I'm happy to be investigated, like Blotunga states, I'm the only one I can trust and the only one I know for a fact is a Liberal

However I'm a believer, in testing one of the players from the first 2-3 governments, no one else seems on board with this though.

Most people seem to be going with Blontunga's claim. However if he and you are fascist or Hitler that would present a problem.

Testing Lift makes some sense as he is next.

You do realise from everyone else's perspective your government would be every bit as unknown as my own, right?

Your play seems very individualistic and whether it's a liberal genuinely only trusting his own vote or a fascist or hitler trying desperately to get power remains to be seen.

I actually think if Hitler is in your position on the board and he has not been in power he probably panics

I'm not really insisting on myself (though I consider me as the most trustworthy), I've already stated that flub and rtcb are just as well. The idea is that if we make you president, we still have to pick from one of the three unknowns (me, flub, rtcb) before joe can be president. Position-wise rtcb would be probably ideal since if we don't think joe is a good enough pick, we can always go straight to zfr them.
Also, I don't think Hitler would be too keen on being chancellor and then president. Too much can go wrong at this stage.

I'm also quite alright with a flubbucket investigation.

My vote's still for blotunga, I might do a quick unofficial votecount (starting from lifthrasil's suggestion in post 491 If you expressed some opinion elsewhere that you would expect to be counted, sorry! :

Voter - Voted for
1. ZFR - rtcvb
2. trent - blotunga/rtcvb
3. SirP
4. Pooka - supplementscene
5. Lifthrasil - blotunga
6. Supple Scene - Joe/trent/lift
7. blotunga - rtcvb/flubbucket/blotunga
8. RT-CB - rtcvb
9. Flub. - blotunga/flubbucket
10. Joe - blotunga

not voted - SirP
most votes - Blotunga (5 or 3 and 5/6 depending on how you count people who had multiple choices)
second most - rtcvb (3 or 2 and 1/2)


Let me know if you disagree! It's not always been explicitly stated so a bit of interpretation has occurred.

I guess everyone made their minds clear on this one. I have decided to investigate blotunga. I hope nobody takes issue with this, but if you do anyway, let me know.

Muahahahahaha!! My misleading data has swayed the investigation in my team's favour! muahahahahahaa!!













nah just kidding.

Wait a sec. I didn't know we were actually voting (and I don't think it's a good idea to have the investigation selected by vote majority). I meant I'd like to know rtcvb's alignment in I had investigative powers, not necessarily that it should be whom Pooka investigates.

Pooka, I was going to repeat a statement that either Lift, Brasas or someone else expressed in the last game. If you are a liberal (which I'm having doubts about but might be true), then consider investigating a person the knowledge of whose alignment will help you personally make better decisions. For everyone else, the investigative information you get and give us is affected by the fact that we don't know if you're lying or telling the truth for the purpose of wifom or to appear more liberal or whatever. You needn't necessarily go by majority vote.

But I see you made your decision already.

*narrows eyes...* That... doesn't seem like what you said...

.....


why not mention this yesterday?

Not sure if I believe you. ;-)

worth it

I know, but that's what I meant. I didn't know it would be taken as a cast vote.

Because I was away for the weekend and just came back.

Regardless, I don't think blotunga is a bad vote either way.

Also, in the previous game the first person to say "investigate me!" was fascist. In this game, let's see... rtcvb?

sure I can go with that.


So who posted yesterday from your account?..

--

oh no wait, I get it, you had just got back, not you have just got back. Cool.





...anybody know any good grammar puzzles?