It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
What ''not taking away your games'' means in 2015 : http://postimg.org/image/benlglq1x/
avatar
Shadowstalker16: What ''not taking away your games'' means in 2015 : http://postimg.org/image/benlglq1x/
This realy makes me very angry. I mean, we are being denied games and content because of people who don't even really care about the games.
what could frustrated gamers do to pass time when they are not kept in their dark grotto with their games to keep the world safe from them ?

if those folks ruin the whole game market while they don't even take part in it, we will be left with so much spare time and pissed off feelings that what ? they would expect us to join them and drink out their poisonned nonsense ?
avatar
Djaron: what could frustrated gamers do to pass time when they are not kept in their dark grotto with their games to keep the world safe from them ?

if those folks ruin the whole game market while they don't even take part in it, we will be left with so much spare time and pissed off feelings that what ? they would expect us to join them and drink out their poisonned nonsense ?
Well, they do like to riun and coopt other's hobbies. I don't know why or for what purpose. They just do.
avatar
Djaron: what could frustrated gamers do to pass time when they are not kept in their dark grotto with their games to keep the world safe from them ?

if those folks ruin the whole game market while they don't even take part in it, we will be left with so much spare time and pissed off feelings that what ? they would expect us to join them and drink out their poisonned nonsense ?
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Well, they do like to riun and coopt other's hobbies. I don't know why or for what purpose. They just do.
Because
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Well, they do like to riun and coopt other's hobbies. I don't know why or for what purpose. They just do.
avatar
Gnostic: <a href="http://www.gog.com/forum/general/the_gamergate_news_thread/post6322" class="link_arrow"></a></div> In a world where [url=https://reason.com/blog/2015/06/11/amherst-student-was-expelled-for-rape-bu]this can happen I can understand how more men don't want the risk involved
So basically SJWs have ruined interpersonal interaction so much no one wants to be in contact with others and powerful bonds of love and friendship are gone. They literally made sure everyone felt always lonely and without anything to do. They want to ruin the world.
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: In a world where this can happen I can understand how more men don't want the risk involved
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So basically SJWs have ruined interpersonal interaction so much no one wants to be in contact with others and powerful bonds of love and friendship are gone. They literally made sure everyone felt always lonely and without anything to do. They want to ruin the world.
Just like everything else
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: In a world where this can happen I can understand how more men don't want the risk involved
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So basically SJWs have ruined interpersonal interaction so much no one wants to be in contact with others and powerful bonds of love and friendship are gone. They literally made sure everyone felt always lonely and without anything to do. They want to ruin the world.
That's what the Third Wave Feminist does. It is a by product of preserving their own interest.

If you look at the numbers
http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/31/study-busts-gender-pay-gap-myths-as-young-women-earn-more-than-men/

There will be very little need for Feminist. So what to do when donation stops, reputation as a Feminist fades into obscurity. Whole money business chain based on divorce court, women help program, so called social workers, women shelter crumbles?

To stay relevant they have to invent imaginary oppression and use anything to justify their existence. Fortunately or unfortunately most of their audience lacks critical thinking, or sees more power to themselves is good that they ignore the facts and being shortsighted about the consequence.

When they see things start to crumble will they change their mind or go in deeper denial.
For that matter, I think MGTOW is more effective than MRA. MRA can preach equality and fairness all they want, but very little people would actually go against their self interest for doing what's right.

Most people will act on their self interest and MGTOW is making women realize it is their self interest to reject Feminist. When men leaves the gambling table (Marriage) in droves and women suddenly realize they have to be responsible for themselves, work for long hours and hardly have time for their children, will they prefer the old way.

One can hardly convince another to change with concept of fairness, logic, statistic, one have much more success appealing to another self interest.
Post edited December 17, 2015 by Gnostic
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: In a world where this can happen I can understand how more men don't want the risk involved
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: So basically SJWs have ruined interpersonal interaction so much no one wants to be in contact with others and powerful bonds of love and friendship are gone. They literally made sure everyone felt always lonely and without anything to do. They want to ruin the world.
Yes. I have a friend that I've known for over 20 years who is a special little SJW snowflake that gets offended at just about everything. We're at the point now of basically only dealing with each other due to having a connection at work. She and I have butted heads and argued so many times over political correctness and other issues that unless something involves work, we pretty much don't talk any more.

Hey, fuck 'em all. They want to create a cold, detached world where no one will pursue personal relationships for fear of being slandered or sued, then let them stew in the wasteland that they've created. There's a certain mutual understanding that must take place in the nature of social contracts. When those trusts and understandings are broken, we've reached a point of contradicting the point of having social contracts. At that point everyone basically takes their own ball and goes home.

The entire human race needs 5 minutes in the timeout corner.
I'm glad anti-political correctness/anti-sjw online won recently in the US 2nd court of appeals setting precedent.

Court's PDF Complete Casefile: http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/cannibalcop.pdf

dubbed "cannibal cop" cause he posted crazy fantasy stuff, which media went nuts and never really explained the context in which he had posted. On a "Vore" & "Dolcett" type fetish, which has a huge amount of artwork, reddit, chans, and paid sites with setup scenes.

Yea it's nuts, but it's not him that's the point it's what the court ruled on that gives freedom of speech online, and anti-pc/anti-sjw online backup and sets a precedent as all final appeal trials set precedent's for future cases.

The ruling after all the retrials and appeals from 2012 Finally ended few days ago.

Quote:

The United States 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in favor of former NYPD officer Gilberto Valle — the so-called "cannibal cop." In 2012, Valle was fired and arrested for going online and talking about his fantasies, which included kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, and cannibalism. He was later convicted in a jury trial, even though no actual crime was committed.

A district court judge overturned the conviction, but the government appealed, hoping to make it stick. The Appeals Court has now affirmed Valle's acquittal.

In the ruling (PDF), the court notes, "We are loathe to give the government the power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions. That includes the power to criminalize an individual's expression of sexual fantasies, no matter how perverse or disturbing. Fantasizing about committing a crime, even a crime of violence against a real person whom you know, is not a crime."

The court also addressed the government's questionable efforts to use the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to increase the severity of Valle's punishment: "While the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual for checking Facebook at work, we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters."

Thankfully our appeals court still has a bit of common sense. And doesn't believe in "Thought Crime" similar to George Orwell "1984" and "Animal Farm"
Post edited December 18, 2015 by Qoaa
avatar
Qoaa: I'm glad anti-political correctness/anti-sjw online won recently in the US 2nd court of appeals setting precedent.

Court's PDF Complete Casefile: http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/cannibalcop.pdf

dubbed "cannibal cop" cause he posted crazy fantasy stuff, which media went nuts and never really explained the context in which he had posted. On a "Vore" & "Dolcett" type fetish, which has a huge amount of artwork, reddit, chans, and paid sites with setup scenes.

Yea it's nuts, but it's not him that's the point it's what the court ruled on that gives freedom of speech online, and anti-pc/anti-sjw online backup and sets a precedent as all final appeal trials set precedent's for future cases.

The ruling after all the retrials and appeals from 2012 Finally ended few days ago.

Quote:

The United States 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in favor of former NYPD officer Gilberto Valle — the so-called "cannibal cop." In 2012, Valle was fired and arrested for going online and talking about his fantasies, which included kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, and cannibalism. He was later convicted in a jury trial, even though no actual crime was committed.

A district court judge overturned the conviction, but the government appealed, hoping to make it stick. The Appeals Court has now affirmed Valle's acquittal.

In the ruling (PDF), the court notes, "We are loathe to give the government the power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions. That includes the power to criminalize an individual's expression of sexual fantasies, no matter how perverse or disturbing. Fantasizing about committing a crime, even a crime of violence against a real person whom you know, is not a crime."

The court also addressed the government's questionable efforts to use the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to increase the severity of Valle's punishment: "While the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual for checking Facebook at work, we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters."

Thankfully our appeals court still has a bit of common sense. And doesn't believe in "Thought Crime" similar to George Orwell "1984" and "Animal Farm"
That does not prevent SJWs from ruining your life for something you said or censoring content. It just prevents them from throwing people to jail. But they can still silence you by perma banning you from social media or internet pages, censor the contentyou create (Pictures, art, film, video games, books, etc.) and basically silence you in any way and form possible on the media.. And when you can't speak it is not very different than going to jail.
Post edited December 18, 2015 by LeonardoCornejo
avatar
Qoaa: I'm glad anti-political correctness/anti-sjw online won recently in the US 2nd court of appeals setting precedent.

Court's PDF Complete Casefile: http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/cannibalcop.pdf

dubbed "cannibal cop" cause he posted crazy fantasy stuff, which media went nuts and never really explained the context in which he had posted. On a "Vore" & "Dolcett" type fetish, which has a huge amount of artwork, reddit, chans, and paid sites with setup scenes.

Yea it's nuts, but it's not him that's the point it's what the court ruled on that gives freedom of speech online, and anti-pc/anti-sjw online backup and sets a precedent as all final appeal trials set precedent's for future cases.

The ruling after all the retrials and appeals from 2012 Finally ended few days ago.

Quote:

The United States 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a ruling in favor of former NYPD officer Gilberto Valle — the so-called "cannibal cop." In 2012, Valle was fired and arrested for going online and talking about his fantasies, which included kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, and cannibalism. He was later convicted in a jury trial, even though no actual crime was committed.

A district court judge overturned the conviction, but the government appealed, hoping to make it stick. The Appeals Court has now affirmed Valle's acquittal.

In the ruling (PDF), the court notes, "We are loathe to give the government the power to punish us for our thoughts and not our actions. That includes the power to criminalize an individual's expression of sexual fantasies, no matter how perverse or disturbing. Fantasizing about committing a crime, even a crime of violence against a real person whom you know, is not a crime."

The court also addressed the government's questionable efforts to use the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to increase the severity of Valle's punishment: "While the Government might promise that it would not prosecute an individual for checking Facebook at work, we are not at liberty to take prosecutors at their word in such matters."

Thankfully our appeals court still has a bit of common sense. And doesn't believe in "Thought Crime" similar to George Orwell "1984" and "Animal Farm"
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: That does not prevent SJWs from ruining your life for something you said or censoring content. It just prevents them from throwing people to jail. But they can still silence you by perma banning you from social media or internet pages, censor the contentyou create (Pictures, art, film, video games, books, etc.) and basically silence you in any way and form possible on the media.. And when you can't speak it is not very different than going to jail.
I've never had that problem, I've got many of them in trouble/banned, just social engineer them, they are so gullible and not very intelligent. Many of the more popular takedowns go onto dramatica site as trophies :P

there's a popular way trolls get the sjw idiots posts deleted on twitter/facebook. you'll figure it out of ya hang around ED/SA/ and few "similar style" sites if ya know what I mean.

:)

then they throw the big temper tantrum's like a "terrible 2's" age toddler :P
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: That does not prevent SJWs from ruining your life for something you said or censoring content. It just prevents them from throwing people to jail. But they can still silence you by perma banning you from social media or internet pages, censor the contentyou create (Pictures, art, film, video games, books, etc.) and basically silence you in any way and form possible on the media.. And when you can't speak it is not very different than going to jail.
avatar
Qoaa: I've never had that problem, I've got many of them in trouble/banned, just social engineer them, they are so gullible and not very intelligent. Many of the more popular takedowns go onto dramatica site as trophies :P

there's a popular way trolls get the sjw idiots posts deleted on twitter/facebook. you'll figure it out of ya hang around ED/SA/ and few "similar style" sites if ya know what I mean.

:)

then they throw the big temper tantrum's like a "terrible 2's" age toddler :P
That is true, but Cuckerberg and other CEOs hve given them a lo of power. Also consider that many games got banned or censored by them even long before GamerGate became a thing. Exaples of this is how Japanese devs refuse to release games in Western countries because of censorship.
I am reading some inspirational story here
https://fourleggedlove.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/why-dogs-live-less-than-human-answer-of-a-6-year-old/

And I scroll down the comments and find something like this
https://fourleggedlove.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/why-dogs-live-less-than-human-answer-of-a-6-year-old/#comment-1442

No wonder the grandma live for so long