It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Mr.Mumbles: Pish posh. They're clearly consentacles! ;)
avatar
WinterSnowfall: For the record, I had to look that up. Clearly I am not the pervert I thought I was! I will now depart in shame :P.
Wait... that's an actual thing? I thought Mr.Mumbles was just making a pun :D
low rated
avatar
§pec†re: There is no hypocrisy because they are completely different subjects based on different motivations.
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: It is a double-standard, because one is policed and the other isn't. Stranger still, the one that gets persecuted doesn't advocate harming people by itself. This is unfair, stupid, and ethically questionable.
It isn't, because they are both policed and sexual content is a different subject from general violence.
Saying they are the same is like those who use the argument that everything is art to try and claim that some piece of rubbish is the same as a genuine work of art.
avatar
Sabin_Stargem: It is a double-standard, because one is policed and the other isn't. Stranger still, the one that gets persecuted doesn't advocate harming people by itself. This is unfair, stupid, and ethically questionable.
avatar
§pec†re: It isn't, because they are both policed and sexual content is a different subject from general violence.
Saying they are the same is like those who use the argument that everything is art to try and claim that some piece of rubbish is the same as a genuine work of art.
the problem, though, is who decide what is or what is not art? For example Tracy Emin's bed, Carl Andre's 'Bricks', Damine Hirst;s 'Mother and Child'. Piet Mondrian's 'Composition in Yellow' / 'Composition in red', David Buliuk's "Dedication to Cezanne', Robert Mapplethorpe's 'The Perfect Moment' and so on ans so forth. Who is the arbiter of what is or what is not art?

edit - not to mention the whole Dadaist movement....
Post edited September 01, 2021 by amok
WTH is it all about?

PORN is just a business sex is just a transaction from a person to a person
read that lot of people stuck in 1699 with ancient old idea's about sex and porn.

steam sells porn games including this one "Subverse"

btw GOG should include also the following

Sex with the devil
Operation Lovecraft
AI Shoujo
avatar
Mafwek: You know what they say - One's man's garbage is another man's treasure.
avatar
morolf: I don't agree with moral and aesthetic relativism, my taste is objectively superior to that of people who disagree with me (and no, that's not up for debate).
boy oh boy, you must be fan at parties with that ego of yours
avatar
Mr.Mumbles: Pish posh. They're clearly consentacles! ;)
avatar
WinterSnowfall: For the record, I had to look that up. Clearly I am not the pervert I thought I was! I will now depart in shame :P.
Uh... Yay me? *slightly embarrassed now*
avatar
Breja: I thought Mr.Mumbles was just making a pun :D
It sure is one, just one that's been around for some time. ;)
Post edited September 01, 2021 by Mr.Mumbles
shame ! you started this list I will sort it : )

The Ditzy Demons Are in Love With Me #
The Witch's Love Diary #
Kindred Spirits on the Roof
A Kiss For The Petals - Maidens of Michael #
A Kiss For The Petals - Remembering How We Met
Mary Skelter: Nightmares
Subverse
HuniePop #
HuniePop 2: Double Date #
Ne no Kami: The Two Princess Knights of Kyoto #
Ne no Kami - The Two Princess Knights of Kyoto Part 2 #
Shining Song Starnova Limited Edition #
Highway Blossoms #
Heart of the Woods #
Amairo Chocolate #
Princess Evangile W Happiness #

# 18+ patch available

anything to add, please ?
edit: thanks!
Post edited September 01, 2021 by user deleted
Yep, you missed a few possible 18+ patches:

Shining Song Starnova, HuniePop 1 + 2 have optional 18+ patches as well.
Pr0n for the pr0n god! Lewds for the lewd throne!
You dont like it? Ignore it. Stop talking for everyone else like you have the moral highground to do it, because you are not, grow a little.

2021 btw
low rated
avatar
Belovek: 2021 btw
Not an argument, Taliban are also 2021.
avatar
Belovek: 2021 btw
avatar
morolf: Not an argument, Taliban are also 2021.
Are you implying talibans are already at gog forum pages? Makes sense
Post edited September 01, 2021 by Belovek
avatar
Belovek: Are you implying talibans are already at gog forum pages? Makes sense
No, but "It's [current year]" just isn't a good argument, it assumes there's some linear progress in history and if you don't agree with all [current year] values, you're "on the wrong side of history". imo that is a very arrogant view.
avatar
Belovek: Are you implying talibans are already at gog forum pages? Makes sense
avatar
morolf: No, but "It's [current year]" just isn't a good argument, it assumes there's some linear progress in history and if you don't agree with all [current year] values, you're "on the wrong side of history". imo that is a very arrogant view.
You are just focusing in a sarcastic frase I use, to try to make your point valid somehow. The non-sarcastic part was the part you ignore.
Succubus (https://www.gog.com/game/succubus) have graphic sex scenes and (a lot) of nudity.