In fact Theon was also forced to "join in". Susurrus, you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. It was much tamer than the book. Get your facts straight.

Also funny how you claim criticism isn't censorship when your criticism is that THE SHOW SHOULDN"T SHOW RAPE SCENES! You are calling for it's censorship. What a moron...

I think you have that wrong somehow. I don't think men can be raped...you know patriarchy, dominance, misogyny, somethingsomething...

I know as many men who got raped as I know women with such a backstory and seeing how hesitant the males are about it because of the reactions especcially from people who claim to be fighting for social justice and in fact are only fighting against men in every way they can, including victim shaming, not believing, etc...there surely are plenty more who don't even try to talk about it. Such reactions can be really terrible. Oh but I forgot, fighting for men's rights is defending "the perpetrators" and never victims of any sort, how silly of me.

I think the big problem with a lot of the SJW "outrage" trolls is that they don't watch or play the games movies or TV they are complaining about. They hear about it from their friends in their echo chambers, and come out to forums to complain about it, acting as if they had. Just like with the GTA V outrage, their echo chambers didn't tell them how virtually every NPC can be killed, so they really believe only the prostitutes are the ones getting killed. Just as they believe only Sansa got raped or how it "wasn't in the book".

In essence, if their SJW buddies don't tell them something, it didn't happen.

Subjectivity as ethics!

Sorry, too good to pass... and taking the opportunity.

American History X - the rape is crucial plot point.

>watch GoT
>still need extra warning for assault violence and sexual abuse

and i criticized people saying they had a PTSD attack when all they did was feel a little shock and breathed a bit heavier. Is that PTSD? Is that not trivializing a serious medical case? Demeaning the value from people who ACTUALLY SUFFER FROM IT?

And if there is no medicine for PTSD, then we need to start working on one. Since PTSD is linked to sudden over stimulation of nerves and berserk neurotransmitters, it shouldn't be impossible. Almost every mental issue can be suppressed with pills.

And if something is an important and serious issue, why should it be barred from appearing in a show? Genocide is horrible, so ban anything that dare mentions it? If i see no evil there is no evil?

"You see people being strongly affected by rape as somehow irrational.
Is that what you're saying here? Because quite frankly that's bloody silly. "

no, It is normal this strongly affects people. That is bloody obvious and normal. What isn't is RAGING and burning and threatening something for displaying it.

"CRITICISM IS NOT CENSORSHIP.
Free speech, etc. "

difference between critism and "THE CREATOR DESERVE TO DIE THOSE FUCKING RAPE APOLOGISTS FUCK THEM GAME OF THRONES IS THE WORST THING ON EARTH FUCK YOU FOR WATCHING IT"

Murder affects relatives of victims very strong and survivors of attempted murder too, so ban all murder mystery shows?

"1.) I'm not sure about you, but fully-functional humans can maintain multiple stances at once and act upon many of them simultaneously.
In short: People are angry about more than one injustice. If you don't see it expressed constantly, that might be because it's tiring or not relevant to the particular subject. "

Yet when gg focuses on games media and not all media that doesn't count anymore. Nope. It's ok if antis do it though.

New exclusion program for getting mechanics-concentrated non propaganda game game devs out of unis : http://www.reaxxion.com/9006/digra-wants-to-ban-non-sjws-from-entering-college-game-design-programs

No.

No.

No.

...it goes on like that.

It's a four year old study that evaluates what skills aspiring game designers need to have in order to be getting a job in the industry. The sole intent is to evaluate what the industry de facto asks of and needs from designers, and how these qualities can be taught to students.

There's no news. There's no perceivable "exclusion" and there's no proposed "program" here.

And look what the worst site on the internet has made out of it. These guys are getting fairly desperate.

Actually worthwhile reading experiences on gamergate's belated "coverage" of DiGRA 2015:

http://torillsin.blogspot.com.au/2015/05/digra-2015-aftermath-hashtag-anger.html
http://ungaming.tumblr.com/post/119569355555/observations-on-gamergates-belated-response-to

So let's see, you once again refuse to discuss the actual article and instead merely provide unrelated, obviously one-sided links...

Yup, this is what goes for "proof" by SJW's...

Edit: Interesting how Vain chooses to "edit in" an explanation. A bad one at that, given he has clearly not actually read the paper referred to. Another interesting note about the paper, notice how it refers to a "Gamasutra" article I think that speaks volumes about the authors...

Yup, from the paper itself...notice how they don't actually discuss this part of their conclusion in the paper. This sure as heck does sound like these researchers are striving at a particular agenda to me...
Or in other words, change the games by changing the types of developers....

The basis of the article is a wild supposition. It automatically assumes INTJs, ISTJs and ENTJs naturally make the games they want to play, (without proof; yay, element of social justice).

Trigger warning: Sargon!

Appropriate old Sargon discussions involving DiGRA...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rouq-VdgXdo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28D6_8KuIpc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJyU7RSvs_s&list=PLM9L2W5aOI_1zFJPiJST1GpxOTP-qomDS&index=6

Well researched, very interesting, is it all mere coincidence....?

Edit log: Almost forgot the trigger warning for you SJW types, I mean that would be cruel to forget...

Indeed, evolution can go both ways, like everything else in the entire universe bar where there is hipster support on one side; where the hipster supported side is objectively better.

They make the games "they want to play" on the one hand, yet "they have subjected themselves to" on the other. Read that publication, it's actually interesting. You have to forget the mind numbing reaxxion article first, of course.

But, hey, let's discuss your "new" and the "exclusion" bits first! reaxxion describes the publication as something totally different than it is, and that begins with Roberts' headline, which is, practically word for word, incorrect.

"DiGra" as a whole "wants" nothing here, no new requirements for accepting students are proposed (hence no ban), the fight for "social justice" doesn't come into play, and don't even get me started on the use of the word "college" here. Obviously, the entire world only consists of the US of A.

Mr. Sam Roberts has no idea what he's talking about, and spectacularly misses any kind of context he could ever use. Instead, Roberts desperately peppers his article with games that serve as triggering enemy concepts for the people that read this website: Candy Crush, Fruit Ninja, Depression Quest. Or gaming platforms: mobile, cell-phone.

A quick comparison shows that none of those games or platforms are even mentioned in the publication! Roberts is speaking about something entirely different than the text he supposedly talks about. Is it just his reading comprehension, or is there an agenda?

reaxxion is a fascist propaganda website read by an abject hate mob. That, and only that. As of now, it serves as the leading gamergate website. And that is incredibly damning for the movement.