It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
zeogold: Well, I mean, who ELSE is gonna talk to the dead woman? She ain't an elf, so it sure as heck ain't gonna be you.
a necromancer , but we don't have this ....right ?
avatar
REDVWIN: I would like to have a look at the "mop" used by Archie, so please retrieve it and bring it to the lab for a strand by strand analysis.

REDVWIN
I'm sorry, do you see the size of this court? The only decorations we could afford for the place was a cheese-covered shag rug stolen from the Hermit Cave, soaked in rum, and lit on fire by sparks from the samurai's malfunctioning computer game! Do we LOOK like we can afford a lab analysis?!
Materializing out of thin air, a wraith like presence makes itself felt, with only a jovial grin visible though the enshrouding shadow.

Suspicion naturally falls on the first people on the scene, Dean Gruber and Archie Manford. To rule out either one of these fellows (well Dean more so than Archie) and infact Krypsyn himself, we need, first and foremost, the evidence provided by the Prosecution Witness, Doorman. Having seen who came in and out of the building (unless ofcourse there is some hidden/external means of entry other than through the front door), we should start with him and thus establish some kind of a timeline.
Post edited February 25, 2016 by ShadowPatriarch
avatar
zeogold: Well, I mean, who ELSE is gonna talk to the dead woman? She ain't an elf, so it sure as heck ain't gonna be you.
avatar
DyNaer: a necromancer , but we don't have this ....right ?
Well, I could go to some of those threads back from January, but I'm not sure that many people would like that.
avatar
DyNaer: vote for the Prosecution Witness, Doorman: why he didn't answered at the intercom., looks suspicious to me.
By the by, I understand this was a vote, but just to make things visually easier for me, please bold your votes. I've been known to miss votes before.
Post edited February 25, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
zeogold: By the by, I understand this was a vote, but just to make things visually easier for me, please bold your votes. I've been known to miss votes before.
yes your highness :P
avatar
DyNaer: yes your puzzliness :P
Fixed it.
Post edited February 25, 2016 by zeogold
Hm, when will the witnesses make their statements?
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Hm, when will the witnesses make their statements?
I'm guessing when everyone has voted on who they would like to hear.
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Hm, when will the witnesses make their statements?
The prosecution and the defense are currently browbeating the defendant with equal amounts of voracity at the defendant's table. They'll show up soon enough, I'm sure. They actually have some things to say outside of the evidence that'll be voted in.
Post edited February 25, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Hm, when will the witnesses make their statements?
avatar
zeogold: The prosecution and the defense are currently browbeating the defendant with equal amounts of voracity at the defendant's table. They'll show up soon enough, I'm sure. They actually have some things to say outside of the evidence that'll be voted in.
Hm, where is Phoenex Wright when you need him?
People choosing either "Officer on Scene, Bedroom/Bathroom" as the evidence, do reconsider opting for selecting the "Prosecution Witness, Doorman" evidence. If you opt to see this later evidence first we can establish who came and left the building and at what time, and also confirm the doorman's whereabouts at the time of the murder. Once we establish this, we can move on to gather evidence at the Bedroom/bathroom, thus providing us with a clearer view of the situation.
avatar
zeogold: The prosecution and the defense are currently browbeating the defendant with equal amounts of voracity at the defendant's table. They'll show up soon enough, I'm sure. They actually have some things to say outside of the evidence that'll be voted in.
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Hm, where is Phoenex Wright when you need him?
I extended the offer to him, but he objected
avatar
ShadowPatriarch: People choosing either "Officer on Scene, Bedroom/Bathroom" as the evidence, do reconsider opting for selecting the "Prosecution Witness, Doorman" evidence. If you opt to see this later evidence first we can establish who came and left the building and at what time, and also confirm the doorman's whereabouts at the time of the murder. Once we establish this, we can move on to gather evidence at the Bedroom/bathroom, thus providing us with a clearer view of the situation.
except if the doorman lies -.-
avatar
ShadowPatriarch: People choosing either "Officer on Scene, Bedroom/Bathroom" as the evidence, do reconsider opting for selecting the "Prosecution Witness, Doorman" evidence. If you opt to see this later evidence first we can establish who came and left the building and at what time, and also confirm the doorman's whereabouts at the time of the murder. Once we establish this, we can move on to gather evidence at the Bedroom/bathroom, thus providing us with a clearer view of the situation.
avatar
DyNaer: except if the doorman lies -.-
What? It's not like he's part of the mafia or something.
.....
No, I'm not giving spoilers. Quit looking at me like that.
avatar
DyNaer: except if the doorman lies -.-
avatar
zeogold: What? It's not like he's part of the mafia or something.
.....
No, I'm not giving spoilers. Quit looking at me like that.
Perhaps the JUDGE is part of the mafia!
Post edited February 25, 2016 by omega64