not interested in keeping the site compatible for IE9 - the site has become more unusable bit by bit for me over the last 6 months or so, e.g. if i go to the "Games" tab from the main page, it is always blank and my chat function hasn't worked for a year, I think.
This at least helps me save money, but I am sad that I cannot download the games I already purchased.
![Alaric.us](https://images.gog.com/337106fc6cc6ce02acba3e1a714824c9f12a4e5aa6a1c67d8128720b4de2dd8e_forum_avatar.jpg)
Alaric.us
Slava Ukraini
Registered: Feb 2010
From United States
Posted May 13, 2016
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_avm.jpg)
IE9 is 5 years old. That is a colossal amount of time when dealing with technology. Supporting it is a major pain for any development team, because a good number of standards that we are accustomed to are not implemented in it. Effectively we have to write two separate sites, one for IE and one for, well, everything else.
Additionally, old browsers (including IE9) are notoriously broken and insecure. Even when IE9 was still brand new, it had poor support for standards and poor security. You can pretty much square that for every year that passed since. What's worse, is that you may not only be hurting yourself, but also contributing to the overall rate of vulnerabilities on the Internet. Computers with old and insecure browsers are the primary targets for botnet operators and so on.
Many sites outright block browsers that are generations behind. GOG is kind enough not to do that, but you cannot possibly expect them to dedicate the time, effort, and funds to supporting a small group of holdouts. Moreover, the longer you wait, the less compatible your browser becomes. At some point there won't even be a workaround available to make it support modern web technologies and standards.
I urge you to consider upgrading, but if that is not possible, you may just have to live with having to experience a more and more inaccessible web. =(
Post edited May 13, 2016 by Alaric.us
![Cavalary](https://images.gog.com/7522288e18cc1711f622ff9fe41346c6010a43974e047d76518ad471379ded94_forum_avatar.jpg)
Cavalary
RIP GoodOldGOG:DRMfree,one price,goodies,community
Registered: May 2011
From Romania
Posted May 13, 2016
Devs also insist on making sites ever more complex and script heavy. In many cases there's little real reason why it couldn't be kept much simpler and less "active" than it is.
And the W3 validator reports 998 errors and 3 warnings for the GOG front page (direct input of page source, as otherwise there's an error 500) and 63 CSS errors. Speaking of standards.
And the W3 validator reports 998 errors and 3 warnings for the GOG front page (direct input of page source, as otherwise there's an error 500) and 63 CSS errors. Speaking of standards.
![Alaric.us](https://images.gog.com/337106fc6cc6ce02acba3e1a714824c9f12a4e5aa6a1c67d8128720b4de2dd8e_forum_avatar.jpg)
Alaric.us
Slava Ukraini
Registered: Feb 2010
From United States
Posted May 13, 2016
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/7522288e18cc1711f622ff9fe41346c6010a43974e047d76518ad471379ded94_avm.jpg)
And the W3 validator reports 998 errors and 3 warnings for the GOG front page (direct input of page source, as otherwise there's an error 500) and 63 CSS errors. Speaking of standards.
![ssokolow](https://images.gog.com/1d6f0aae3cd422d1f0c3960a59ab517d15f4c88dea5d9aa129e8028dd7c8ae00_forum_avatar.jpg)
ssokolow
Linux Geek
Registered: Feb 2011
From Canada
Posted May 13, 2016
Interesting bug just manifested in my Firefox with the library page.
Luckily, `lgogdownloader --download --game "^braid$"` is unaffected.
Luckily, `lgogdownloader --download --game "^braid$"` is unaffected.
![JudasIscariot](https://images.gog.com/53a791f0b2a54182019a71b20f956ac88d235400851016c013e84ebf9d2c55bd_forum_avatar.jpg)
JudasIscariot
Thievin' Bastard
GOG.com Team
Registered: Oct 2008
From Poland
![ssokolow](https://images.gog.com/1d6f0aae3cd422d1f0c3960a59ab517d15f4c88dea5d9aa129e8028dd7c8ae00_forum_avatar.jpg)
ssokolow
Linux Geek
Registered: Feb 2011
From Canada
Posted May 13, 2016
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/2cb98f22a170352a32e8c7d57fb4becfd0723eb419c2e856ad8ee0910c2a8499_avm.jpg)
Luckily, `lgogdownloader --download --game "^braid$"` is unaffected.
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/53a791f0b2a54182019a71b20f956ac88d235400851016c013e84ebf9d2c55bd_avm.jpg)
...though I suppose I could try my hand a whipping up a more robust userscript for converting the links to GOG Downloader ones.
(Even when Galaxy comes out for Linux, I'll stick with LGOGDownloader since only the games themselves are allowed to be closed-source on my system.)
![Johny.GOG](https://images.gog.com/99c8c43498e075fae7b4eb220ad40d785a41b4f9284ddc8c1607ed670dd28325_forum_avatar.jpg)
Johny.GOG
☕️
GOG.com Team
Registered: Dec 2014
From Poland
Posted May 13, 2016
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/bb9cbc3cfc7e592af75f04aebb9368107b84e2f38c5b0bf2c2c7cf0dc79d2097_avm.jpg)
A few weeks ago NYT, BBC, MSN, AOL were affected by malicious ads, injecting code via JS:
http://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/malvertising-campaign-in-us-leads-to-angler-exploit-kitbedep/
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/bb9cbc3cfc7e592af75f04aebb9368107b84e2f38c5b0bf2c2c7cf0dc79d2097_avm.jpg)
But in simple words - as with cloudfront example - if you'd block JS file that is trying to call analytics, you'd break the site.
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/bb9cbc3cfc7e592af75f04aebb9368107b84e2f38c5b0bf2c2c7cf0dc79d2097_avm.jpg)
> The resource at "https://d3tvtfb6518e3e.cloudfront.net/2/angular-opbeat.min.js" was blocked because tracking protection is enabled.
There is (imho) a good example how to implement GA without breaking functionality when for some reason (like DNT) a third-party service is not available:
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/01/google-analytics-privacy-and-event-tracking/
Please consider privacy and DNT as "not evil" :)
The above warning is a different thing, because this is angularjs module, which is required for angular to work. You could block calls to opbeat servers only and it would be OK.
I've enabled "Do not track" in Firefox and didn't had this warning concerning opbeat. In FF private mode GA was blocked, but site worked OK. I'll check more machines/FF versions/smth.
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/4e7b8e945a2563d7497333104eb6d12d0e914b62a6aa8a7ba171c6aac309241a_avm.jpg)
Stay safe!
Did someone try the NoScript settings I suggested, or have bad opinion about them? ;)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/3dc37e58aae4c7b17d2972d3f04aafd9da9c0e44bdbc200ec008b57cfd992e40_avm.jpg)
EDIT: Sorry, just a silly observation of mine -- having a beer, scanning through the GOG threads in general! :-)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/c122e53a8f42189d8f91ab9adcfa4a6f31dbf48d3ad07a891b6b2ed0e1ea8a1f_avm.jpg)
You could have an HTML/JavaScript button (e.g. labelled "I'm not a robot") that when clicked writes a file to the disk. The contents of that file could be anything.
"HTTP only" cookie means it can't be read by JavaScript. It's comforting - it prevents userscripts from stealing it. ;)
![avatar](http://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_avm.jpg)
Post edited May 13, 2016 by Johny.
![musteriuz](https://images.gog.com/587bf85b2c59291f6f61e47a7aebd4309f0961398f24da72a86bee14d7c7bd9c_forum_avatar.jpg)
musteriuz
Serf City Rules!
Registered: Sep 2011
From South Africa
Posted May 13, 2016
As I've said - I run Vista. There is no newer IE available for Vista. The only way I get a newer OS is if I get a newer PC and as I've been unemployed for over 2 years there is no expectation for that.
So now it seems I'll have to install either Chrome or Firefox, solely for the purpose of viewing gog. If I can still find a downloadable version of either of those two for Vista, would whichever version I get be able to view and access gog properly? And which one of the 2 is best?
If someone can kindly provide me with good guidance, I'll go for it, get my last few games downloaded and say goodbye to gog for a final time, including accepting that I'll never be able to purchase the nearly 50 games still on my wishlist.
So now it seems I'll have to install either Chrome or Firefox, solely for the purpose of viewing gog. If I can still find a downloadable version of either of those two for Vista, would whichever version I get be able to view and access gog properly? And which one of the 2 is best?
If someone can kindly provide me with good guidance, I'll go for it, get my last few games downloaded and say goodbye to gog for a final time, including accepting that I'll never be able to purchase the nearly 50 games still on my wishlist.