Lifthrasil: Again, it's completely irrelevant if GR buried an L or not. Everything that was buried is now back in the pile. That's what 'reshuffle ' means.
That is not dead, which can eternal lie, for with strange eons even discard may die! As for the voting: I think that we are forcing the hands of the fascists. There was such a strong case for going with these 4 players, that voting no would look off at this point. So even if all were liberal, all the fascists can do is hope for 3F.
That being said, it is still quite likely, that one if these 4 is a fascist. We have 3 fascists (including Hitler) and 7 Liberals. Any group of 4 out of these is quite likely to contain (at least) one fascist. To be precise, the likelihood of at least one F- aligned person in any group of 4 in this game is 83,33%
My point was we have no visible conflict, so either one of these pairs is FF or FH
OR GR buried the L to force F.
Also,
there are only 8 players. 3F/H+5L That you didn't know this is strange, to say the least, not to mention questionable. The flavor has mentioned it 4 times (spelled eight)--not to mention every vote count that wasn't unanimous (7x) plus the startup player list. ZFR mentioned it
I said it [url=https://www.gog.com/forum/general/secret_hitler_3_beyond_stardom/post488]here.
It's been mentioned at least 14x, so your calling it a 10 player game is suspicious, as you pay attention to these things. Now, the question is...how could lying or otherwise misrepresenting the number of players in this manner help L?
ZFR: The fact that RW again is pointing you towards investigating him makes me think he's Lib. At least not Hitler, who wouldn't risk it. And I highly doubt he's a regular Fascist.
Unless RW is H and is 100% sure Joe is F, or RW is F & knows Joe is H.
Question for those experienced at this. does it ever make sense for a F who has been not buddying up to their partners to
ask to be investigated by an F in hopes that they are declared H to clear an H who is under question? This would automatically let H know the ID of at least one person...my question is basically, can we trust an investigation of an H?
Would there be reason for F's to call an L player "H", or is this self-defeating as it exposes an F to that L player?