ryannaughton1138: RWarehall
Excuses? The article had links to other articles. It sited sources. That's not making excuses, that's backing your your points.
You are such the troll aren't you...
Obviously critical thinking is not being taught in schools these days. No, its a bad article and here's why...
Anyone who uses a stupid, poorly thought out and misleading statistic as the 77% one, which your author repeated in various forms multiple times, is a liar and deceiver. You, Ryan are too.
Anyone with half a brain can tell you that just adding up all the wages of women and adding up all the wages of men and calling that a "wage gap" is grossly misleading. Anyone with half a brain realizes that many women stay at home or work part-time jobs to support a family's children and education. So really, it takes a lying asshole to quote that statistic in the first place. Because that figure is 100% meaningless. It's rubbish. And it in no way reflects how much an equally qualified woman makes vs a man.
Anyone using that crap statistic is intentionally misleading the public for their cause making them a "social justice warrior" aka "asshole to the fullest". These people, like you Ryan, aren't here to talk about the truth, nope you and your "special friends" are here to lie and deceive anyone you can con into your lies and distortions.
Just look at the shell game the author of that article tried to pull...
She states 77% is exaggerated as a myth by arguing their are many ways to measure it. You can go by annual earnings or you can be by weekly earnings. Or you can even take an example of a 25-year old woman who would have earned $5,000 less at that point in her career.
Basically all gross distortions. All of them use the same distorted statistical method involving the average wage of a woman. All of them ignore the fact that this average is lower because many women work less or not at all intentionally. But she still doubles down on their use.
And we can go into other parts of her articles where she cherry-picks the "ripest" stats by going through the Labor Statistics and finding the careers with the biggest wage gaps and using those as examples. I bet if you did the same thing with men, you could try to argue men are making less by cherry-picking careers where women make more.
Pamela Coukos is just a con artist and frankly I find it amusing you are linking to a blog of all things for your "facts". One-sided opinion pieces are usually not the place to start.