toxicTom: And hard to overlook except you only used those "install" and "play" buttons.
That's how I roll, baby.
Seriously, though, that that's all I need in 99% of all cases. That is exactly why Galaxy is good for users like me.
Also, this further makes the entire outrage absurd. And further confirms that they should advertise this functionality more openly and make it even more prominent in the Galaxy client.
However, it also means that what I stated earlier isn't necessarily correct. If they do offer installer downloads through the client they might very well be planning to make the client mandatory - can't say that it would be a very bad thing in my book, however. I don't think that people would have ever been frustrated with GOG if downloading had been always only possible via a client like the old downloader, just losing the option to download directly via browser would hurt because we're used to it and it would be an uncanny change. Well, okay, the big problem I
can think of is that it would become impossible to download games on platforms that Galaxy is not compatible with but that's just the more reason why I don't quite think that GOG will make Galaxy mandatory, certainly not before making sure that Galaxy runs on all platforms that are also supported by the library itself.
ZaineH: Galaxy downloads offline installers just fine...
Yeah, actually wasn't aware of that. Another reason why the outrage is really unnecessary.