It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
Tauto sneaks back in disguised as Perry Mason and draws a bit of attention from the court room as the Judge calls for QUIET!!!! When things quieten down Tauto lobs a stink bomb at the jury and hits the railing which then ricochet's the stink bomb towards the judge.
avatar
Tauto: Tauto sneaks back in disguised as Perry Mason and draws a bit of attention from the court room as the Judge calls for QUIET!!!! When things quieten down Tauto lobs a stink bomb at the jury and hits the railing which then ricochet's the stink bomb towards the judge.
ok dude, i got it perfectly clear that you despise and cant stand the zeogold guy at all for whatever reason of yours. Granted.

now if you could keep your vendetta and petty quarrels for other parts of the forum, even if i understand that the mere thought of zeogold existence is unbearable to you and your gang...

i would like you to realise that other people registered this thread just to have fun, and those people have NO BUSINESS with you or whatever friends of yours, nor those people ever did anything against you, AFAIK.

but i guess you are the kind of person who like to shit over anyone's mouth just because you think anyone else is worthless and you are entitled the right to stomp them ? great mentality, dude... Do you apply same policy IRL ? i mean, without getting punched or kicked now and then ?

do me a favor: pm the people you dont like, troll them on regular threads and dont come sabotage one here, or annoy strangers in the process, thanks a lot
Hmm, I’m still inclined to learn more about what happened in the bathroom. I’m not fooled by all this "open the sink taps so the body is found quickly", there must be another explanation.
Forensics would most probably have been able to date the moment of death anyway, so the defendant would still have an alibi even if the corpse had been found a day later.

I think I’ll vote tonight, meanwhile I’m open to discussion with the other jurors.

While I understand the interest in the victim’s co-worker, I fail to understand the point of scrutinizing the bedroom. I don’t think the victim has been killed in there. The bathroom on the other hand is a perfect place to kill someone while leaving as little tracks as possible, then dragging the corpse to the bedroom could just have been a trick to mislead us.
Could the jurors who voted to examine the bedroom explain to me what they expect to find in there?
avatar
vv221: Could the jurors who voted to examine the bedroom explain to me what they expect to find in there?
Evidence, I think. I mean, supposedly the body's in there.
avatar
Habanerose: Do you happen to also be a sibling of the infamous zeogald, zeogild, zeoguld and (despite his parents denying him) zeogoats :P
I wonder how my sister, zeogoldilocks, is doing. I should call her sometime.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
vv221: Could the jurors who voted to examine the bedroom explain to me what they expect to find in there?
I'm not really interested in the bedroom itself. The body is in there though and we should really have a closer look at that.
avatar
vv221: Could the jurors who voted to examine the bedroom explain to me what they expect to find in there?
breasts
avatar
vv221: Could the jurors who voted to examine the bedroom explain to me what they expect to find in there?
avatar
ZFR: breasts
Anything you say can and will be held against you!
.......wait a second......
avatar
Habanerose: Also, could someone tell Mr. Amrit that trying to eat members of the jury is bad :P
You could always seek protection from Maxvorstadt. I hear he'd like to keep you safe and warm in his soup cauldron.
avatar
Habanerose: Also, could someone tell Mr. Amrit that trying to eat members of the jury is bad :P
avatar
zeogold: You could always seek protection from Maxvorstadt. I hear he'd like to keep you safe and warm in his soup cauldron.
Yep, that`s why they call it the "Refugee Cauldron". Want some refugee soup?
avatar
zeogold: You could always seek protection from Maxvorstadt. I hear he'd like to keep you safe and warm in his soup cauldron.
avatar
Maxvorstadt: Yep, that`s why they call it the "Refugee Cauldron". Want some refugee soup?
Why do I get the sudden feeling the soup is made in part of actual refugees... :P
avatar
ashwald: Not if sneaking in to do the deed was a ploy to direct suspicion elsewhere.
avatar
bler144: Don't see how that explains it, unless you're proposing that her apartment key is able to unlock the back door to the building. If all it opens is her apartment, again, it's irrelevant since the victim wouldn't be around to say whether she had let the killer in, or if they'd used a key.

Here the accused had a key, yes, but if the prosecution's narrative holds, he wouldn't have needed it regardless because of the victim's prior stated intent to open the door for killer. So there's no misdirect.

Anyway, the doorman's testimony is exactly as predicted. The accused was not observed entering the building, and Archie's claim to have called the front desk is at least generally not supported.
Guess I didn't word it properly. Whether the killer is Archie or Krypsyn, making it look like someone sneaked in to do the deed by unlocking the back entrance from the inside (or taking advantage if it is habitually left unlocked), would direct suspicion elsewhere.

Random thoughts:
Assuming the victim really was afraid of Krypsyn but needed to talk to him regardless, it is actually smart to meet him during his break because then he would be forced to leave before overstaying his welcome. At the same time it is beyond stupid to invite him to her house to talk instead of doing so in a crowded public place where she'd be safe. Did she have reasons not to be seen with him in public?

Prosecution Witness, Darleen's Coworker Let's hear some dirt. >:D
Post edited February 28, 2016 by ashwald
avatar
bler144: the final verdict is majority rule
Actually, I've had this discussion with the Puzzlemaster before. In federal cases, such as murder, the verdict must be unanimous, at least in U.S. law. As the Puzzlemaster informed me though, we're currently in Puzzlemasteristan.

My vote still stands from the day before:

Officer on scene, Bedroom.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by sunshinecorp
avatar
sunshinecorp: Actually, I've had this discussion with the Puzzlemaster before. In federal cases, such as murder, the verdict must be unanimous, at least in U.S. law. As the Puzzlemaster informed me though, we're currently in Puzzlemasteristan.
And in normal murder trials, the defendant isn't toting a freakin' SHOTGUN in the middle of the courtroom.
avatar
sunshinecorp: Actually, I've had this discussion with the Puzzlemaster before. In federal cases, such as murder, the verdict must be unanimous, at least in U.S. law. As the Puzzlemaster informed me though, we're currently in Puzzlemasteristan.
avatar
zeogold: And in normal murder trials, the defendant isn't toting a freakin' SHOTGUN in the middle of the courtroom.
Shotguns are a fashion accessory. 'tis my right to accessorize fashionably.
avatar
zeogold: And in normal murder trials, the defendant isn't toting a freakin' SHOTGUN in the middle of the courtroom.
avatar
sunshinecorp: Shotguns are a fashion accessory. 'tis my right to accessorize fashionably.
Ok, but that still doesn't explain the naked, hula-dancing potato.
Or the drunk gypsy.
Or the werewolves.
Post edited February 28, 2016 by zeogold