It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
bler144: If I'm right I'm in for Austro.

For reasons that will eventually become clear.

To me.
....and if you're wrong....?
avatar
zeogold: ....and if you're wrong....?
Then a guilty man walks free, and I'll have to cry myself to sleep with the guilt?
avatar
zeogold: ....and if you're wrong....?
avatar
bler144: Then a guilty man walks free, and I'll have to cry myself to sleep with the guilt?
I was referring to:
avatar
bler144: If I'm right I'm in for Austro.
So...if you're wrong, you're in for me? Yourself? The judge?
I'll stick with Laundry Analysis, Defense Witness.

Can I declare bler to be guilty? Of whatever,.
avatar
ZFR: Can I declare bler to be guilty? Of whatever,.
No, but you're free to shoot him if you can wrest the gun out of the defendant's hands.
avatar
ZFR: Can I declare bler to be guilty? Of whatever,.
avatar
zeogold: No, but you're free to shoot him if you can wrest the gun out of the defendant's hands.
And that ain't likely young-un, there might be bear around here.
Heh, heh, might be one of em'll eat that bler fella. :-)
Got any of them there Snickers bars left?


Think I'll just play me a game while you fellars jaw about this.
Post edited January 05, 2016 by EndreWhiteMane
avatar
EndreWhiteMane: Snickers?
*flings chocolate*

:P
avatar
EndreWhiteMane: Snickers?
avatar
ashwald: *flings chocolate*

:P
Thanks, nice Santa get up.
avatar
zeogold: ....and if you're wrong....?
avatar
bler144: Then a guilty man walks free, and I'll have to cry myself to sleep with the guilt?
Better a single guilty man is released then a hundred innocent men incarcerated.
The guilty man may offend later and we will get him then. A-ha! *points wildly in all directions*

-- Sorry I am still digesting todays information against what I already have, and people comments. I will be with you guys shortly. :)
Alright, I've found a computer.


The Evidence:

Alright, there are only a few ways for there to be blood residue on the floor. Either it was dripping from his clothing, or it was on his shoes, or maybe he happened to be crawling. I'll discount the third option for now. If it was dripping, then this is obviously the only places he went. If it was on his shoes, then we can't discount many other possibilities, if he simply removed his shoes.

Now, positioning. Unfortunately, our dear Puzzlemaster seems disinclined to tell us where Whitemane was interrogated. Or interviewed, or whatever.

If Whitemane was interviewed in the kitchen, then the blood traces are completely explainable. If not, then we've got some weird stuff going down, because there should be blood traces wherever he was interrogated.


For now, I'm going to again vote Evidence from the Car because I still feel that's more useful than the field. Although if our evidence this time was any indication, it may not be all that helpful.


Questions for the Puzzlemaster:

Where was Whitemane interrogated and arrested?

Did the blood stains resemble drops, or shoe prints?
avatar
agentcarr16: Questions for the Puzzlemaster:

Where was Whitemane interrogated and arrested?

Did the blood stains resemble drops, or shoe prints?
Edit: Alright, alright, I suppose I can answer the first one because it was already mentioned/suggested in the case.
Post edited January 05, 2016 by zeogold
avatar
agentcarr16: Questions for the Puzzlemaster:

Where was Whitemane interrogated and arrested?

Did the blood stains resemble drops, or shoe prints?
avatar
zeogold: Edit: Alright, alright, I suppose I can answer the first one because it was already mentioned/suggested in the case.
Was it? Oops, guess Ican go look for it then.
avatar
zeogold: Edit: Alright, alright, I suppose I can answer the first one because it was already mentioned/suggested in the case.
avatar
agentcarr16: Was it? Oops, guess Ican go look for it then.
I was in the midst of editing, but since you replied, I'll just say it here:
avatar
zeogold: We were just heading back when Moe spotted this guy in a field. It was a full moon and we could see he was dragging something through the weeds. We pulled over to see if he needed help. And then we saw the body. He was dragging this dead, bloody body. The guy was little and didn’t have a gun. So Jim held him while I phoned the cops.
Considering that they found Endre in the field and one of the workmen held him as soon as they saw the body, It's reasonable to assume he stayed in the field until the cops arrested him.
avatar
agentcarr16: Was it? Oops, guess Ican go look for it then.
avatar
zeogold: I was in the midst of editing, but since you replied, I'll just say it here:
avatar
zeogold: We were just heading back when Moe spotted this guy in a field. It was a full moon and we could see he was dragging something through the weeds. We pulled over to see if he needed help. And then we saw the body. He was dragging this dead, bloody body. The guy was little and didn’t have a gun. So Jim held him while I phoned the cops.
avatar
zeogold: Considering that they found Endre in the field and one of the workmen held him as soon as they saw the body, It's reasonable to assume he stayed in the field until the cops arrested him.
You're still evading the interrogation part. :P
Post edited January 05, 2016 by ashwald
avatar
zeogold: I was in the midst of editing, but since you replied, I'll just say it here:

Considering that they found Endre in the field and one of the workmen held him as soon as they saw the body, It's reasonable to assume he stayed in the field until the cops arrested him.
avatar
ashwald: You're still evading the interrogation part. :P
Where did I ever post about any interrogation of him?