teceem: I guess you're assuming that this is about
the one and only source of information.
Not at all, the fact that I was trying to demonstrate that your argumentation was flawed doesn't mean I'm assuming what you just said. That's another fallacy btw.
Spectre: That sounds like a lawyer that's upset with people getting free legal advice.
Where is the place of nice scientists that exist to answer peoples questions on a whim? I have about 10,000 to ask.
Maybe, but I never said I was against anyone seeking information, I just questioned the reason behind doing so here, and afterwards, I questioned the logical validity of a flawed argumentation.
I have to say I'm a bit confused about the nature of your question, if it's rhetorical then forget about what I'm saying but if it's not, then (obviating the sense of entitlement) I propose the creation of a 'scientific hotline' for people in search of answers, that's a great business opportunity you have in there (no joke).