Yes, it's still there now as I write this.

Then *if* it is not claimed, I wouldn't mind adding it to my library. (Dangerous Dave, for who didn't read the post above)

psc=paysafecard
Know anyone who has a card? You might be able to do like me and pay them to add that amount to your GOG wallet.

It is still on the list, but was requested in post #2241.

Thank you DampSquib and zeogold. *erase*erase*erase* our benevolent dictator for life.

I know.
People are fast.

Please read the first post. The giveaway in this thread is meant for active members of the community. Participate a bit more, join some threads, etc., and you can come back after you're a bit more well-known. Not to mention the fact that your privacy settings prevent anybody from talking with you anyways as it is.
Denied due to lack of participation.
I have no personal issue with it since I would think it would be the same thing as Ghorpm turning on that ESP of his again and managing to ask for a game minutes after I add it to the list. No clue how the rest of the community feels, though.
So would I, friend. So would I.
...but seriously, please read the first post in the thread.
Sometimes, when adding games to the list, I'll find that my screen will spontaneously burst into flames.
It's a dangerous job.
Granted.
Also granted.
Granted as well.

Thanks to both zegold and astroclay for Little Big Planet 2. Appreciate it.

Problem solved since it's not on my wishlist and I may also be the one GOGer that is not at all interested in the game ;)
But I know what you mean so the above was basically joking - however please don't nominate me for this game even though I would appreciate the thought :)

I wouldn't. This is a GA with a clear set of rules. If it's within the rules, I'm happy for anyone who gets the game, even if I would've wanted it myself, too.

Besides, the same could happen with any limit we set; i.e. suppose the limit for games like this would be 24 hours before being allowed to ask/nominate for it. Then we would all have seen it, but the game would still go to the first eligible person who asked for it after those 24 hours. Only difference is that we would all have seen it and maybe would be sitting behind the keyboard waiting to send a request the very second that the time limit was over. I don't see that as a better option tbh (plus, it would create a nightmare for zeo deciding whether the request came in before or after the set deadline).

Thanks to zeogold for sending me the key and also thanks to Point_Man for donating The Witcher: Enhanced Edition.

My feeling is that we - the participants of this community giveaway - are not mindless automatons. We are not blindly pursuing the extraction of the maximum amount of value possible. We can exercise our own judgment. If a highly in demand game gets added to the list, then yes, we could "take advantage" of that. Or we could exercise restraint. And the determination of what to do will vary based on circumstances.
If I knew that MarkoH01 really, really wanted the game that was just added, and if I felt that he is a positive influence (which he is), that in combination he would be the 'most deserving' for the game, I'd nominate him without hesitation. But in the absence of such factors, I'd refrain from doing so.

Agreed. More rules just creates more opportunity for finding problems with those rules, either intentionally or unintentionally.

I do think it's useful to ask such questions, and to collectively ponder and discuss such topics, to help build a shared understanding of what we care about. (Input from old-timers in particular can help with that, to see if we can't strengthen the remaining vestiges from the culture of the days of yore.)

oh im dumb

Well so am I.

It's not a crime!