It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
So yeah, there goes the thread, just like I said... took what, two pages? Not bad for today's internet.
avatar
Breja: I think you need to rewatch the film. Or at least read a wiki entry about a certain admiral.
avatar
LootHunter: Thanks, now I recall it - how Humans, Vulcans, Klingons and Romulans joined together in conspiracy to prevent Humans and Klingons from joining together.
avatar
ThorChild: Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars.
avatar
LootHunter: When talking about Star Wars you really shouldn't forget about Kennedy. She is a woman and in this day and age women should be properly credited for their contributions.
If I had to compare the new SW plotwise (haven't watched them to criticize anything else), it's with the fanfic written by the light being of the Futurama ST episode (though it was more respectful with the old cast).
low rated
avatar
Breja: So yeah, there goes the thread, just like I said... took what, two pages? Not bad for today's internet.
Because I said "Trump"? lol
low rated
OK, thread's saved.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OlKmoApdok
From what i understand, STP resumes from the Kelvin Timeline. Which isn't TNG or anything official Star Trek, rather it's a branch of the license that... no one cares about.

Also has a lot of forced political themes, and does a poor job of handling any of them.
avatar
rtcvb32: From what i understand, STP resumes from the Kelvin Timeline.
Nope, it just continues after the last TNG movie Nemesis.
low rated
avatar
rtcvb32: From what i understand, STP resumes from the Kelvin Timeline. Which isn't TNG or anything official Star Trek, rather it's a branch of the license that... no one cares about.

Also has a lot of forced political themes, and does a poor job of handling any of them.
The "Kelvin timeline" is the licensing-hell timeline.
avatar
rtcvb32: From what i understand, STP resumes from the Kelvin Timeline. Which isn't TNG or anything official Star Trek, rather it's a branch of the license that... no one cares about.

Also has a lot of forced political themes, and does a poor job of handling any of them.
I think it's like DragonBall? The Kelvin timeline diverges from the original but doesn't affect it. Kind of creating another universe.
avatar
richlind33: The "Kelvin timeline" is the licensing-hell timeline.
Mhmm...

avatar
rtcvb32: From what i understand, STP resumes from the Kelvin Timeline.
avatar
teceem: Nope, it just continues after the last TNG movie Nemesis.
When i was watching thoughts and comentary from others, they specify there's an event that happens in the kelvin timeline that is also referrenced in STP. Not to mention they are getting limited licensing in a few items and changing as much as they can to be '25% different'. Also reusing Discovery costumes/uniforms.

One of the directors started adding mroe TNG but got the rug pulled from under him...

Trying to find the explainations. Somewhere between Midnight's Edge and Dave Cullen who were analyzing this.
low rated
avatar
teceem: Nope, it just continues after the last TNG movie Nemesis.
avatar
rtcvb32: When i was watching thoughts and comentary from others, they specify there's an event that happens in the kelvin timeline that is also referrenced in STP.
I think you misunderstod. "An event" (Romulan sun going supernova) happens in the Prime Timeline. But subsequent Spock time-travel creates "Kelvin timeline", where all JJ movies take place. While Picard takes place in Prime timeline, just after the supernova event.

It sorta like in Avengers: Endgame. When they try to get the Tesseract in the past, Loki escapes, but it happens to "alternate world", not the main timeline.
Post edited February 11, 2020 by LootHunter
avatar
LootHunter: I think you misunderstod. "An event" (Romulan sun going supernova) happens in the Prime Timeline. But subsequent Spock time-travel creates "Kelvin timeline", where all JJ movies take place. While Picard takes place in Prime timeline, just after the supernova event.

It sorta like in Avengers: Endgame. When they try to get the Tesseract in the past, Loki escapes, but it happens to "alternate world", not the main timeline.
Never watched Endgame.

Might have been Doomcock i was listening to; entertaining as hell and informative.

Regardless, it's a show i won't watch. Much like the recent Dr WHO, and anything else tainted by SJWs and woke culture.
low rated
avatar
ThorChild: ...Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars...
Star Wars being high fantasy in space is not something which I would call sci-fi. And I believe time is the thing which destroyed both franchises - nothing lasts forever. Abrams being a incompetent is just a symptom of it, rather than cause.
avatar
ThorChild: ...Abrams has succesfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars...
avatar
Mafwek: ...And I believe time is the thing which destroyed both franchises - nothing lasts forever. Abrams being a incompetent is just a symptom of it, rather than cause.
Isn't that the truth! These franchises look just like aging celebrities that don't know when to stop having plastic surgery.
Post edited February 11, 2020 by richlind33
avatar
ThorChild: Abrams has successfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars.
avatar
teceem: He did that all by himself? Wow!
Anyway, Abrams had no involvement in ST: Picard, or in any of the other Star Trek tv series.
Kurtzman/Abrams they are more or less the same ;) The tones set in the New Star Trek films is what has killed Star Trek (films and tv series since the 'New' films) and that is all Abrams and Kurtzman fault for creating it and telling it the way they do (terrible plots badly told with unlikable characters).

You can pretty much flip New Star Trek and New Star Wars between one another for a similar feel of god awful wtf was that?!

"Bro you see the Star Trek/Star Wars last night, sick! Boom! man those aliens suck dude! And WOAH that explosions was the biggest EVAR! Light-sabers/Phasers are SO sick bro!"

That is where we are at thanks to the guys i just mentioned. It's pretty sad. And i stand by Redletter media's analysis for these franchises especially (which is why i posted their review of Picard so far).

avatar
ThorChild: ...Abrams has successfully destroyed two of my all time favourite sci-fi franchises, Trek and Star Wars...
avatar
Mafwek: Star Wars being high fantasy in space is not something which I would call sci-fi. And I believe time is the thing which destroyed both franchises - nothing lasts forever. Abrams being a incompetent is just a symptom of it, rather than cause.
I agree that in many ways what has happened to Star Trek and Star Wars is like a cultural malaise, like a sign that our culture is regressing as does our art and the standards we aspire to. Abrams is just a man of his time and his 'art' reflects that.

Still having said that i think it is still possible (but growing more unlikely all the time) we could have carried on having great Star Trek and Star Wars stuff, not everyone capable of doing that is dead, just yet, and not every younger director is going to suck at story telling (which is essentially all film is) as much as Abrams and Kurtzman. They all (young and old) have to fight the big issue of modern film development though. Not an easy task at all, and not one i see an answer to in truth.

We just have to get used to films/tv series sucking most of the time, and adjust our expectations to that.
Post edited February 12, 2020 by ThorChild
low rated
avatar
Mafwek: Star Wars being high fantasy in space is not something which I would call sci-fi. And I believe time is the thing which destroyed both franchises - nothing lasts forever. Abrams being a incompetent is just a symptom of it, rather than cause.
avatar
ThorChild: I agree that in many ways what has happened to Star Trek and Star Wars is like a cultural malaise, like a sign that our culture is regressing as does our art and the standards we aspire to. Abrams is just a man of his time and his 'art' reflects that.
You've got it all backwards. It's not "our cultrue" that produces people like Abrams and Kennedy - it's people like Abrams and Kennedy that push culture towards the direction of formulaing production and mediocrity.

You can just look at John Favro's Mandalorian or Seth McFlaren's Orville to see how they not only capture the spirit of original franchises, but also find popularity among modern audience. That's why I'm saying that the fault for the recent falures isn't on some nebulous "historical change" or "modern culture", but on quite specific men (and women).
Post edited February 12, 2020 by LootHunter