Modding down? Something was cut out? Posts are auto-moderated now? What happened?
I don't think its very recent. I've met many people who are vegetarians or know about it and none of them seem to have heard of veganism. I only heard about it after stumbling onto their subreddit from KiA. And I don't think anyone here is gonna not consume diary products, since nearly every second dish we have probably has some diary or diary derivative in it.
Yes its down for me as well.

What the fuck. It better not taste any different.

Remember ? Well kids, that's right, it wasn't enough for the sjws because now [url=http://www.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/news/1015-racism-and-sexism-in-heavy-metal-highlighted-in-new-study/]Thor, heavy metal music and dressing up as a Viking are all racist. Apparently heavy metal can be seen to normalise masculinity and whiteness :-o And of course Viking cosplay is all racist and nasty not because it perpetuates racial stereotypes or because of cultural appropriation but because it reinforces oppression towards “ethnic minorities”. Really? But didn't Vikings mostly "oppress" other whites?

Not to mention that the Vikings had about the most rigid and progressive laws against rape...

Something to do with the Norse God Odin (aka Wotan)?

A lot of people claim a drastic improvement in health when switching from a meat based diet to vegetarian. I guess it's very much about the individual. It's a very personal sort of thing.


And in other news ... For those who doubt the fact that Sjws are "harvesting" children thru so-called government "child protection" agencies for, amongst others, govt officials including congress critters such as Denny "child-raping bastard" Hastert, please watch this in-depth analysis ...

... and its follow up. Just a warning - some of the subject matter herein may be disturbing and upsetting, depressing ... etc


And for the rest of you who think that the revelation of wholesale sexual molestation of children by pedophile politicians is too "4chan" ... here's a treat for you from the UK's Daily Mirror - "Sexy sex-bot runs amok!"

By your own admission you've watched a few minutes and written the whole thing off. These people are hard working dedicated real researchers into deep geo-political subject matter, unlike the high paid corporate shills in msm. If you watched the whole thing you would hear him mention "links in the show notes" that back up everything they talk about. It would not be worth their reputations to lie or make unsubstantiated statements about anything. They rely on the trust and support of their viewers to continue their work. And when ever they do occasionally make an error they are the first to admit it - these are people of exceptional integrity.

If you have the mental ability and emotional maturity and concentration span I recommend you go back and watch the entire two programs or "Sexy sex-bot runs amok!" might be better suited to you. ;-)

For three of the video I click, they last about 1 hour each with people talking and talking but no evidence except he / she say this and that. One video is even about 1 hour for part one for a total of 5 part. I got to watch 5 hours to prove my mental and emotional capability? Can you blame me for fast forwarding? No wonder the title come with something like "no one gives a damn"

The links is also mostly this and that people say this and that. And one or two high ranking people is guilty.

So with one or two people guilty the whole of government is guilty? And how SJW come into play about it as you claim?

On the other hand, maybe I miss them fast forwarding in hours and hours of video, but I am too tired to challenge that.

Usually if one is used to consuming mainstream media which serves up its lies and propaganda in small highly processed pieces it may be difficult to jump straight into lengthy in-depth material that requires a sort of "participation" from those watching and listening to it.

It's a bit like. detoxing, going from junk foods to whole foods. Sometimes you have to do it gradually.

I am sorry, I mean no offense. I think it is more a matter of efficiency rather then being better than mainstream media.

If the message can be conveyed in 10 minutes, why drag for more and an hour?

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-investigators-apologize-deleting-evidence-paedophile-ring/

The link show an example of a more efficient way of getting the message through.

Even the half hour plus video are packed with pictures, victim testimonial, video of the offender in action. That made it much more convincing than a group of people speculating for an hour without seeing the meat.

Wow, this thread really went to hell in hand-basket.

It is really sad to see, that stuff like this isn't only happening in Germany:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWiQijckYKM

It's about people in the highest political circle here involved in such things and getting rid of proof.
When I was younger, I thought our CDU is just like Montgomery Burns' little political circle, but in reality they are far worse.

Yes, that is a much more compact form of "news coverage" and yes it is similar/related subject matter. But the point is it's served up and presented in a certain way with, in all likely-hood, all sorts of information omitted and facts distorted. Just to make the point again - what msm gives people to consume and what small groups of independent and essentially uncompromised journalistas like James Corbett and Sibel Edmunds provide are very different and the content is different and the intention is different. Mainstream media (and as they point out much of the alt media) are there to confuse and obfuscate by disseminating dis/misinformation and propaganda, whereas these independent researchers are able to bring you truth uncompromised. That's precisely why you can have a lengthy in-depth analysis of subject matter that can meander in all sorts of directions. They're entirely different creatures. If you're used to just msm it may be difficult to digest it all at once. My suggestion is to keep digging. ;-)
Why? Because we're discussing a difficult and uncomfortable subject - the elephant in the living room, that western politics, religious institutions and mainstream media are infested with the worst and most vile vermin there ever was. This instead of prevaricating endlessly and pointlessly over spoiled neofems and Sjws having a hissy fit over video games. A subject Sjws won't go near precisely because so many of them are involved directly or indirectly.

noncompliantgame

It's not because it's difficult or uncomfortable, it's because this is absurd, and non existent. This is has gone from being about "ethics in journalism"(which has lost all meaning at this point) to talking about child sex trafficking rings run by some great sjw plot, and your proof is articles from conspiracy theory websites.

To quote Pappa Lazarou, this is just a saga now.

Indeed, the involved groups are what we could call our enemy. Their actions go into areas which are considered wrong no matter who you are. Child sexual abuse, unethical disinformation (The only kind of disinformation), discrimination based on age, gender, race, ethnicity, etc., and the list goes on. This is what results from moral relativism, having no principles and no honor. I bet some SJWs would actually give their own children to child molesters such as Nyberg if they could.