It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
avatar
Crackpot.756: Aye. That rhetorical question in particular was directed at this part of koima's post
Yeah, I know, I was just adding to it without wording it very well.

avatar
koima57: it is again an activism move of dtgreene, so the low voting he / she questionned is explained reasonably
What activism, just because someone is passionate or interested about something, doesn't make it activism.

And guess what, anyone who doesn't like it doesn't have to read her posts.

This is just nothing more than a group of spiteful little brats here simply downvoting the person, not their context.

Ironically, what she posts is usually far more intelligent and engaging than the brats who vote her down.
avatar
tinyE: You know if GOG would just get rid of the fucking rep we might actually be able to talk about Sims 4 in this, a Sims 4 thread!
Oh please, your hypocrisy fools nobody.

You're the head brat here, and along with your bum chum, are the main culprits.
Post edited June 06, 2016 by Kleetus
avatar
tinyE:
avatar
Kleetus: Oh please, your hypocrisy fools nobody.

You're the head brat here, and along with your bumchum, are the main downvoters.
Yes. And that would explain why I lose 12 points a day and most of my posts are low rated, because I'm doing all the derepping. :P


Wait, huh?
avatar
Crackpot.756: Aye. That rhetorical question in particular was directed at this part of koima's post
avatar
Kleetus: Yeah, I know, I was just adding to it without wording it very well.

avatar
koima57: it is again an activism move of dtgreene, so the low voting he / she questionned is explained reasonably
avatar
Kleetus: What activism, just because someone is passionate or interested about something, doesn't make it activism.

And guess what, anyone who doesn't like it doesn't have to read her posts.

This is just nothing more than a group of spiteful little brats here simply downvoting the person, not their context.

Ironically, what she posts is usually far more intelligent and engaging than the brats who vote her down.
avatar
tinyE: You know if GOG would just get rid of the fucking rep we might actually be able to talk about Sims 4 in this, a Sims 4 thread!
avatar
Kleetus: Oh please, your hypocrisy fools nobody.

You're the head brat here, and along with your bum chum, are the main culprits.
I did not pay attention to can voice an informed opinion on the quality of his; or her interventions; i can relate to supporting a cause dear to oneself, but activism starts when there is an obsession to bring them about forcibly and that seems to be the case by dtgreene's posting history, as far as i could browse the forums the last few weeks...

On the positive side, i read dtgreene regular posts about game mechanics with much interest; usually great input making him/her a valuable member of our GOG community aside from these little quirks.
Post edited June 06, 2016 by koima57
low rated
avatar
tinyE: Yes. And that would explain why I lose 12 points a day and most of my posts are low rated, because I'm doing all the derepping.
Just because you're getting some of your own back doesn't negate the fact that you and your gang are the main abusers of rep.

And only a spoiled brat would contact someone via chat, abuse them and then block them.

Or, ask them for something, then if they don't agree block them.

BTW, my puppy wants to bite you so bad.

EDIT: And it's not possible to "lose 12 points a day" nor are "most of your posts low rated", so don't talk shit and pretend to play the victim.
Post edited June 06, 2016 by Kleetus
avatar
tinyE: Yes. And that would explain why I lose 12 points a day and most of my posts are low rated, because I'm doing all the derepping.
avatar
Kleetus: Just because you're getting some of your own back doesn't negate the fact that you and your gang are the main abusers of rep.

And only a spoiled brat would contact someone via chat, abuse them and then block them.

Or, ask them for something, then if they don't agree block them.

BTW, my puppy wants to bite you so bad.

EDIT: And it's not possible to "lose 12 points a day" nor are "most of your posts low rated", so don't talk shit and pretend to play the victim.
Goodby Kleetus. I'm done with you. I am never going to post or reply to you again. Have a nice life.
low rated
avatar
tinyE: I'm done with you. I am never going to post or reply to you again.
Oh, poor wittle diddums is getting butthurt from reality.

And not replying to me won't stop me, I really don't care if people reply or not.

I can still post what I like and give you shit, and you'll just bend over and take it all while the other members can see and read it.

So don't think for a moment that ignoring me will have any effect on my determination to give you and your li'l bum chums your own shit back.
avatar
tinyE: You know if GOG would just get rid of the fucking rep we might actually be able to talk about Sims 4 in this, a Sims 4 thread!

OMG, just imagine that!

I DARE ANYONE IN HERE to come up with a valid reason for having that stupid number there.
Oh come now, Tiny. Don't get rid of the rep-system! It warms my heart to come to the GoG forum and see that my rep is higher than yours! It does wonders for my E-peen, you know! /s
I think it's silly the game previously had gender restrictions on items. Why make it impossible for a man to wear womens clothing? There's nothing stopping them to do so physically in the real world, just silly conventions and taboos.
avatar
DubConqueror: I think it's silly the game previously had gender restrictions on items. Why make it impossible for a man to wear womens clothing? There's nothing stopping them to do so physically in the real world, just silly conventions and taboos.
Maybe because you can't just put clothing on a 3d model and expect it to adhere to the body as it would in real life. Everything needs to be carefully adjusted and rigged so as to fit each body type available. That's a lot of work to do, and companies simply feel it isn't worth the hassle (which is why even AAA+ titles with zomg graphics tend to be populated only by tall, slim, muscular males and tall, slim, busty females).
avatar
almabrds: Money well spent* in theater.
Look at that score:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1058426-junior/

* Turn on your sarcasm detector, please.
avatar
Hunter65536: Haha I pity you dude, I saw it on TV (you can imagine how bad movies on other channels were if this was my only option) and was disappointed I couldn't sue the channel people for exposing me to that. :P
Ooops, seems I've expressed myself incorrectly.
You see, English in not my native language.
I was just making a sarcastic comment about how going to the theater to watch this was not a waste of time and money.
I did't mean I paid to watch Junior, I didn't. :P
low rated
avatar
almabrds: I did't mean I paid to watch Junior, I didn't.
I think you did, more than once too.
avatar
almabrds: I did't mean I paid to watch Junior, I didn't.
avatar
Kleetus: I think you did, more than once too.
And?
low rated
avatar
almabrds: And?
I draw no conclusion from it, just simply stating that you did, that's all.
avatar
almabrds: And?
avatar
Kleetus: I draw no conclusion from it, just simply stating that you did, that's all.
But how would you know what I meant?
And just thinking I did, "more than once", means nothing.
Unless you can prove that I paid to watch Junior, which you can't...
low rated
avatar
almabrds: Unless you can prove that I paid to watch Junior, which you can't...
I think you did, more than once, why can't you just admit it?