But I thought the Swiss were neutral. Guess that's what they wanted us to think. Those tricky bastards.

I just noticed my disdain at hipsters, The Big Bang Theory, FemThor, and Coagula led to downvotes. Now I just wonder which of all those things was which triggered people. At least I would like to see one of the down voters explain what they disagree with. Seriously, I would like to know where is the mistake in my statements.

All of them, BBT is whay introduced all these bullies to "nurd culture", FemThor, well, self-explanatory, the last one, well, i don't know, period blood metaphor or something? one never knows.

No where. You're not on with their ideological agenda, thus a heretic. The difference between hipsters/social justice/and other crap with the absolute worst of religious nuts is well...minimal.

Coagula was a transgender DC comics character with got it's powers as a sort of STD from another metahuman. She makes solids liquid and liquids solid. Written by a total SJW and seen by many as one of the worst comic book heroes.

By that measuring stick, my 8th grade chemistry teacher should have had her own comic book.. Seriously, this is what passes for super powers now? What's next, Captain Stair Climber or Agent He-Who-Can-Pay-His-Own-rent? I can eat food like no one's business. Just call me CALORI-TRON DESTROYER MK 2! Bring me my magic spoon and enchanted fork!

http://operationrainfall.com/2016/06/02/french-government-sexist/

French goverment considers adding "sexist" game label.

It never ends this shit.

So its either the right wing and their morality religious nationalist shit or the this? Which one is progress then?

As a genuine idea, I feel a coalition option should be there as a voting option. Some sort of coalition must be better than the other two choices. Forced moderation if you will.

Congratulations; now you are asking the important questions!
Prior to asking "which side I should choose", people should always ponder "Why am I supposed to choose from just these options? How important is make the right choice? Should I choose right now? Should I choose at all?" and so on.
Granted, the questions are hard, the answers are rarely easy and fully satisfying, but even being aware that these questions exist is valuable knowledge.

If you are talking about political parties, then no; it could never work. Political landscape dominated by just two parties is result of election system based by majority, anything powerful enough to force them to cooperate will became the true political power in the place of the parties in question, and the whole problem arise again on the next level. And changing political model to proportional wouldn't automatically improve things either.
But in practical, everyday politics, you can do it just by asking the aforementioned questions in every particular controversy. Be your own party, be prepared to make coalitions on case-by-case basis, but never sworn undying loyalty to any "side". This way, you can potentially ally with all other "moderates", because - really important ! - all moderate opponents in any particular case will remain potential coalition members in another one, if you treat them as such.

Since they mention dishonered 2 instead of mirror's edge 2 which is directly endorsed by the patron saint of oppressed females, I think it's more of a nationalistic progressive boasting thing (The irony!), because all of those games are made by french studios.

That sucks, have you tried to contact them to see if they got it from someone pretending to give them original screenshots or if they just straight up took it from your site?

A video about the fatal flaw of diversity and overall politics in games.

Now, look. I have seen a couple of very awesome games with a political message. Like for example the 90% of all JRPGs, even The Witcher has a bit of political message. But the differences are key factors, First of all they are not that polarizing, second the political undertones are not central to the whole game story and gameplay, finally the games are fun.

https://youtu.be/MA9N8NEqS9E

I dont think The Big Bang Theory has nothing to be with the "dawn" of SJWs. I think a comfortable society that has nothing relevant to do with their lives, (and also don´t understand and realize have nothing to do with a boring life is in fact a gift only granted to developed societies) and urge to do something "important" with their iPads, Smartphones and computers without moving their asses from their sofas has more to be with this fact, and movement, than anything else...

But I am glad to see I am not the only one that consider that The Big Bang Theory is bad, I never liked it at all, but is my humble opinion, never sure why it never entertained me, I found it boring beyond see it like when I am having lunch or ultra-boring without any other better option to waste my time. Never understood why is so popular, maybe is because the actors are funny in their performances, but for me is like seeing a weekly night talking show, is always the same thing.

I don't relate it directly to SJWs. SJWs exist since the 80's if not earlier. But that show kind of put the "geek culture" in the public scope as something socially acceptable. "Geeks" were no longer disgusting basement dwellers and kids with ink stains in their shirt pockets and broken glasses with jury rigged tape fixes, now they were trendy and used the expletive "bazinga".
And we all know that SJWs latch to the trendiest subculture available to infect it.

let's not forget Extrano and the rest of the New Guardians from the 1980s!