It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Djaron:
avatar
dragonbeast: something that has been very clear to me is that in terms of nudity, Europe has always been far less prude than the U.S.A., which I think might be (at least partially) because of French influence.

I feel like not everything gets set on fire the second any nudity appears here.
USA is Puritan, with Puritan morals deep inside the roots even in Social "Justice" Movements, where you can see how they banned recently LOVECRAFT in some fantasy awards, because he wrote a racist fairy tale about the creation of Black people.

I bet most part of these idiots are Christians, probably many BLACK Christians, in the bible there is even NO MENTION about the creation of Black People, not talking about the constant representation of every important character of the Bible as WHITE.

Yeah... SJW LOGIC
Post edited December 09, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
dragonbeast: something that has been very clear to me is that in terms of nudity, Europe has always been far less prude than the U.S.A., which I think might be (at least partially) because of French influence.

I feel like not everything gets set on fire the second any nudity appears here.
avatar
YaTEdiGo: USA is Puritan, with Puritan morals deep inside the roots even in Social "Justice" Movements, where you can see how they banned recently LOVECRAFT in some fantasy awards, because he wrote a racist fairy tale about the creation of Black people.

I bet most part of these idiots are Christians, probably many BLACK Christians, in the bible there is even NO MENTION about the creation of Black People, not talking about the constant representation of every important character of the Bible as WHITE.

Yeah... SJW LOGIC
Honestly I hate how SJW mindsets infested literary studies a long time ago. I am a big fan of Lovecraft, for one of my final projects during this semester in Literary studies I had to make a research paper on one of the following topics, horror literature, Murakami, or Literary translation. I picked Lovecraft and compared his mythos to the Eldrazi from Magic: The Gathering. Well, it was such a fucekd up thing to make research. All academic papers I could find about Lovecraft tended to talk about his racist tendencies at some point even if it had nothing to do with the topic. It was hard to prune information on him without a negative bias because of his racism (Which was rather common at the time). Even worse, many papers had feminist theory on them even when it was not pertinent. I decided to search the same databse for papers with criticism toward feminism, I found none. You can't get your paper published if it has no SJW shit in it.
Hello guys.

I made a humorous GOG mix titled "Feminist Frequency's seal of aproval"

It contains very awesome games which I am sure Sarkeesian and McIntosh would frown. Basically if they hate it is guaranteed to be good. Give it votes if that is OK with you.
Post edited December 09, 2015 by LeonardoCornejo
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Basically if they hate it is guaranteed to be good.
A bit of a logical fallacy you got there. I'm afraid that your claim, as it is currently stated, would not adhere to even the (all too modest) standards for high-school essay writing.

There's nothing wrong with publishing a list of games that a particular person disapproves of. In fact it'd be interesting to look at such a list, especially if the reasons for the person's dissatisfaction with the games are also provided. That said, declaring the games to be good based of the dislike alone, is somewhat ... laughable.
Post edited December 09, 2015 by Alaric.us
avatar
USERNAME:LeonardoCornejo#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6260#Q&_^Q&Q#Basically if they hate it is guaranteed to be good.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6260#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good games that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.

I am not suer if you are a Vulcan or just a supporter of Feminist Frequency, but if the point of the joke eludes you then I am no one to help with that, I would like to be able to help you with your lack of humor, but well, I can't.
Post edited December 09, 2015 by LeonardoCornejo
avatar
YaTEdiGo: USA is Puritan, with Puritan morals deep inside the roots even in Social "Justice" Movements, where you can see how they banned recently LOVECRAFT in some fantasy awards, because he wrote a racist fairy tale about the creation of Black people.

I bet most part of these idiots are Christians, probably many BLACK Christians, in the bible there is even NO MENTION about the creation of Black People, not talking about the constant representation of every important character of the Bible as WHITE.

Yeah... SJW LOGIC
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: Honestly I hate how SJW mindsets infested literary studies a long time ago. I am a big fan of Lovecraft, for one of my final projects during this semester in Literary studies I had to make a research paper on one of the following topics, horror literature, Murakami, or Literary translation. I picked Lovecraft and compared his mythos to the Eldrazi from Magic: The Gathering. Well, it was such a fucekd up thing to make research. All academic papers I could find about Lovecraft tended to talk about his racist tendencies at some point even if it had nothing to do with the topic. It was hard to prune information on him without a negative bias because of his racism (Which was rather common at the time). Even worse, many papers had feminist theory on them even when it was not pertinent. I decided to search the same databse for papers with criticism toward feminism, I found none. You can't get your paper published if it has no SJW shit in it.
When I was 8 years old, I asked in Religion class when talking about Adan & Eve BS where all the Black and Asians came from, the "teacher" big brackets... was so utterly pissed off with me...

So yes, is legit to satanize, never better said, Lovecraft, but hey! Religions legends are so inclusive... so equalitarian... that's why Scammers like Anita Sarkesian chosen such an EASY topic to flame their community, she is not going to be shoot down with an AK47 or have half america outraged with her for touching religions... but videogames?

So easy, BUT I also should condemn how STUPID were people blaming ZOE QUINN for sleep which whoever she wanted, for whatever advantage she could get... her bastard ex-boyfriend is a big supporter of SJW in some way for making this story "relevant"
Post edited December 09, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good games that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.
I'm sure FF wouldn't like the classic fallouts (Bethesda didn't remove prostitution did they?).
avatar
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good games that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.

I am not suer if you are a Vulcan or just a supporter of Feminist Frequency, but if the point of the joke eludes you then I am no one to help with that, I would like to be able to help you with your lack of humor, but well, I can't.
Hahaha I am not always agree totally with you, but this speech about Humor, (Something that religious people is so afraid of, including Muslims and easy offended groups of people, that even if atheists are more close to Puritan believes that they can even imagine) that was a great one, not to mention the Vulcan thing.

Kudos.
avatar
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good fames that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.
That's all wonderful, however:

a) If they use fallacies how are you able to both decry them as evil and at the same time use that as an excuse to use your own fallacies? Surely this is either an evil act that should be condemned or a good reason to respond in kind. It cannot be both.

b) I will gladly check out the games in your list if you provide a link. However, I am not arguing about the merits of the games in your list, whatever they may be. I am arguing against the blanket statement, which happens to be a logical fallacy.

P.S. — Note, I am not supporting those people. I don't know them, nor their arguments, so it would be impossible for me to support them.
avatar
USERNAME:LeonardoCornejo#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6262#Q&_^Q&Q#It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good fames that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6262#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
Sorry, ad hominem there, in both directions by the way.
Post edited December 09, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good games that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.
avatar
Rusty_Gunn: I'm sure FF wouldn't like the classic fallouts (Bethesda didn't remove prostitution did they?).
Until now I have included only games I played for more than 24 hours so I am sure those games deserve a place on the list, so does Duke Nukem and the classic Shadow Warrior. I will constantly update the list if it proves successful and will include games others have played, I will take into account the classic Fallout games and Duke Nukem among others to include them once the list becomes popular.
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: It is not an essay. It is humor. Don't you understand the concept of humor? It is not logycal, it is not academic, it is not even educational. And if you ask me, as a college student, I realized that academic writing is no longer as objective or rational as it was meant to be. Logical fallacies are the lesser of many evils that plague academy, and as a plot twist, Feminist frequency abuses many fallacies including ad hominem and confirmation bias. Also, if you checked the games in the mix you will realize that I am not mistaken in this case. Now, I know there are good games that they like such as Beyond Good and Evil. If I said any game they like is bad then I would be mistaken.

I am not suer if you are a Vulcan or just a supporter of Feminist Frequency, but if the point of the joke eludes you then I am no one to help with that, I would like to be able to help you with your lack of humor, but well, I can't.
avatar
YaTEdiGo: Hahaha I am not always agree totally with you, but this speech about Humor, (Something that religious people is so afraid of, including Muslims and easy offended groups of people, that even if atheists are more close to Puritan believes that they can even imagine) that was a great one, not to mention the Vulcan thing.

Kudos.
Wow, thank you. I am flattered, and glad you mentioned you don't agree with me all the time. That is crucial to achieve freedom and harmony. Being able to disagree with others even if they are on your side is important. In fact many of my friends disagree with me on my political views but are still my friends. Imagine if anti SJWs ageeed on everything. They would behave like SJWs quite fast because no one would say "Wait, maybe that is not right."
avatar
YaTEdiGo:
avatar
YaTEdiGo:
You can easily find the mix on the HuniePop game page on GOG because it is one of the few mixes including that game. Now, I guess you lack sense of humor to the point that even Tuvok would find you cold and Spok would feel ashamed of a human being more logycal than him. However I will explain it to you. It is a joke. It is biased, flawed, and fallacious. If I were to write an academic essay I would be careful to avoid such a thing (Therefore trying to take the formalist approach wich avoids paying attention to the views of the author.) But this is a joke, a piece of humor, not meant to make much sense or be useful for academy. It might be biased, fallacious, and even factually inaccurate, because it is a joke.

I just pointed out that you scrutinize my joke as if it was an academic work while many academic works are allowed to be even worse than that.

Also I decry Feminist Frequency not because of their fallacies but because they publish them as academic work, treat them as truths, and use them to censor and slander. If they were a comedy group making jokes, or even fiction writers, I could not decry them for being fallacious.
Post edited December 09, 2015 by LeonardoCornejo
avatar
LeonardoCornejo: You can easily find the mix on the HuniePop game page on GOG because it is one of the few mixes including that game. Now, I guess you lack sense of humor to the point that even Tuvok would find you cold and Spok would feel ashamed of a human being more logycal than him. However I will explain it to you. It is a joke. It is biased, flawed, and fallacious. If I were to write an academic essay I would be careful to avoid such a thing (Therefore trying to take the formalist approach wich avoids paying attention to the views of the author.) But this is a joke, a piece of humor, not meant to make much sense or be useful for academy. It might be biased, fallacious, and even factually inaccurate, because it is a joke.

I just pointed out that you scritinize my joke as if it was an academic work while many academic works are allowed to be even worse than that.
When arguing against the people whom you believe to be vile and not above making false or exaggerated claims about you and your point of view, it is important to avoid formulating arguments in such a way that would make it easy for them to do that. If your joke was picked up by your opponents, being the way you describe them, they would likely use it to paint you in an extremely negative light. I have nothing against you, so I merely pointed out the fallacy. They, on the other hand, would probably mean to do something else entirely. Your lighthearted comment might end up as a visual aid, serving the opposite purpose than the one you intended for it. And, unlike on this forum, you would never have a chance to explain that it was a joke or mock their lack of good humor.

That said, you are not wrong. You are just going about it the less optimal way.
avatar
USERNAME:LeonardoCornejo#Q&_^Q&Q#GROUP:4#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6268#Q&_^Q&Q#You can easily find the mix on the HuniePop game page on GOG because it is one of the few mixes including that game. Now, I guess you lack sense of humor to the point that even Tuvok would find you cold and Spok would feel ashamed of a human being more logycal than him. However I will explain it to you. It is a joke. It is biased, flawed, and fallacious. If I were to write an academic essay I would be careful to avoid such a thing (Therefore trying to take the formalist approach wich avoids paying attention to the views of the author.) But this is a joke, a piece of humor, not meant to make much sense or be useful for academy. It might be biased, fallacious, and even factually inaccurate, because it is a joke.

I just pointed out that you scritinize my joke as if it was an academic work while many academic works are allowed to be even worse than that.#Q&_^Q&Q#LINK:6268#Q&_^Q&Q#
avatar
Well, thank you for your honest opinion and for being more cyvil than I am in fact.

Now, I know this could be used against me or against GamerGate as a whole by our detractors. But I no longer care. Not to mention I included in the review of one of the games an explanation stating this was for humorous purposes. Of course, if they find out (And they will) I will become a target and be used as a tool against GG. But almost any GG supporter that has used satyre or mocked SJWs has been through that already, so, well, I am not that worried about that. I am more worried about people not finding it funny, because if not even a single person other than myself finds it funny, then it failed as a joke.
I am not a GG supporter, I am supporting sense, not BS, I think that all the rage vs. Zoe Quinn was pure BS, so in base to this someone could say that at the beginning GG was BS to me, and it was YES, but at the same time all the rage vs. GG is BS, and GG detractors show many times how SICK they are, making their own cause too, BS...

And I think Sarkesian and people like her are just Con Artists, Crows, and Scavengers that born and grow in this new era of "political BS in videogames" that cames with too mature guilty " I never do anything for the world " people that grow up playing videogames and seeing STARWARS and suddenly in their almost 30s to 50s they believe our FUNNY BS (Videogames) is a TOOL TO CHANGE THE WORLD... oooOhhoOoohhhhHH I CHANGE THE WORLD ON TWITTER AND THE INTERNET, I AM A GOOD PERSON BY PLAYING MORE SOCIAL AND MORAL GAMES, THE WORLD IS CHANGING WITH MY P̶O̶P̶ LAZY CULTURE ACTIONS!!!

haha hahahahaha, hahahahahaha LOL hahahahaha... ah... haha (Sick sad, laugh... drama ) http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/All-Meme-Faces-16.png
Post edited December 09, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
avatar
YaTEdiGo: I am not a GG supporter, I am supporting sense, not BS, I think that all the rage vs. Zoe Quinn was pure BS, so in base to this someone could say that the beginning of GG was BS to me, it was yes, but at the same time all the rage vs. GG is BS, and GG detractors show many times how SICK they are, making their own cause too, BS...

And I think Sarkesian and people like her are just Con Artists, Crows, and Scavengers that born and grow in this new era of "political BS in videogames" that cames with too mature guilty " I never do anything for the world " people that grow up playing videogames and seeing STARWARS and suddenly in their almost 30s to 50s they believe our FUNNY BS (Videogames) is a TOOL TO CHANGE THE WORLD... oooOhhoOoohhhhHH I CHANGE THE WORLD ON TWITTER PLAYING MORE SOCIAL AND MORAL GAMES, THE WORLD IS CHANGING WITH MY P̶O̶P̶ LAZY CULTURE!!!

haha hahahahaha, hahahahahaha LOL hahahahaha... ah... haha (Sick sad, laugh... drama ) http://memesvault.com/wp-content/uploads/All-Meme-Faces-16.png
Well, the infamous Zoe post is not even relevant to GG anymore. It was only relevant because one of the guys she slept with acclaimed her game. It was not trully against her but against the guy. I frown her cheating, but I would not make a big deal over it. What bothers me and most gamers is not her actions but her partner's actions and her reaction to our frowning of that man's actions. If her game were not acclaimed by people who had a clear conflict of interests it would be just another case of cheating and promiscuity.