Good one! :D
Wait, since we are supposed to be living in a thorough "patriarchy".... and the "consensus of opinion" (=Wikipedia) is saying that #gg is a misogynist harrassing-group and that masculists do not primarily stand for equality... doesn't this mean, that the "patriarchy" is fighting itself?

*mind blown* :D

Opinion?

EFFING LOL!!!!!

Have you been keeping up to date with Wikipedia's editor drama recently mate?

And yeah evidence trumps feels every time.

LOL yeah, I did kind of throw that in as a bit of a troll, TBH, nice come back though, well played!

It's a bit like The Independent actually http://www.independent.co.uk/ - I enjoy reading their articles because I agree with mostly everything they say but, precisely BECAUSE of that it's a bit laughable that they're suppose to be unbiased and not heavily left-leaning, unless they gave up on the whole 'unbiased' thing a while back and I didn't notice...

So the feminists want to corner the "Rape joke" market?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWaCMel2FLg

I recall someone said GG is a culmination of the culture war between liberals and conservatives; with the obvious flaw that feminine and masculine characteristics, listen and believe, shoot down stuff you don't like and so much other good stuff is monarchical, not liberal or conservative.

Anyhow; we can define GG as the culmination of the culture war between the people who let their emotion decide what justice is and people who let facts decide what justice is. Plain and simple, its a war where one side wants to procreate hivemind groupthink justice and the other side wants to continue with fact and evidence based justice.

That was a joke?

Yeah, I agree with this
you telling me that "I was raped when my mother called someone else's daughter a slut" is serious?

That video belittles those that have been physically violated

I thought it was in full seriousness... If it worked or not, is another mater completely.

Anyway, I guess that if this woman was selling t-shirts with "My family raped me (joke)" on them, she would have been getting complaints to.

SJW corruption of the English language...

If someone disagrees with you, call it "rape" and anyone who agrees with them is part of their "hate group".

So why does shooting the messenger have any effect on their message? Why are you so interested in their character assassination by association? Is this because you can't argue the facts? Is it because it appears the facts are they were unjustly removed from the convention?


And seriously, maybe you ought to do a bit of reading up on your beloved SPLC. There are many articles one can find discussing many of their choices of what they are now calling "hate groups". They seem to have gone far beyond antisemitism and now seem to call a lot of conservatives "hate groups". Ron Paul, Glenn Beck, Michelle Bachmann are listed on their site as "enablers" of hate groups. Their list is far from objective. But hey, I'm sure you think all conservatives are part of a hate group anyway...

Would you expect a Klansman in full regalia to be granted entrance and be allowed to express his views?

Social justice = causing pain and suffering to wrong doer. Kill all aspects of his life.

Logical justice = punish the crime, punish the individual who did it.

In their emotional blind hatred, they forget to think or are too strongly indoctrinated into thinking their opinions are either the majority and hence in the right or are morally right and hence in the right. It'll help everyone understand our antiGG friends more.

Strawman very much? The Honey Badgers are not the KKK. Do a little fucking research...
You seem to just be a hateful individual who sees everyone who disagrees with you as the enemy and want to character assassinate them. Who the hell do you think you are that you get to decide who can attend a convention or not? Is this what you mean by "diversity"? Diversity composed of like-thinking people to yourself.

And all this MRA talk...
You do know most of these organizations do one thing and one thing only, right? They defend men's rights in divorces. I know that pisses off feminists who think God appointed them to be the sole best care for all children, but seriously...

I meant - do you expect people to be able to associate and affiliate themselves with hate groups like the KKK and A Voice for Men and still expect to not be seen as hate-mongers spreading hate?
I can totally see that, to the Calgary organisers, someone who identifies themselves as an MRA and broadcasts on AVFM and who is also openly pro-GG, as part of that mix, might as well be wearing a white bedsheet in so much as you'd want them out of your con just as much
You keep talking about truth and evidence and logic while at the same time your posts display exactly none as you spew random, hate-filled haikus that are only tangentially connected to the flow of the discussion and then only if you squint and turn your head to the side a bit...