You I have in mind as flub's chancellor.
Why the change? It's just gut feeling, and I needed to make choice.

Can't say I like it. If the change was made because of rtcvb's wanting to quit then not cool.

But since I find flub and rtcvb to be both on the same level of suspiciousness I'm voting yes.

@blotunga, you can have me in mind as flub's chancellor, but it's him who'll be doing the selection. I hope he won't surprise you.

blotunga was investigated and trentonlf is pretty.


He's a dick.....although he is a liberal one.

CURRENT PROPOSED GOVERNMENT
President: The Mighty Blotunga (blotunga)
Chancellor: Flub. (flubbucket)

Please PM me your yes/no votes on whether you wish for this setup or not. There must be a majority "yes" for this to pass.

Looking at the board the quickest route back to ZFR is going with RTCVB. Either that or randomly turning a card.

I found RTCVBs post to mean he's Hitler or hasn't thought the game out. So a risk, but 1 risk instead of 2. And we get back to ZFR quicker, so something to think about.

Wait a minute what happened to 'I'll go with the democratic choice?' 2 unknowns is indeed risky

Who are you planning on passing the government to?

For you, I prefer 1. Pooka 2. ZFR 3. Trent.

Because at this stage passing Liberal policy is the most important

The choice I voted on initially was flub/zfr. I thought the recent mention of rtcvb was a change of mind...

Joe!



could you send me a PM? it's doing that I-can't-access-messages-until-I-receive-one-from-you thing...

are you sure you haven't put me on the 'speak when you're spoken to' setting? ;p

I still have a bad feeling about flubb. But yes, that's the same weak 'feeling' argument that ZFR used against trent. Bother. I'm almost tempted to risk a random policy to get back to the mostly liberal country as soon as possible. But on the other hand, we have a good chance that at least one person of the currently proposed government is liberal. While, if we don't go through with this, the next governments will be headed by suspicious unknowns. Damn. I guess I'll have to stick to voting yes.

@Lift worst case I will get in disagreement with flub, which means that he's scum.

...

...

Or at least one of you is.

Actually considering the state of the game, I would suggest that if you are voted into office and happen to draw LLF, don't test flubb, but pass him LL. There are little enough liberal policies left in the pile that it's not worth risking to lose a possible passed L. We only need 2 more to win, so passing policies now takes preference over testing.

I agree, if we get a LLF, I'll pass on LL and we take our chances.

Why is it between rtcvb and drawing random? Why not flub?

Vote Yes.

It's good for the country.

I would say that depends on flubb's behaviour as chancellor.