I practicing disappointing my constituents so when I actually get to be president I'll be a disappointment machine.

I can get behind this plan. Interested to hear what others think of it.

Why flub? Sure, his 'I am Hitler' was formulated as a joke. But knowing Flubb, he might very well make exactly such a joke if he really were Hitler. Plus his question to Scene, asking for clarification on a point (why vote NO) which Scene had already elaborated on in a quite verbose fashion, shows that flubb didn't really read the thread. Or at least didn't pay attention. To me, that question looked like fake activity. Flubb saw a chance to appear inquisitive with minimal effort.

In conclusion, while I didn't agree with scene's reasoning for voting NO on the first government, flubb's question was strange and I don't trust him right now.


I like this plan much more than flubb as Chancellor! (or, really, anyone else but flubb, at the moment)

Of course my plan might have a slight flaw if trent is scum and he passes 2 F to Lift. Then goes on saying that he passed LF and that lift is scum.

If that happens, we have to re-evaluate. In any case such a conflict would make both trent and me suspicious and make it safer play to exclude us from future governments for the time being. Because if such a conflict happens, where two players disagree about which cards were passed, one of them usually is a fascist. But that's the point of testing players. Not only the chancellor is tested, but the president as well.

A 1 vs 1 conflict isn't the worst here. We can disable you both and still come ahead.

I'm still suspicious about zfr and joe. Zfr's logical choice (non-random) for chancellor should've been one of the next 3 in line for presidency.

When you start getting 75% chance of every card you draw being a Fascist card... It's far more how many cards are left and less the odds.

Not saying impossible, I'm saying it's highly unlikely.

Exactly what I said.

There is something to that. Yes. It basically boils down to the question: do you believe ZFR that he did use random.org? Or do you assume that he used his well known random.org addiction as cover to maneuver Joe into a position where he could 'prove' himself as 'Liberal'?

If this site had a [dice] feature, you could roll a dice, then use that. But otherwise you have to take him at his word. Random and selected have the same odds of being chosen.

Or, instead of choosing Joe as Chancellor, you can choose me.

Or somebody.......anybody......choo choo choose.

We can get to that when we get there.

So, trent, do we get an official nomination?