Posted October 17, 2016
Feeling a bit better (so long it lasts).
My dear fellow colleagues, may I remind you that we have 5 Leads and only 4 days (3 clues). Zeogold tried to warn us about the urgency of this case in post 4.
Mr. Olf, what would phone records proof? That a call was placed? Does it mean the person was next to the phone? Don't you remember the old case were a quite brilliant mind used telegrams as an alibi? Till it was found out, he used a double too send those? Oh yes, he got away with it, for a long time.
Same might go for hunting down those codes. Would they really proof anything? Anyone could enter those codes, or?
My dear Mr. Bler,
some brilliant thinking. but for my feeling you neglected the opportunity part too much. Motive, motive, does it always have to be the motive? Was Lynette having an affair with LeRoy, would it be a motive? Yes for sure my dear colleague. Would it give the killer the opportunity though?
Was LeRoy of Mike being pushed by the GOGfather? We don't know for sure, but why shall then the GOGfather put us, the best minds, onto this job and get in danger to be found guilty? Would it be really wroth the risk?
So I think that in this case the motive is only a secondary choice for us to consider. If we were able to exclude by deduction any possible person we might get a better idea for the motive alongside, or?
And using a bit deduction just beforehand as well, can we establish a verifiable timeline? both shootings happened around the same time as both eye-witnesses reported, a difference of minutes will be really hard to establish.
Even if the alarm had been turned on and off, this was around the same time Markus was getting shoot. So it would not proof or disprove anything, am I deducting correctly? So the timeline for now seems to be rather irrelevant. Even the autopsy could not really help us so much for the timeline either, it would not even proof if she opened the door or somebody else. According to our knowledge the same weapon has been used in both shootings, which emphasizes the means and opportunity above motive.
The tape might already reveal who the murder is. Lets assume Mike would have been the murder, we would see a person coming back to scene dropping of the weapon, as Lynette was still alive when M&M were leaving the house,. unfortunate our colleague Zeogold never bothered taking notes were the camera was found and if it was still recording. Zeogold my friend, have you not paid attention while visiting the course in Germany? Were you to busy with those Leberkäs-Semmeln? And can you please check your notes if you have some information about this or why you failed to take note of this *hammering on the table and shouting: Öffnen*
But back to the tape and more deduction, if we do not see a person coming back on the video we could for the moment exclude Mike from the list, as he would have needed to come back to the scene of the first shooting, right my dear colleagues?
The only person which would have not needed to come back to the crime scene in the forest would have been the killer of Lynette, did I deduct correctly so for the moment?
Yes the search might show up another suspect, maybe, which again using pure deduction again seems to be unlikely as we would be back to the point, why shall the GOGfather take this extreme risk by getting us involved?
Jawohl meine Herren, oh excuse me my Lady *bowing towards Officer Sci* I think that sums it up quite nicely.
But feel free to inject your thinking as well, Zeogold really needs our help here, otherwise he will have to work for Zeagold, and I don't think we want this to happen, or?
My dear fellow colleagues, may I remind you that we have 5 Leads and only 4 days (3 clues). Zeogold tried to warn us about the urgency of this case in post 4.
Mr. Olf, what would phone records proof? That a call was placed? Does it mean the person was next to the phone? Don't you remember the old case were a quite brilliant mind used telegrams as an alibi? Till it was found out, he used a double too send those? Oh yes, he got away with it, for a long time.
Same might go for hunting down those codes. Would they really proof anything? Anyone could enter those codes, or?
My dear Mr. Bler,
some brilliant thinking. but for my feeling you neglected the opportunity part too much. Motive, motive, does it always have to be the motive? Was Lynette having an affair with LeRoy, would it be a motive? Yes for sure my dear colleague. Would it give the killer the opportunity though?
Was LeRoy of Mike being pushed by the GOGfather? We don't know for sure, but why shall then the GOGfather put us, the best minds, onto this job and get in danger to be found guilty? Would it be really wroth the risk?
So I think that in this case the motive is only a secondary choice for us to consider. If we were able to exclude by deduction any possible person we might get a better idea for the motive alongside, or?
And using a bit deduction just beforehand as well, can we establish a verifiable timeline? both shootings happened around the same time as both eye-witnesses reported, a difference of minutes will be really hard to establish.
Even if the alarm had been turned on and off, this was around the same time Markus was getting shoot. So it would not proof or disprove anything, am I deducting correctly? So the timeline for now seems to be rather irrelevant. Even the autopsy could not really help us so much for the timeline either, it would not even proof if she opened the door or somebody else. According to our knowledge the same weapon has been used in both shootings, which emphasizes the means and opportunity above motive.
The tape might already reveal who the murder is. Lets assume Mike would have been the murder, we would see a person coming back to scene dropping of the weapon, as Lynette was still alive when M&M were leaving the house,. unfortunate our colleague Zeogold never bothered taking notes were the camera was found and if it was still recording. Zeogold my friend, have you not paid attention while visiting the course in Germany? Were you to busy with those Leberkäs-Semmeln? And can you please check your notes if you have some information about this or why you failed to take note of this *hammering on the table and shouting: Öffnen*
But back to the tape and more deduction, if we do not see a person coming back on the video we could for the moment exclude Mike from the list, as he would have needed to come back to the scene of the first shooting, right my dear colleagues?
The only person which would have not needed to come back to the crime scene in the forest would have been the killer of Lynette, did I deduct correctly so for the moment?
Yes the search might show up another suspect, maybe, which again using pure deduction again seems to be unlikely as we would be back to the point, why shall the GOGfather take this extreme risk by getting us involved?
Jawohl meine Herren, oh excuse me my Lady *bowing towards Officer Sci* I think that sums it up quite nicely.
But feel free to inject your thinking as well, Zeogold really needs our help here, otherwise he will have to work for Zeagold, and I don't think we want this to happen, or?