richlind33: Who forced GOG to try to be all things to all people, to the point that it's grown beyond it's ability to maintain an acceptable degree of quality? It's own CEO, perhaps?
BKGaming: Nobody forced it. It's a consequence of growth, which happens because something is becoming more popular. Growth can be a double edge sword.
richlind33: And when exactly is Galaxy going to stop being part of this problem and become part of the solution?
BKGaming: Well that would hinge on Galaxy actually being the problem. It isn't and can be part of the solution. GOG issues were out in the open long before Galaxy entered the picture. Galaxy can largely be the tool that cuts on the middle man out, ie GOG which has to waste resources doing things like testing patches, packaging patches and games, etc things not needed with Galaxy. Things that can be easy automated so a human being from GOG doesn't have to do it, and so that devs can take care of these things themselves automatically without GOG playing the gatekeeper. Those resources could be better spend on hiring developers who could be improving the site. the customer experience and by extension Galaxy.
Granted I don't think they plan to dropping standalone installers like some people believe but even then Galaxy can be a benefit to streamlining the process for standalone installers which GOG has already started doing.
Growth *is* a double-edged sword, and has occurred because GOG made it a priority, in spite of being ill-prepared for what it entails. And Galaxy has clearly contributed to GOG's growth, and continues to do so, so yes, it *is* part of the problem -- and will continue to be until GOG learns the necessity of growing *within it's means* -- which will require significantly improved leadership and management.
richlind33: And please tell us how the game industry's decision to make "online functionality" the core of it's existence isn't being done for the purpose of making DRM a moot point?
BKGaming: That going to happen regardless of what GOG does. Developers feel online functionality adds to the core experience and largely consumers agree with them otherwise these type of games wouldn't be so popular. If GOG doesn't adapt to that then GOG will be left behind as more newer releases include online functionality. Believe it or not it really doesn't have anything to do with DRM in most cases, though I can see how one could feel it is as restrictive as DRM.
The single player experience isn't going away though, there will always be a place for your Witcher 3's and your Skyrims. Even you story driven single player experiences.
richlind33: And BTW, isn't this trend suspiciously similar to Microsoft's decision to become a "service" provider, rather than a software publisher, which is clearly being done for the purpose of circumventing laws pertaining to consumer rights?
BKGaming: GOG has always been as service provider... GOG isn't the software publisher for these games. They do not publish all the software they sell, they are a store front that sells software published by other companies (edit: well except the software they own the rights too which is sold under GOG ltd). You subscribe to this service and to the terms of service which layout your rights under this service.
As far as MS doing so to circumventing laws, it irrelevant to this but I'd argue MS moving to becoming a service provider is because it's more profitable... see Google, Apple, etc.
Developers are subservient to the publishing giants, and consumer preferences are dictated by marketing strategies, of which "online functionality" is a centerpiece.
People want what they see, and what they see is increasingly controlled by a small number of companies that are rabidly dedicated to defending and expanding their intellectual property rights. So let's stop pretending that the tail is wagging the dog, because it isn't.
There's a huge difference between how products and services are regulated, and for a software publisher like Microsoft, this translates into a vast ocean of loopholes that it can exploit with it's gargantuan legal resources -- which will obviously prove to be immensely profitable if it is allowed to go forward. And it is equally obvious that "online functionality" is an integral component of this marketing strategy. Bells and whistles to distract us while we are stripped of our few remaining rights -- though I am quite certain that the majority of us will barely notice, as distraction is the predominant state of mind at this point in time.