It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Tarm: Actually I just guessed what Gekko_Dekko meant and hoped for an answer from him/her.
Though you made a good point so my comment lead to something constructive anyway. :)
avatar
Maighstir: If the people who decided that the system doesn't need the functions they've removed (or never added) try to use it, perhaps they'll decide differently.
Hm. I've found that logic to be anathema to anyone in a leadership, management or theoretical role.
avatar
Maighstir: If the people who decided that the system doesn't need the functions they've removed (or never added) try to use it, perhaps they'll decide differently.
avatar
Tarm: Hm. I've found that logic to be anathema to anyone in a leadership, management or theoretical role.
Well, it may be that I assume GOG's higher-ups to have a just slightly better understanding of technology and usability than the average PHB. At least to such an extent that they -when trying to use whatever their staff created- can judge if it's actually working or not.
avatar
Tarm: Hm. I've found that logic to be anathema to anyone in a leadership, management or theoretical role.
avatar
Maighstir: Well, it may be that I assume GOG's higher-ups to have a just slightly better understanding of technology and usability than the average PHB. At least to such an extent that they -when trying to use whatever their staff created- can judge if it's actually working or not.
I'd be more interested in knowing if GOG hire people to test that or keep it in house. If in house then I'm in agreement with you. :)