langurmonkey: Don't those idiots understand that child proof also means = pain in the fucking ass for everyone and not really 100% child proof. Not all human babies are stupid. Just most of them.
timppu: Exactly! If the brightest babies are able to open the medicin bottles and other household chemicals and die horrible deaths due to them, only the stupid babies survive. Is that really what we want? That's against the Darwin Awards paradigm.
They should make "smart proof" lids on bottles which only the dumbest kids are able to open.
Yes, it is unfortunate that the grim reaper, not only takes stupid people but also ignorant people or people at the wrong time, wrong place. If the grim reaper only took stupid people, Star Trek would be more than just TV shows and movies but reality right now. My point is intelligent babies can easily open those "child proof" bottles. But due to their ignorance and them being babies, they could die from eating what they think is candy. So if child proof bottles aren't 100%, they should go away because all they really do is inconvenience people and save stupid babies. They also offer parents a false sense of security if the parents have intelligent offspring and that is bad. And it really isn't good for the future of Earth, if the few intelligent babies in the world, eat the "candy" inside and die leaving only babies who weren't able to figure out how to open the press down and twist bottles. We have enough stupid people in this world, sucking up all the oxygen right now, we don't need more.
PS
Not serious about being okay with stupid people(including stupid babies who will grow up to be stupid people) dying. I'm just really mad at stupid people right now. Deep down, I believe all life is precious.