supplementscene: I disagree, we should always analyse behaviour and ask questions because behaviour is information. In the last game I asked 'why did Bler and Trent leave my wagon early if they believe I'm the best wagon for hitting mafia'. It turned out both were Mafia players but no one ran with that query. How did Bler know I maybe killed during the night, which he said in the start of Day 2. No one asked that either. When the group don't ask questions they don't get answers.

This game I even went to the bother of getting the initial table line up to see if that would confirm or deny ZFRs intent. In fact it turns out ZFR didn't know his alignment when he made that request but it was worth investigating motivations in theory.

And you've actually contradicted yourself because you've Scum read me because of my analysis. Yet you haven't bothered to pick apart my analysis on it's merits. You've merely accused me of 'throwing shade', as if Scumhunting and providing analysis isn't pro town. This lack of analysis makes me question your intent.

trentonlf: but trying to cast shade on him for doing something he does every game is you trying to push an agenda before anything has happened.

JoeSapphire: Is you accusing supplementscene of trying to push an agenda for something he does every game trying to push an agenda?

trentonlf: I didn't realize that supplementscene tried to cast shade on someone every game at the start of the game before anything has happened. So I guess your saying I should just let him cast shade at the beginning of a game because he always does that?

trentonlf: He explicitly said he used random.org to choose who to be chancellor before he even knew his alignment.

JoeSapphire: I don't see why you should try and stop him.

All we're doing right now is waiting around for SirPrimalform to move the game forwards. I don't always agree with the things supplementscene writes, but I enjoy getting an insight into his thought processes. I don't see why that's a problem.

trentonlf: The problem is not that he’s putting his thoughts out there, the problem is he’s casting shade on someone and trying to base it on nothing.

Maybe you’re ok with someone doing that, I’m not.

trentonlf: It looks like SirPrimalform is who we are waiting on. It shows who has voted where all our names are listed in the OP.

JoeSapphire: There's been times when he's said he thinks ZFR's playing liberal, and times when he thinks ZFR's playing fascist. It doesn't really seem like throwing shade - which has connotations of being personal, malicious and underhanded, but more thinking out loud.

But also if there's ever a time where throwing shade is an acceptable thing to do, it's in a game of forum mafialike.
Do I want people to be influenced by erronious conclusions? No
Do I want erronious conclusions to go unquestioned? No
Do I want to prevent people making erronious conclusions in the first place? NEVER

vote for joe

trentonlf: His comment to ZFR about lying and not trusting him out of game ever again if he was lying was casting shade.

JoeSapphire: what did you vote?

SirPrimalform: I can't remember!

JoeSapphire: well change your vote! there's still time

then tell us what you changed it to

SirPrimalform: But if I change it then all I'll know is that it's the opposite of what it was before!